Historical Context - Erasure and Criminalization:
Historically, transgender individuals in ancient and medieval India held
various social positions and were often integrated within communities. However,
the British colonial rule drastically altered this landscape. During their
rule, the British introduced repressive legislation, most notably the
"Criminal Tribes Act, 1871." This law unjustly labelled the entire transgender
community as "criminal" by birth, leading to systemic harassment,
surveillance, and punishment. This draconian discriminatory law, which
continued even after India's independence in 1947, left a lasting legacy of
stigma and marginalization, but was abolished in the month of August, 1949.
Constitutional Imperative and the Long Wait for Legislation:
India's Constitution, which came into force on January 26, 1950,
guaranteed fundamental rights to all citizens. However, it took a significant
amount of time for these rights to be explicitly extended and effectively
implemented for transgender persons. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar rightly emphasized that
the implementation of constitutional rights depends on the people responsible
for enforcing them. Regrettably, transgender individuals continued to face
immense hardship and discrimination, highlighting a significant gap between
constitutional ideals and lived realities. It took nearly 70 years after the
Constitution came into effect for specific legislation addressing their rights
to be enacted in year 2019.
The Landmark Judgement and Subsequent Legislative Efforts:
A turning point in the fight for transgender rights came on April 15,
2014, with the landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the National
Legal Services Authority v. Union of India case. In this historic ruling, the
Supreme Court recognized transgender persons as "third gender,"
affirming their right to self-identification of their gender. The court also
directed the central and state governments to take steps to end discrimination
against them and to provide them with access to education, employment,
healthcare, and other essential services.
Following this landmark judgment, several attempts were made to
introduce legislation protecting the rights of transgender persons. Immediately
after the Supreme Court's decision, a private member bill titled "The
Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014" was introduced in Rajya Sabha on
December 12, 2014, by Rajya Sabha MP Tiruchi Siva. This bill was passed by the
Rajya Sabha on April 24, 2015, and was subsequently introduced in Lok Sabha in
May 2015. However, it could not be passed in the Lok Sabha.
The Government of India then introduced its own bill, "The
Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2016," in the Lok Sabha
on August 2, 2016. Recognizing certain shortcomings in this bill, it was
referred to the "Standing Committee on Social Justice and
Empowerment" on September 8, 2016, for review and recommendations. The
Standing Committee submitted its report on July 21, 2017.
Based on the Standing Committee's recommendations, amendments were made
to the 2016 Bill, and it was passed in the Lok Sabha on December 17, 2018,
under the title "The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill,
2018." However, this bill then remained pending for consideration in the
Rajya Sabha. Due to the dissolution of the 16th Lok Sabha, the 2018 Bill
lapsed.
The Enactment of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act,
2019:
With the commencement of the 17th Lok Sabha, a new bill with the same
title, "The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019,"
was introduced in Lok Sabha on July 19, 2019. This bill successfully passed in
the Lok Sabha on August 5, 2019, followed by its passage in the Rajya Sabha on
November 26, 2019. Finally, after receiving the assent of the President of
India on December 5, 2019, this bill became "The Transgender Persons
(Protection of Rights) Act, 2019." The Act officially came into force on
January 10, 2020, following its notification in the Official Gazette.
Significance and Key Provisions:
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, represents a
significant step forward in recognizing and protecting the rights of
transgender individuals in India. The Act aims to:
v Define "transgender person": The Act defines a transgender person as
someone whose gender does not match the gender assigned at birth and includes
transmen, transwomen, persons with intersex variations, and genderqueer
individuals.
v Prohibit discrimination: The Act prohibits discrimination against
transgender persons in various spheres of life, including education,
employment, healthcare, housing, and access to public goods and services.
v Right to self-perceived gender identity: The Act recognizes the right of transgender
persons to self-perceive their gender identity. However, the initial provisions
requiring a certificate of identity from a District Magistrate were met with
criticism from the transgender community, who argued it was intrusive and
bureaucratic.
v Welfare measures: The Act mandates the government to take
measures for the welfare of transgender persons, including providing access to
healthcare facilities, education, vocational training, and employment
opportunities.
v Establishment of National Council for
Transgender Persons: The Act
provides for the establishment of a National Council for Transgender Persons to
advise the government on policies and programs related to transgender
individuals.
v Offences and penalties: The Act prescribes penalties for offences
committed against transgender persons.
Loopholes:
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act of 2019, while a
significant piece of legislation, faces considerable criticism from both the
transgender community and human rights advocates due to notable shortcomings. A
key issue lies within the gender recognition process, where the initial
requirement for a District Magistrate-issued certificate, involving mandated
medical examinations, undermined self-determination despite the Act's
acknowledgement of self-perceived gender identity, contradicting the Supreme
Court's NALSA ruling. The Act's failure to address reservation policies in
education and employment constitutes another major deficiency, hindering the
socio-economic advancement of transgender individuals and exacerbating existing
disparities.
Furthermore, the ambiguous definition of "family" and the
absence of explicit protections against familial discrimination expose
transgender individuals to potential abuse and abandonment. Disparities in
penalties for crimes against transgender individuals compared to cisgender
individuals also raise concerns regarding equal legal protection. Ultimately,
the Act's emphasis on vaguely defined "welfare measures" rather than
concrete rights and entitlements risks inconsistent implementation and neglect,
thereby failing to ensure true equality and independence for India's
transgender population.
Conclusion:
The enactment of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act,
2019, marks a crucial milestone in the journey towards equality and inclusion
for transgender individuals in India. It represents the culmination of years of
advocacy, judicial intervention, and legislative efforts. While the Act has
been hailed as a significant step, concerns remain regarding the implementation
of its provisions and certain aspects that the transgender community finds
restrictive. Moving forward, it is essential to ensure effective
implementation, address existing concerns through amendments and inclusive
consultations, and foster a society that truly respects and upholds the rights
and dignity of all its citizens, including transgender persons.
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...
It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...
One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...
The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...
Comments