When it comes to legal remedies, you do not have a lifetime to enforce them. The
Limitation Act, 1963 provides a period of limitation applicable for various
claims. Once you miss out on the same, condonation of delay may be sought, but
it is totally up to the Court to decide whether there is sufficient cause for
such delay or not. Speaking of an agreement to sell, there is a limitation
period for the same as well. What are the circumstances and when does the
limitation period for civil suit against agreement to sell begins?
It may be noted that an agreement to sale involves two parties wherein one being
the owner of an immovable property promises to sell the said property to another
for a certain amount of consideration. The other one is the party who promises
to buy the said immovable property to become a rightful owner of the same. Since
it's an immovable property, transfer of possession requires certain formalities,
followed by registration of sale deed which finalises the sale of property. In
between, there are chances that one of them backs out, which leads to filing of
a civil suit. The information hereunder addresses the various facets related to
limitation period and agreement of sale in India.
What is the limitation period for filing a civil suit?
Ordinarily, the limitation period for filing a suit in a Civil Court is 3 years
from the date when cause of action arose. However, it may vary in specific civil
suits. For example, the limitation period for a suit for recovery of property is
12 years. Limitation for easement rights is 20 years/30 years in case of private
and government properties respectively. Thus, it depends upon the nature of
civil suit to determine the limitation period.
What is the limitation period of agreement to sale?
Once an agreement for sale is signed between the seller and the buyer, the
limitation period for performing the agreement to sell is 3 years. While the
stated period is 3 years, it is upon the buyer that when they come to notice the
other party's reluctance or refusal to perform their part in furtherance of
agreement to sell, and proceed with filing a civil suit for specific
performance.
While the primary question revolved around limitation for filing civil suit for
agreement to sell, the Supreme Court in the case of Raman v. R. Natarajan (2022)
held that "a Court cannot grant the relief of specific performance against a
person compelling him to enter into an agreement with a third party and seek
specific relief against such a third party."
Limitation for Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell
Section 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963 clearly states that the limitation period
for filing a civil suit for specific performance of a contract is 3 years. The
general rule is that the agreement to sale itself specifies the timeline for
execution and transfer of possession of the property. However, when the said
document is silent regarding limitation for performance, the limitation period
for specific performance of agreement to sell may start when the buyer comes to
the notice of the seller's reluctance/refusal to hand over the possession. The
Supreme Court in the case of
A. Valliammai v. K.P. Murali and others
(2023) clarified that as per Section 54 of Limitation Act, the limitation period
either starts on the date set for execution of contract, or from the date when
the buyer notices reluctance on part of the seller, not performing his part in
the contract of sale.
While the limitation period is 3 years, it does not mean the buyer would stay at
ease for 2 years and proceed with filing a civil suit for specific performance
after a long delay. While clinching against the leverage of 3 years for specific
performance of agreement to sell, the Supreme Court in case of
Saradamani
Kandappan vs. S. Rajalakshmi & Ors. (2011) in clear words stated that "every
suit for specific performance need not be decreed merely because it is filed
within the period of limitation by ignoring time limits stipulated in the
agreement. The courts will also frown upon suits which are not filed immediately
after the breach/refusal. The fact that the limitation is three years does not
mean that a purchaser can wait for one or two years to file a suit and obtain
specific performance." The said decision was followed by the Supreme Court in
Rajesh Kumar v. Anand Kumar & Ors.
Limitation Period for Registered Sale Agreement
An agreement to sale which is duly registered cannot be denied in the usual
course. However, Article 59 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides for setting
aside of cancellation of an instrument/decree/rescission of contract. Limitation
period for cancellation of a registered sale agreement is 3 years from the date
when the person came to know about facts which entitles them to a legal remedy.
The Supreme Court in this regard decided the case of
Prem Singh & Ors v.
Birbal & Ors (2006) and held that "Once, however, a suit is filed by a
plaintiff for cancellation of a transaction, it would be governed by Article 59.
Even if Article 59 is not attracted, the residuary Article would be. Article 59
would be attracted when coercion, undue influence, misappropriation or fraud
which the plaintiff asserts is required to be proved. Article 59 would apply to
the case of such instruments. It would, therefore, apply where a document is
prima facie valid. It would not apply only to instruments which are
presumptively invalid."
Award Winning Article Is Written By: Mr.Kishan Dutt Kalaskar
Authentication No: OT430443098341-30-1024 |
Please Drop Your Comments