File Copyright Online - File mutual Divorce in Delhi - Online Legal Advice - Lawyers in India

Right to life: Understanding the Legal Framework of Euthanasia and Patient Rights in India

The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Gian Kaur's case held that the right to life, including the right to live with human dignity, encompasses the existence of such a right up to the end of natural life, which also includes the right to a dignified life up to the point of death, including a dignified procedure of death. This right was deemed to be part of the fundamental right enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution, which we also reiterate. We hold that the Constitution Bench did not express a binding view on the subject of euthanasia.

However, the Constitution Bench noted a distinction between cases where a physician decides not to provide, or to discontinue providing, treatment and care that could or might prolong a patient's life, and cases where a physician decides to administer a lethal drug, even with the intention of relieving the patient from pain and suffering. The latter was held not to be covered under any right flowing from Article 21.

The law of the land, as it exists today, is that no one, including a physician, is permitted to cause the death of another person by administering any lethal drug, even if the objective is to relieve the patient from pain and suffering. An adult human being of sound mind is fully entitled to refuse medical treatment or to decide not to take medical treatment and may choose to embrace death in a natural way.

The right of a patient who is competent to express their views cannot fall outside the scope of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. We are also of the opinion that, in cases involving incompetent patients who are unable to make an informed decision, the "best interest" principle should be applied. Such decisions should be made by specified competent medical experts and implemented after providing a cooling-off period to allow any aggrieved person to approach a court of law.

The right to execute an advance directive by an individual does not depend on any recognition or legislation by the state. We are of the considered opinion that such a right can be exercised by an individual in recognition and affirmation of their right to bodily integrity and self-determination.

Written By: S Kundu & Associates
Email: [email protected], Ph No: +9051244073

Law Article in India

Ask A Lawyers

You May Like

Legal Question & Answers



Lawyers in India - Search By City

Copyright Filing
Online Copyright Registration


LawArticles

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi

Titile

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...

Increased Age For Girls Marriage

Titile

It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...

Facade of Social Media

Titile

One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...

Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...

Titile

The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India: A...

Titile

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a concept that proposes the unification of personal laws across...

Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Legal...

Titile

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors of the economy, and the legal i...

Lawyers Registration
Lawyers Membership - Get Clients Online


File caveat In Supreme Court Instantly