According to Lombroso's theory of crime, A man is not born a criminal or an
offender, but is made like that. Human civilisation then and now has always been
backed by dearth of access to justice for the weak. In the age where the
disparity between poor and rich exists, each one doesn't hold that power
monetarily to get a learned lawyer to defend oneself even where elementary
facilities of life is hard to maintain.
According to the principles of natural
justice every person should be dealt with equity, justice and good conscience.
Recently Niranaram Chetanram Chaudhary [1]was set free after an SC order
affirmed that he was a juvenile in September 1994, was incarcerated 28 years
since he murdered seven people.
And in the most profound case, father stan swamy
spent 270 days in prison before dying as a jailbird, Delhi riots-accused and
earlier Jawaharlal Nehru University scholar Umar Khalid had been for more than
1000 days behind bars. [2]And just like him there are several prisoners who are
undertrials, and not convicted and yet incarcerated for decades. Well, this is
just a preview inside the prison cells and conditioning offered to the
undertrials and guilty, there is much more not known to the human existence.
Provisions And Statutes Under Law
The accused is afforded a great deal of protection under criminal law, which is
specifically stated in the Indian Constitution. The prosecution must show the
defendant's guilt before the accused is considered guilty. The "presumption of
innocence"[3] is one of the fundamental legal ideas that underpin the accused
person's protection under the law.
According to the concept, the defendant
individual always has the advantage of the doubt and is assumed guiltless until
the trial can establish their fault beyond a rational doubt. The accused
person's lawful protection is a constitutional right guaranteed by the Indian
Constitution and certain criminal law regulations[4]. These rights might be
exercised before the trial, as provided under the CrPC, i.e., the right to
seizure, arrest, etc[5].
The accused is entitled to protection against any
arbitrary and unlawful arrest by a lawful enforcement agency[6]. Criminal law
gives police authorities broad authority to detain and question a suspect
charged with a Cognizable Offence without bringing him before a law officer. To
ensure that police have not abused their authority for personal gain, the Court
should exercise caution throughout an accused person's trial. He shouldn't be
denied any legal rights just because he broke the law or committed an offense.
As a result, criminal jurisprudence offers the accused legal protection during
the inquiry and courtroom trial.
The rights of the defendant during a criminal
trial are clearly outlined under Indian law. There are several criminal law
provisions as well as particular laws that address the subject of an accused
person's rights. Several legal precedents provide the accused during a criminal
trial effective redress. To prevent the innocent person from facing punishment
from the court of law, the legislation includes measures that are applicable
throughout a criminal trial.
To protect and uphold the principles of a fair
trial and natural justice, the Indian courts have also established several rules
and safeguards that must be followed by law administration agencies both at the
time of custody and throughout a criminal trial. These liberties are protected
the accused is given certain rights to lessen his emotional and bodily pain
throughout the legal process. India is one of a country that adopted the idea of
a rapid trial to safeguard the rights of both the defendants and the persecutor.
The state and its agents cannot under any circumstances abandon the decency of
state behaviour in the fight against crime and delinquency and turn to
extra-legal techniques to detain crimes and even offenders. When a state's own
action is wrong, unfair, and unlawful, it should not demand good behaviour from
others. Thus, even the rights of the accused are inviolable in a democratic
society; even if he is charged with a crime, he retains his human dignity.
Constitutional Provisions
Under Article 20(2)[7] Self-incrimination and forced testimonials are prohibited
under the Indian Constitution. It declares that no one who has been apprehended
with a crime will be forced to affirm against themselves. The common law of
American and English jurisprudence that no one should be compelled to submit a
testament that may subject him to criminal suit is thus embodied in Article
20(3)[8]. The defendant has the right to make any voluntary declaration or
admission without being forced to do so during the trial or while they are in
detention.
