Public Interest Litigation: Justice Beyond the Individual

What is PIL?

Public Interest Litigation is a legal mechanism that allows into visuals or groups to file law suits in a court of law not for personal gain, but to protect or enforce rights that affect the public at large. Unlike traditional litigation, where the affected party brings a case to court, PIL allows concerned citizens, NGOs or legal entities to seek judicial intervention on behalf of marginalised or disadvantaged groups.

It represents a transformative facet of modern jurisprudence, enabling the Judiciary to address matters of overarching societal concern. PIL allows individuals, groups or institutions to approach the courts in pursuit of justice on behalf of those whose rights have been infringed yet lakh the capacity or resources to redress themselves

PIL is rooted in the principle that legal remedies should not be confined solely to aggrieved parties, but must also be accessible for the enforcement of collective or diffuse rights - especially those affecting marginalized, voiceless or disadvantaged segment of society.
It expands the traditional doctrine of local standi, thereby allowing any public spirit citizen to initiate proceedings in matters where legal or constitutional obligations are breached and public welfare is imperiled.

Typically invoked in cases involving environmental degradation, administrative inaction, violation of fundamental rights, corruption or social injustices, PIL serves as a potent instrument for judicial oversight and systematic reform.

Key features:

It can be initiated by any public-spirited individual or organisation
The issues typically concern violations of constitutional or legal rights of a large number of people
Courts often take suo moto cognizance of matters of public interest
It serves as a tool for social change and legal reform

Historical Aspect
The genesis of public interest litigation can be traced to the growing recognition that access to justice must transcend procedural technicalities an individual grievances. Historically, legal systems operated within rigid frameworks, particularly the doctrine of locus standi. which required that only individual directly affected by a legal issue could approach the courts. This often left vulnerable and marginalised communities without a legal voice. The evolution of PIL marked a paradigm shift, allowing the judiciary to engage with broader issues of public.

The roots of PIL can be identified in the United States during the Civil rights movement of the 1960s and 1970's
Organisations such as the NAACP (National Association for the advancement of coloured people) and the ACLU ( American Civil liberties Union) began filing lawsuits to challenge racial segregation, gender discrimination and violation of constitutional rights,these efforts laid the foundation for the concept of litigation in the public interest where legal tools were used to achieve broader social reforms

The concept was later adopted and significantly developed in countries like India, where PIL gained formal recognition in the late 1970's an early 1980's primarily through judicial activism led by the Supreme Court. Justices like P.N.Bhagwati and V.R.Krishna Iyer were instrumental in expanding the scope of judicial intervention by relaxing procedural rules and allowing epistolary jurisdiction- where letters or postcards written by concern citizens were treated as writ petitions. Indian PILs often addressed issues such as bonded labour, environmental protection, custodial violence and the rights of slum dwellers, street children and Prisoners.

In other jurisdiction such as South Africa, PIL emerged post-apartheid as a means of enforcing social-economic rights and enshrined in the new constitutional order. In the UK,while the term "PIL" is less frequently used, Judicial review and Human Rights litigation have served similar purposes in holding public bodies accountable.

Thus, the historical development of PIL reflects a broader trend toward the liberalization of access to justice,the judicial recognition of collective rights, and the growing role of courts as instruments of social transformation.
From its early origins and civil rights advocacy to its present-day application in global human rights and environmental governance,PIL continues to evolve as a dynamic and indispensable legal mechanism in the pursuit of public justice.

Written By: Srishti Singh, LLB. Integrated, 2nd year

Also Read: