There are many cases of bailment in our day-to-day life. For example, in the
case of laundry, we give our clothes for getting washed. Once they are washed,
they are to be returned to us. We place the other person in temporary possession
of our clothes for a specific purpose and there is an express or implied
understanding between the two to return the good once the purpose has been
fulfilled. A bailment is a special contract defined under section 148 of the
Indian Contract Act, 1872.
It is derived from a French word i.e. "bailer" which
means "to deliver". The etymological meaning of bailment is "handing over" or
"change of possession of goods". By bailment, we mean delivery of goods from one
person to another for a special purpose on the contract that they shall
reimburse the goods on the fulfilment of the purpose or dispose of them as per
the direction of the bailor. The person who delivers the goods is known as the
bailor. And the person to whom the goods are given is known as Bailee. And the
property bailed is known as Bailed Property.
This article explains the bailment concept and definition. Bailment is a special
type of contract found in Sections 148-181 of the Indian Contract Act 1872.
Section 148 of the Indian contract act defines bailment as " the delivery of
goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they
shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of
according to the directions of the person delivering them."
Bailment means a relationship wherein the personal property of a person
temporarily becomes the possession of another. This sort of relationship can
happen because of a variety of reasons. For example giving a thing for
repairing, leaving ornaments in the possession of a neighbour when you go
somewhere else, delivering garments with dry-cleaning even leaving a cycle or
car in a privately owned stand are examples of bailment.
Contract of bailment involves the transfer of possession of the good from the
bailor to the bailee for a specific purpose and both, the bailor and the bailee,
have been confronted with some rights and duties which are necessary for them to
follow whenever seem suitable. Also, for the contract of bailment to be valid,
all the essential features need to be fulfilled. Moreover, bailment of goods is
different from the sale of goods as bailment is involved with the transfer of
possession while the sale is involved with the transfer of ownership.
Bailment
Bailment consists of the delivery of goods, i.e., movable property, by one
person, who is generally the owner thereof, to another person for some purpose.
The goods are to be returned to their owner after the purpose is accomplished,
or they are to be disposed of according to the directions of the person
delivering them. For example, when you take a fan on hire, or give your suit for
dry-cleaning, or give a watch for repairs, or give a parcel to a carrier for
being transported to some place, there is bailment in each case.
Justice Blackstone defines Bailment as delivery of goods in trust, upon
contract, either expressed or implied, that the trust shall be faithfully
executed on the part of the bailee'. Bailment can also be described as 'the
delivery of goods to another person for a particular use'. Only 'goods' can be
bailed and thus, only movable goods can be the subject matter of bailment.
Current money or legal tender cannot be bailed. Deposition of money in a bank is
not bailment as money is not 'goods' and the same money is not returned to the
client. But the coins and notes that are no longer legal tender and are more or
less just objects of curiosity, then they can be bailed.
In a contract of bailment, the person who delivers the goods is called the "bailor",
and the person to whom the goods are delivered is called the "bailee".
Section 148 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, defines bailment asunder:
148. Bailment', bailor' and 'bailee' defined-A "bailment" as the delivery of
goods by one person to another for some purpose upon a contract that they shall,
when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of according
to the directions of the person delivering them. The person delivering the goods
is called the "bailor', and the person to whom they are delivered is called the
"bailee".
It may be noted here that a contract doesn't need to be entered for a bailor and
bailee relationship to be formed. Just like in any other form of contract,
consideration also forms part of bailment. It is normally given in the form of
money.
Essentials Of Bailment:
- Delivery of goods for some purpose.
"Delivery means the transfer of possession of the goods from one person to
another. Delivery need not always be actual. It may sometimes be a constructive
or symbolic delivery. Section 149 recognizes other than actual delivery also. It
provides:
"The delivery to the bailee may be made by doing anything which has the
effect of putting the goods in the possession of the intended bailee or of
any person authorized to hold them on his behalf."
Transferring of the key of the godown may be deemed to be delivery of the goods.
Explanation to Section 148 gives an illustration of constructive theory
According to this provision: "If a person already in possession of the goods of
another contract to hold them as a bailee, he thereby becomes the bailee, and
the owner becomes the bailor of such goods, although they may not have been
delivered by way of bailment."
- Return of the goods after the purpose is achieved, or their disposal
according to the bailor's directions.
The delivery of the goods, in a bailment, is only for some purpose, eg., for
safe custody, carriage, repair, etc. When the purpose is accomplished, the goods
are to be returned or otherwise disposed of according to the directions of the
person delivering them.
As stated by Section 148, the goods "shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be
returned or otherwise disposed of according to the directions of the person
delivering them." This element distinguishes bailment from other transactions
like the sale of goods, or gifts, where the property in the goods is transferred
and they are not to be returned in any case. In every bailment, the same thing
is to be returned either in the same form or in an altered form.
When the cloth
is given for being stitched into a suit, gold for being converted into
ornaments, or wheat for being converted into flour, there is bailment in each
case. When the money is deposited in a bank, it is not bailment, because the
banker is not to return the same money to the depositor."
Modes Of Delivery (Sec.149)
- Actual delivery:
Transfer of physical possession of goods from one person to
another. Here, the bailor hands over the physical possession of the goods to the
bailee.
Example: A's watch is broken. When he leaves his watch at the showroom for
repair, he has given actual delivery of possession of goods to the showroom.
- Constructive delivery:
If A person is already in possession of the goods of
the owner. Such a person contracts to hold the goods as a bailee for a third
person. Then the such person becomes the bailee, and the third person becomes
the bailor. Constructive delivery is an action that the law treats as the
equivalent of actual delivery.
It can be difficult to deliver intangible In
constructive delivery, the physical possession of the goods may not be handed
over. The possession of the goods may remain with the bailor with the consent or
authorization of the bailee. In constructive delivery, action on part of the
bailor merely puts the bailee in the position of power concerning the bailed
goods. The bailor gives the bailee the means of access to taking custody of it,
without its actual delivery.
Example: A has rare coins in a locked safe-deposit box. Delivery of a safe
deposit box is not possible. When he hands over the keys of the box to B, it is
taken as constructive delivery for purpose of bailment.
Section 149 specifically deals with the constructive delivery of goods. It
states that anything done which has the effect of putting the goods in the
possession of the intended bailee or any other person authorized to hold them on
his behalf is to be treated as constructive delivery of the goods.
Bailment May Be Classified On Two Bases I.E., Reward And Benefit.
Bailments classified based on reward are as follows:
- Gratuitous Bailment:
A Bailment made without any Consideration for the
benefit of the bailor or the benefit of the bailee is called Gratuitous
Bailment. In simple words, A bailment with no consideration is a Gratuitous
bailment. When there is no consideration involved in the contract of bailment it
is called gratuitous bailment.
For example, when you lend your cycle to your
friend so that he can have 3 rides or when you borrow his books to read, it is a
case of gratuitous bailment because no exchange of money or any other
consideration is involved. Neither you nor your friend would be entitled to any
remuneration here. No hire charges are paid by the bailee, and No custody
charges are paid by the bailor.
- Non-Gratuitous Bailment:
Non-Gratuitous is a bailment for reward. It is for
the benefit of both the bailor and bailee. A contract of bailment which involves
some consideration passing between bailor and bailee is called a non-gratuitous
bailment. For example, if your friend hired a cycle from a cycle shop or you
borrowed a book from a bookshop on hire, this would be a case of non-gratuitous
bailment. Hire charges are paid by bailee, or Custody charges are paid by the
bailor.
Based on Benefit based on the benefits accruing to the parties, the contract of
bailment may be divided into the following types:
- Bailment for the exclusive benefit of the bailor:
In this case, the bailor delivers his goods to a bailee for safe custody
without any benefit/ reward. It is called " the bailment for the benefit of
the bailor". This is the case where a contract of bailment is executed only
for the benefit of the bailor, and the bailee does not derive any benefit
from it.
- Bailment for the exclusive benefit of the bailee:
In this case, Bailor
delivers his goods to a bailee without any benefit for his use, it is called
"the bailment for the exclusive benefit of the bailee". This is the case where
the contract of bailment is executed only for the benefit of the bailee and the
bailor does not derive any benefit from the contract.
- Bailment for the mutual benefit of bailor and bailee:
In this case, goods
are delivered for consideration, both the bailor and bailee get benefit and
hence it is called the bailment for the benefit of the bailor and bailee. In
this case, both the bailor and the bailee derive some benefit from the contract
of bailment.