Further, article 39-A[9] is there providing for the right to free lawful
representation for the accused owing to poor and other destitute circumstances
if he lacks the pecuniary resources to hire or retain a defence attorney before
a court of law. Article 21 of our Constitution, which is made explicit under it,
imposes a responsibility on the state government to offer the accused free legal
representation.
The phrase "
Nemo Bis Punitur Por Eodem Delicto"[10] refers to the idea that none
should never face punishment double for identical transgression or mistake.
According to the double jeopardy theory, a person who has already been tried for
a crime cannot be tried again in a court of law for the same claim or offence.
This rule states that if a person has already been found guilty or cleared of a
crime by a court of law with geographical jurisdiction, any additional
conviction or exoneration for the same crime would be deemed a violation of
Article 20 clause (2) of the Constitution and Section 300 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973.[11]
According to Article 10 of the UDHR[12], everyone has a completely equal right
to a just and public hearing before a tribunal that is autonomous and unbiased,
which will determine his legal civil rights and responsibilities as well as any
criminal accusations that may be brought against him. All people should be
treated similarly before the court and trials, according to Article 14(1)[13] of
the international contracts on public and political rights.
Recent Developments And Landmark Cases
As per the Prison Statistics India 2021[14],. More than 1 lakh prisoners
provided free of cost legal aid. And approx. 1918 convicted prisoners were
rehabilitated and transformed in 2021. Nevertheless, the worth and amount of the
aid provided remains ambiguous. With each passing year the prison inmates
multiplied consequently. From 4,81,387, prisoners it skyrocketed to 5,54,034 in
2021.[15]
Henceforth, there are various organizations, committees, and programs launched
for the accused as well as offenders like; Justice PN Bhagwati committee[16],
Justice Krishna Iyer committee, and others to name a few. Also, District Legal
Services Authority (DLSA)[17],the National Legal Services Authority (NLSA)[18],
and The State Legal Services Authority (SALSA)[19],
The Legal Service Authority Act of 1987[20] was passed by the federal
administration to offer legal aid. A legal framework was also created by this
law to formalize legal aid. The 1994 Amendment Act stipulated that the Act will
go into force on November 9, 1995. The National Legal Services Authority (NLSA)
was founded on December 5th, 1995. its main goal was to create cost- and
efficiency-conscious legal service programs.
Judicial Interpretation
In,
Mohd. Hussain v. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi[21], in which the legal help
counsel was unsuccessful to show up for much of the trial and an additional
attorney was only appointed towards the close of the litigation, brought up the
denial of the right to legal help as well. The tribunal determined that the
representation given in the case violated the prisoner's right to a just hearing
since it amounted to a rejection of the counsel's operative and significant
help.
In
Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain[22], the court said, "Rule of Law is a part of
basic structure doctrine of the constitution of India when there is a defilement
to the fundamental right or civil liberties, only then there is a remedy to go
to the Courts.
In
Sheela Barse v. State of Maharashtra case[23], a PIL was filed in response to
the mistreatment of women inmates in Mumbai's jails. The court issued directives
highlighting the requirement to offer lawful assistance to every prisoner housed
in Maharashtra. The court upheld the constitutional requirement that destitute
defendants suffering the loss of life or liberty get legal representation. To
ensure that they had access to legal aid and to make it simpler for advocates
selected by these Legal Aid Teams to work with detainees who needed legal
support, the court ordered the Maharashtra detention centre to provide a record
of every detainee with an ongoing trial to the district's Legal Aid Committee.
The Mental Healthcare Act of 2017 provides a framework for dealing with the
mental health of prisoners. However, the gap between the communication of the
commandment and reality needs to be linked. According to NCRB data, there has
been a marked surge of 22% of jail prisoners suffering from mental disease.[24]
In the case of
X v State of Maharashtra[25], a division bench of the apex Court
held that the existence of post-conviction mental illness cannot be disregarded
by the government. factors, including overcrowding, a lack of privacy, and
loneliness, have been acknowledged by both the International Red Cross and the
WHO as major factors for the spontaneous growth of psychological ailments.[26]
Analysis
The very basic amenities like- cleanliness and hygiene, telephones, mattress,
fans, eatable food, medical care, even basic lamps are not there. It
consistently pushes the jail inmates in to developing serious mental and
physical issues- torture, alienation, violence, struggle on daily basis to even
committing suicide. Then and now many jurisprudences laid emphasis, from
retributive to reformative justice. And most importantly offering a correctional
treatment, to rehabilitate the offenders.
