Alagammal v. Ganesan (2023) Provision Involved Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Specific Performance of a contract. The case of Alagammal v. Ganesan (2023) deals with the ...
Union of India vs. B.T. Patil & Sons Belgaum (2024) Provisions Involved: Exim Policy (1992-1997): This Export-Import policy governs duty drawbacks, specifically in relation to...
Case analysis: Sushil Kumar Pandey & Ors. vs. The High Court of Jharkhand Provision Involved: Rules 14, 18, 21, and 22 of the Jharkhand Superior Judicial (Recruitment, Appointment, and Cond...
Case analysis of: High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of U.P. & Ors. Provisions Involved: Article 142 of the Constitution of India: This Article allows the S...
Case Analysis of: Cdr Seema Chaudhary vs. Union of India (2024) Provision Involved: Articles 32 and 142 of the Indian Constitution: These provisions deal with the power ...
The Apex Court in Dahiben vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra) (D) Thr Lrs (2020) 7 SCC 366 pronounced a landmark judgment on issues surrounding the cancellation of a sale deed, fraud, and...
The judiciary of India, often heralded as the sentinel on the qui vive for the rights and liberties of its citizens, is vested with immense powers, particularly by virtue of the Supreme Court's...
The doctrine of the curative petition represents a significant facet of the Indian judicial system, epitomizing the apex court's commitment to rectifying its own erroneous judgments. First crys...
Contextualising the Court's decision: introduction About 10 years after the plight of a visually impaired Scheduled Caste woman who was raped reached before the bench of Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and...
Quota within quota: what happened and what's next?The Supreme Court's recent judgement about subcategorisation within the Scheduled Caste categories and as a result, overruling its own decision o...