File Copyright Online - File mutual Divorce in Delhi - Online Legal Advice - Lawyers in India

The Decision On LGBTQ+ In India

Supriyo@Supriya Chkaarborty & Others V/S Union Of India
In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the rights of LGBTQIA+ individuals, marking a decisive victory in the battle for equality and recognition. This ruling stems from a rich legal history, notably including the pivotal Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India case of 2018, which recognized sexual orientation as a fundamental right. Furthermore, landmark decisions such as the NAZ Foundation v. NCTD in 2010 and the Justice KS Puttaswamy (9J) case underscore the judiciary's commitment to upholding the rights and dignity of all individuals, irrespective of sexual orientation.

Central to this legal discourse is the contentious Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalized "intercourse against the order of nature" based on moral principles. However, through progressive legal interpretations, the Supreme Court has debunked archaic notions, emphasizing that LGBTQIA+ individuals are entitled to the full spectrum of constitutional rights, including the right to choose their partners and engage in fulfilling relationships without fear of discrimination.

In light of these legal precedents, the LGBTQIA+ community has rightfully demanded equal recognition under the law, particularly in the realm of marriage. They argue that the exclusion of LGBTQIA+ individuals from the Special Marriage Act (SMA) violates their fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 15, 19, 21, and 25 of the Constitution. They assert that denying them the right to marry under the SMA not only strips them of their dignity but also perpetuates systemic discrimination.

Moreover, the petitioners advocate for a broader societal shift towards recognizing marriage as a matter of constitutional morality, transcending traditional norms and prejudices. They assert that the SMA, originally enacted to facilitate marriages across religious and caste lines, must evolve to embrace the diversity of modern relationships, including those within the LGBTQIA+ community.

Crucially, the court's ruling affirms the right to a union or relationship for LGBTQIA+ individuals under Article 21, encompassing mental, emotional, and sexual aspects. However, it stops short of mandating legal recognition of such unions, emphasizing that this must be achieved through legislative action rather than judicial fiat.

In examining the societal landscape, it is evident that while legal strides have been made, there remains a disparity between legal recognition and societal acceptance of LGBTQIA+ rights, particularly in the context of marriage. Nevertheless, this landmark verdict represents a significant step towards a more inclusive and equitable society, affirming the rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. 

Law Article in India

Ask A Lawyers

You May Like

Legal Question & Answers

Lawyers in India - Search By City

Copyright Filing
Online Copyright Registration


How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi


How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...

Increased Age For Girls Marriage


It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...

Facade of Social Media


One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...

Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...


The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India: A...


The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a concept that proposes the unification of personal laws across...

Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Legal...


Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors of the economy, and the legal i...

Lawyers Registration
Lawyers Membership - Get Clients Online

File caveat In Supreme Court Instantly