They all need is counselling and ray
of hope towards the better life ahead. [27] "…no accused person is incapable of
being reformed and therefore, all measures should be applied to give them an
opportunity of reformation in order to bring them in the social stream,"[28] the
Allahabad High Court held in the case of Babu v. State of U.P.[29]
thus, the criminal justice jurisprudence adopted in the country is not
retributive but reformative and corrective, as correctly stressed by the
honourable judicial fraternity.[30] Hence its high time to reconsider the
execution of capital punishment and have another discourse in place of it.
All these provisions, statues, remedies will be of no use if laymen or common
people know it. We must sensitize them about their rights as well as duties so
that they don't fall unto the long trap of ignorance and misery. Hence knowledge
and awareness is the key. Family upbringing, cultural, socio-economic factors,
education are all necessary factors contributing to the mental – physical
wellbeing of an individual.
the question with the Indian Criminal Justice system is not the scarcity of
rules but the lack of organization to implement these laws. Totalling up, the
Indian Justice System has remained somewhat stationary, and there is a need for
a more vigorous structure that not only shields the sufferers of the crime but
also the wrongdoers.
The best and fast way is Spiritual teachings that focus on
altruistic, peaceful, faithful, righteous, blissful and eternal happiness. If
the principles of dhamma, nirvana, Geeta teachings, scriptures, prayers and
meditation are adopted and implemented by the prisoners, these values could help
reform their characters surely.
All the stakeholders of the criminal justice system- the police department, the
courts, the prosecution, the lawyers, and remaining fraternity must adopt a
rigorous and well-coordinated tactic to upgrade the predicament of the
'forgotten souls' i.e., under-trial prisoners, accused who deteriorate in
reformatories unreasonably.[31]
End-Notes:
- 2023 SCC OnLine SC 340
- https://www-livelaw-in.svkm.mapmyaccess.com/articles/father-stan-swamy-uapa-martyr-but-political-prisoners-continue-to-suffer-without-bail-232260?infinitescroll=1 accessed 01 August 2023
- Article 14 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
- Article 22 – right to freedom and personal liberty of the Indian constitution
- Section 50 of CrPC
- Article 21 to 22 of the Indian constitution
- Article 20(2) of the Indian constitution
- Article 20(3) of the Indian constitution
- Article 39-A of the Indian constitution
- "Nemo bis punitur por eodem delicto." A Law Dictionary, legal maxim in United States.
- Section 300 of CrPC
- Article 10 of Universal declaration of human rights
- Article 14(1) of the international contracts on public and political rights.
- National Crime Records Bureau (n 6)
- National Crime Records Bureau, Prison Statistics in India-2021
- Committee of justice PN Bhagwati on legal aid, 1971
- DLSA, Indian gov.
- NLSA, Indian gov
- SALSA, Indian gov.
- Legal service authority act,1987
- AIR 2012 SC 3860: (2012) 9 SCC 408
- AIR 1975 SC 2299
- 1983 SC 378
- Ambika Pandit, '22% rise in number of mentally ill jail inmates: NRCB' Times of India
- X v State of Maharashtra (2019) 7 SCC 1
- https://www-livelaw-in.svkm.mapmyaccess.com/articles/decoding-the-mental-healthcare-act-2017-an-in-depth-analysis-of-indias-mental-health-legislation-233453 accessed 01 August 2023
- 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 498
- 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 365
- ibid
- ibid
- Dr. N. Bhagya Lakshmi (n 29)
Please Drop Your Comments