With Amar Sardar at Baruipur Central Jail in the Superintendent's Office
News of this act quickly spread, and I was approached by a reporter from a local
newspaper. When asked about my actions, I expressed my commitment to continue
supporting hapless prisoners in the future. Amar's gratitude was overwhelming.
He never expected that a prison officer would take such a personal interest in
his plight and facilitate his release by covering the necessary expenses. This
unexpected act of kindness left a lasting impression on him and many others.
Upon narrating the incident to my senior officer, the Director General of
Prisons, I faced an unexpected reaction. He questioned why I had personally paid
for the prisoner instead of bringing the matter to his notice. He mentioned that
the payment could have been arranged from the Prisoners' Welfare Fund. His
response made me ponder why such issues did not come to his attention earlier
and highlighted the systemic gaps that left many prisoners languishing in jails
due to non-payment of fines and legal fees.
Motivated by this incident, an initiative was subsequently launched by the DG,
Prisons to identify other prisoners in similar situations. However, despite the
initial enthusiasm, the initiative did not make any worthwhile progress. Over
time, the follow-up actions were forgotten, and the plight of such prisoners
remained largely unaddressed.
This episode underscores a broader issue within the prison system - the need for
more proactive measures to support prisoners who are unable to pay fines and
legal fees. It also highlights the importance of empathy and humanity in the
administration of justice. While rules and procedures are necessary for
maintaining order, compassion should not be overlooked.
From a personal standpoint, this incident reaffirmed my belief in the power of
individual actions, howsoever small, to make a difference. It reminded me that
as public servants, our duty extends beyond mere administration; it encompasses
acts of kindness and support for those in need. The gratitude and relief on
Amar's face were the greatest rewards, far outweighing any bureaucratic
accolades or the small sum of money I paid.
The story of Amar Sardar is not just about one man's release from prison; it is
a call to action for a more humane and responsive prison system. It is a
reminder that behind every case number and file, there is a human being with
hopes, fears, and a desire for dignity. As I continued my journey in the prison
department, I remained committed to standing by those who found themselves at
the mercy of circumstances beyond their control. This commitment is not just a
professional duty but a personal mission to ensure that the values of compassion
and humanity remain at the heart of our justice system.
In closing, my visit to Baruipur Central Jail on that March Day was more than a
routine inspection - it was a reminder of the profound impact we can have on the
lives of others. It reinforced the belief that true justice extends beyond the
courtroom and the prison walls, encompassing acts of kindness that restore faith
in humanity.
Despite the existence of a free legal aid system, its effectiveness is hampered
by several issues. Many lawyers assigned to provide this service rarely visit
prisons to interact with inmates, understand their situations, or offer
emotional support. Consequently, numerous prisoners lack access to adequate
legal counsel and those who do receive it often find their lawyers inadequately
equipped to represent their cases effectively in court. The problem is
exacerbated by the poor and inconsistent payment of fees to these lawyers,
further discouraging their involvement.
Despite their mandate, many judicial officers rarely visit jails to assess the
welfare of prisoners. When they do, their focus often remains on finding fault
of the jail administration, neglecting the crucial aspect of advocating for
infrastructural improvements. Instead of directly engaging the higher
authorities responsible for allotment of fund with specific requests for
increased jail capacity or enhanced facilities, they typically limit their
actions to sending reports to the Director General (DG) of Prisons, leaving the
follow-up and implementation entirely in his hands.
However, the DG operates within a fixed budget and lacks the authority to go
beyond its constraints. The budget is allocated to the DG of Prisons by the
Principal Secretary /Secretary of the prisons' department. They base this
allocation on the budget they get from the state finance department. The prison
is a non-profit organization - an area that doesn't draw much interest from the
higher authorities. As a result, issues related to its development and
upgradation, or even the welfare of prisoners tend to be overlooked since these
do not provide any direct benefits.
By proactively writing to the finance department with specific recommendations
and actively pursuing their implementation, judicial officers could
significantly expedite progress in addressing the infrastructure deficit and
improving jail conditions. If the judicial officers start writing to the finance
department with follow up action regarding shortage of jail officers and
personnel, overcrowding, drinking water shortage, bathing water shortage,
increase in the number of jails and open jails, infrastructural shortcomings,
doctors, medicines, mental health set up, washrooms, toilets, barracks,
lighting, fans, ventilation, sweepers, medicines, gynaecologists, psychiatrists
etc., the condition of jails and prisoners will improve drastically, as the
recommendations of judicial officers are taken more seriously by the finance
department when action taken report is sought.
The urgent need for additional jails, jail officers and personnel, family
quarters for jail staff, doctors, medicines, mental health facilities,
deaddiction centres, washrooms, toilets, barracks, lighting, fans, ventilation,
sweepers, drinking and bathing water facilities, parole for under trial
prisoners, gynaecologists, and psychiatrists should be communicated through
frequent reports to the finance department by the judicial officers. Such
communication would significantly enhance the living conditions of inmates and
the overall functioning of correctional institutions.
Regular observations of judicial officers of both lower and higher courts
highlighting these deficiencies would prompt the finance department to take
sincere steps to resolve them, thereby improving the well-being of prisoners and
jail personnel. By persistently advocating for the necessary resources, judicial
officers can bring about substantial improvements in the conditions of jails and
the treatment of incarcerated individuals. The prompt and effective response
from the finance department on judicial recommendations would result in a
significant reduction of overcrowding, health risks, death in prisons and other
challenges faced by prison populations.
Written By: Md.Imran Wahab, IPS, IGP, Provisioning, West Bengal
Email: [email protected], Ph no: 9836576565
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...
It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...
One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...
The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a concept that proposes the unification of personal laws across...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors of the economy, and the legal i...
Please Drop Your Comments