A crucial step towards incorporating the WhatsApp messaging platform into
Supreme Court proceedings was taken when Justice DY Chandrachud, Chief Justice
of the Indian Supreme Court, announced it yesterday. This move is a major stride
in promoting communication and transparency in the Indian judiciary, with the
ultimate aim being to deliver justice to the public easily, efficiently, and
promptly. However, this introduction, with an aim of boosting accessibility to
court services and improving efficiency in court communications, evokes numerous
issues and concerns that deserve a reflective evaluation.
Communication and Transparency:
The consideration of incorporating WhatsApp messaging services into the Supreme
Court's IT network has been elevated as a way of reinforcing access to justice
and ensuring transparency in the judicial system. Even though this plan is
highly commendable, it is important to thoroughly analyze its probable
implications on communication efficiency and transparency.
Pros and Cons of WhatsApp Integration:
WhatsApp has a large user base and is widely used by legal practitioners and
stakeholders. As a result, the Supreme Court can take advantage of using an
established communication platform to simplify processes and make it easier for
people to access court-related information. Also, integrating WhatsApp is
expected to lower dependence on conventional modes of communication like sending
physical letters or emails, which may even cut costs and prove useful
environmentally too.
On the other hand, the integration of WhatsApp has issues on data security,
personal privacy, and the quality of the communication channels. In this sense,
WhatsApp is a social media messaging platform owned by Facebook and has
previously come under heavy fire regarding its data privacy measures as well as
its susceptibility to security lapses. It brings a level of risk into the
equation that unauthorized personnel may have access to sensitive information or
at worst, it could compromise case proceedings legality. Similarly, the option
of sending only one-way communications through a particular official number
(87687676) may curtail interactivity and thus stall stakeholders' commitment
towards keeping pace with court-related notices and updates efficiently.
Impact on Legal Practice:
The introduction of WhatsApp as a platform for Supreme Court proceedings would
completely change how legal practitioners interact with the court process and
obtain information related to their cases. Advocates-on-Record and
Party-in-Person would receive automated messages on e-filing, cause lists,
orders, and judgments, allowing for instant updates on their case progress or
new developments. This live court data can potentially streamline work and
performance among the legal fraternity so that lawyers are constantly updated on
the happenings in court proceedings and can act accordingly without delay.
On the other hand, using WhatsApp as the main means of communication in legal
matters can be difficult for people or groups who have little chance to possess
a Smartphone or constant access to the Internet. Although the urban coverage of
WhatsApp is widespread, there might be challenges in using this platform for
court notifications and updates by the population from rural and remote areas,
which would worsen already noticeable inequalities in their accessibility to
justice.
Conclusion:
On the whole, the Supreme Court's adoption of the WhatsApp messaging service in
court procedures is a big leap towards harnessing technology to provide wider
access to justice and improve communication processes within the Indian legal
system. Nevertheless, this move creates genuine fears about data security,
privacy rights, and equal access to judicial information.
Looking ahead, it is
mandatory for the apex court to develop mechanisms that will ensure protection
against such threats and maintain WhatsApp as a reliable channel for
communication among attorneys in legal proceedings. Moreover, all actors need to
be alert and active participants in steering how the adoption of this approach
can mitigate potential risks and leverage its prospects for efficient justice
administration in India.
Written By: Md.Imran Wahab, IPS, IGP, Provisioning, West Bengal
Email:
[email protected], Ph no: 9836576565
Please Drop Your Comments