Essential Elements Of Bailment
- Parties:
In a contract of Bailment, a minimum of two parties are necessary
namely the Bailor and the Bailee. Bailor is the person delivering the goods
Bailee is the person to whom the goods are delivered. Goods refer to movables.
- Agreement:
In a contract of Bailment, there must be an agreement between the Bailor and the Bailee. However, the agreement may be expressed (i.e. oral or in
writing) or implied (i.e. inferred from the circumstances).
- Return of Goods:
In bailment, there is only a temporary transfer of
possession. Therefore, the goods must be returned or disposed of according to
the instructions of the Bailor at the end of the bailment.
- Purpose:
In case of bailment, the possession of the goods must be transferred
for some purpose. The purpose may be expressly stated.
- Effecting transfer of possession:
Only possession is transferred from the
bailer to the Bailee i.e the physical commodity.
- No transfer of ownership:
Although the commodity or goods may be in the
possession of the Bailee, the Bailor continues to be the owner.
- Delivery of Goods:
In a contract of bailment, there must be the delivery of
goods. i) The delivery must be voluntary.
Duties Of Bailee
A Bailee Has To Observe The Following Duties:
- Duty to take reasonable care of the goods bailed (Sees. 151-152)
- In the Absence of any Contract:
The bailee is bound to take as much care of
the goods bailed to him as a man of ordinary prudence would, under similar
circumstances take of his goods of the same bulk, quality and value as the goods
bailed. If he has taken care as an ordinarily prudent person, he is not
responsible for the loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods bailed.
- In the case of a Special contract:
The Bailee is bound to take as much care
as provided by the term of the contract. If he has taken the amount of care
described in the special contract, he is not responsible for the loss,
destruction or deterioration of the goods bailed. It is to be noted that the
bailee is bound to take care of whether the bailment is gratuitous or
non-gratuitous.
- Duty not to make unauthorized use of the goods bailed (Secs. 153 & 154)
The bailee must use the goods bailed according to the conditions of the
bailment. If he does not use the goods bailed according to the conditions of the
bailment, he is liable to make compensation to the Bailor for any damage (due to
any reason) arising to the goods from or during such use of them.
- Duty not to mix bailor's goods with his goods (Secs. 155-157)
Case: In case of mixture with Bailor's consent [Sec.155] In case of the mixture
without the Bailor's consent when the goods can be separated [Sec. 156]. In case
of the mixture without the Bailor's consent when the goods cannot be separated
[Sec. 157].
Provision: The bailor and the bailee shall have an interesting proportion to
their respective shares in the mixture thus produced. The property in the goods
remains with the parties respectively, but the bailee is bound to bear the
expenses of separation or division and any damage arising from the mixture. The
bailor is entitled to be compensated by the bailee for the loss of the goods.
- Duty to return the goods on the fulfilment of the purpose (Secs. 160 & 161,
165-167)
The bailee must return or deliver the goods according to the Bailor's directions
without demand, after the accomplishment of purpose or after the expiry of the
period of bailment. If he fails to do so, he is responsible to the bailor for
any loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods from that time.
- Duty to deliver to the bailor increase or profit on the goods bailed (Section
163)
In the absence of any contract to the contrary, the bailee is bound to deliver
to the bailor, or according to his directions, any increase or profit which may
have accrued from the goods bailed
- Duty not to set up any Adverse Title -The bailor is bound to prove that the
other person had a right to goods as against the bailor if he delivers them to a
person other than the bailor.
Sections 168 and 169 confer certain rights on the finder of goods. The
provisions are as under:
- Right of lien. (Section 168):
According to Section 168, a finder of goods has
no right to sue the owner for trouble and expense voluntarily incurred by him to
preserve the goods and to find the owner. He has, however, the right of a
particular lien in respect of those goods. He may retain the goods against the
owner until he receives compensation for the trouble and expense voluntarily
incurred by him to preserve the goods and to find the owner.
- Right of claiming the reward, if announced by the owner. (Section168):
It has
been noted above that the finder has the right to retain the goods until he is
paid compensation for the trouble and expense voluntarily incurred by him to
preserve the goods and find the owner. In addition to that, where the owner has
offered a specific reward for the return of goods lost, the finder may sue for
such a reward, and also may retain the goods until he receives them.
