The case given in the facts is in dissonance to S. 25(1) and S.24 (1) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 but in consonance with the exceptions to the rule provided in the Act whose origin lies in the...
Both the cases come under the ambit of Section 56 which includes the doctrine of frustration theory in implied terms and through just and reasonable solutions by the judges. Also no intentions of...
In contemporary legal India, it is critical to obtain a deeper understanding of the pre-existing structure of Legal Practice in India. As we begin to explore post-1991 change we also need to unde...
The case given in the facts is in dissonance to S. 25(1) and S.24 (1) of the Sale of Goods Act, ...
In contemporary legal India, it is critical to obtain a deeper understanding of the pre-existing...
Both the cases come under the ambit of Section 56 which includes the doctrine of frustration the...