- Right to sell the goods found. (Section 169):
The finder of the
goods has also been given the right to sell the goods found by him under
certain circumstances mentioned in Section 169. Such a right is available to
the finder of the lost goods when the following conditions are satisfied:
- If the owner of the goods cannot with reasonable diligence be found; or if
he refuses, upon demand, to pay the lawful charges of the finder; and
- When the thing is in danger of perishing or losing the greater part of
its value; or when the lawful charges of the finder in respect of the thing
found, amount to two-thirds of its value.
Rights Of Bailee
The duties of a bailor are the rights of a Bailee, and a bailee can enforce his
rights against the bailor by suing him in case of default.
The various rights of
a bailee are as follows:
- Right to claim damages [sec. 150]:
- In case of a gratuitous bailment:
If
the bailor does not disclose the defect in the goods which are known to him and
the bailee suffers some loss due to such defects, the Bailee has the right to
claim damages.
- In case of a non-Gratuitous bailment:
If the bailee suffers
any loss due to any defect in the goods, the bailee has a right to claim
damages.
-
Right to claim reimbursement expenses [sec. 158]:
- In the case of Gratuitous Bailment:
The Bailee has the right to claim reimbursement of all the necessary
expenses (whether ordinary or extraordinary) that he has already incurred
for bailment.
- In the case of Non-Gratuitous Bailment:
The Bailee has
a right to claim reimbursement of all the extraordinary expenses which the
Bailee has already incurred for bailment.
- Right to be indemnified in case of premature termination of
gratuitous bailment [Sec. 159]:
The bailee has a right to be indemnified in case the loss
arising due to premature termination of the gratuitous bailment exceeds the
benefits derived by him.
- Right to recover the loss in case of bailor's defective title [Sec. 164]:
The bailee has a right to be indemnified in case he suffers any loss because of the
defective title of the bailor.
- Right to recover the loss in case the bailor refuses to take the goods back
[Sec.164]:
The bailee has a right to be indemnified in case he suffers any loss
because Bailor refuses to take the goods back.
- Right to deliver goods to any one of the joint bailors [Sec. 165]:
In the
absence of any contract to the contrary, the bailee has a right to deliver back
the goods to any one of the joint owners or may deliver the goods back according
to the directions of one joint owner without the consent of all.
- Right to deliver the goods to bailor in case of bailor's defective title
[Sec. 166]:
If the Bailor has no title to the goods, and the bailee, in good
faith, delivers them back to, or according to the directions of the bailor, the
bailee is not responsible to the owner in respect of such delivery.
- Right to particular lien [Sec. 170]:
Where the bailee has, by the purpose of
the bailment, rendered any service involving the exercise of labour or skill in
respect of the goods bailed, he has, in the absence of a contract to the
contrary, a right to retain such goods until he receives due remuneration for
the services he has rendered in respect to them.
Rights Of A Bailor
The duties of a Bailee are the rights of a Bailor and the Bailor can enforce his
rights against the Bailee by suing him in case of a default.
The various rights
of a Bailor are as follows:
- Right to claim damages in case of negligence [Sec. 152]:
If the Bailee has
not taken reasonable care (in the absence of any special contract) or special
care ( in case of a special contract to that effect), the Bailor has a right to
claim damages for the loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods bailed.
- Right to terminate the contract in case of unauthorised use [Sec. 153]:
If
the Bailee does any act in respect of goods bailed, which is inconsistent with
the conditions of the bailment, the Bailor has a right to terminate the contract
of bailment.
- Right to claim compensation in case of unauthorised use [Sec. 154]:
If the Bailee does not use the goods bailed according to the conditions of the
bailment, the Bailor has a right to claim compensation from Bailee for any
damage arising to the goods from or during such use of them.
- Right to claim separation of goods in case of unauthorised mixture [Sec.
156]:
If the Bailee, without the consent of the Bailor, mixes Bailor's goods
with his goods and the goods can be separated, the Bailor has a right to claim
his goods after separation.
- Right to claim compensation in case of an unauthorised mixture of goods which
cannot be separated [Sec. 157]:
If the Bailee, without the consent of the Bailor,
mixes Bailor's goods with his goods and the goods cannot be separated, the
Bailor has a right to claim compensation from Bailee for the loss of the goods.
- Right to demand the return of goods [Sec. 160]:
The Bailor has a right to
demand the return of goods after the accomplishment of the purpose or after the
expiry of the period of bailment.
- Right to claim compensation in case of unauthorised retention of goods [Sec.
161]:
If the Bailee does not return or deliver the goods according to the
Bailor's directions, after the accomplishment of purpose or after the expiry of
the period of bailment, the Bailor has a right to claim compensation for any
loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods from that time.
- Right to demand accretion to goods [Sec. 163]:
In the absence of a contract
to the contrary, the Bailor has a right to demand any increase or profit which
may have accrued from the goods bailed
Duties Of Bailor:
The Various Duties Of A Bailor Are As Follows:
- Duty to disclose defects [Sec. 151]:
- In the case of Gratuitous Bailment:
The Bailor must disclose all the known defects in the goods - - which materially
interfere with the use of them, or - Expose the Bailee to extra-ordinary risks.
Effect of Non-Disclosure - If the Bailor does not disclose such defects and the
Bailee suffers some loss due to such defects, the Bailor is liable to Bailee for
such loss.
- In case of Non-Gratuitous Bailment:
The Bailor must disclose all the
faults whether known to him or not. Effect of Non-Disclosure- If Bailee suffers
any loss due to any defect in the goods, the Bailor is liable to Bailee for such
loss whether he knows those defects or not.
- Duty to bear expenses [Sec. 158]:
- In the case of Gratuitous Bailment - The Bailor must repay to the Bailee all the necessary expenses ( whether ordinary or
extraordinary) that the Bailee has already incurred for bailment.
- In the case of Non-Gratuitous Bailment - The Bailor must repay to the Bailee all the
extraordinary expenses which the Bailee has incurred for Bailment. It is to be
noted that ordinary expenses are to be borne by Bailee.
- Duty to indemnify the bailee in case of premature termination of gratuitous
bailment [Sec. 159]:
A gratuitous bailment may be terminated by the Bailor at
any time even though the bailment was for a specified time or purpose. The
Bailor must indemnify the Bailee in case the loss arising due to premature
termination of the bailment exceeds the benefits derived by the bailee.
- Duty to indemnify the bailee against the defective title of the bailor [Sec.
164]:
The Bailor is responsible to the Bailee for any loss that the Bailee may
suffer because of the defective title of the Bailor.
- Duty to receive back the goods [Sec. 164]:
The Bailor must receive back the
goods when the Bailee, by the terms of bailment, returns the goods to him. If
the Bailor refuses to receive back the goods, he must repay to the Bailee all
the expenses which the Bailee has incurred for the safe custody of goods.
- Duty to bear the risk of loss [Sec. 152]:
The Bailor must bear the risk of
loss of goods provided the Bailee has taken all reasonable steps to protect the
goods from loss.
Identification Of Contract Of Bailment In Day-To-Day Life:
- Handing over the keys:
We frequently pass on the keys to numerous gadgets
to specific people. For instance, while we skip on our house keys or the keys of
a locker at our residence to any neighbour, t induces the settlement of bailment
among the events, making one the bailor and the other the bailee. Even the act
of turning in the keys of a bicycle or a motorcycle can set off the connection
of bailment.
- Parking lots:
Parking masses may be both paid and unpaid. If the parking
plenty is unpaid, then it will be a gratuitous bailment for the bailor. In that
case, the owner will become the bailor and the proprietor of the parking zone
turns into the Bailee. However, if the car parking zone provider is paid, then
it turns into the same time beneficial bailment for the events. The bailor gives
attention to economic phrases which make the bailee liable to shield the item of
bailment.
- Repair or service:
bailment for restore offerings can amplify a plethora of
goods from cars to machines. All the products that are difficult to regular wear
and tear are a challenge to bailment on behalf of the bailor for repairing.
- Lending items for use:
A contract of bailment which is beneficial only to
the Bailee is also of the nature of gratuitous bailment. In this case, the
bailment is beneficial to Bailee. For E.g. when a friend lends another friend a
bike to be used for some time or a girl lends another girl her jewellery to be
worn for some time.
Termination Of Bailment
A bailment is ended when its purpose has been achieved when the parties agree
that it is terminated, or when the bailed property is destroyed. A bailment
created for an indefinite period is terminable at will by either party, as long
as the other party receives due notice of the intended termination. Once a
bailment ends, the bailee must return the property to the bailor or possibly be
liable for conversion.
Termination of bailment means the bailment comes to end and the legal
relationship of the parties no longer remains. There are various circumstances
under which the contract of bailment is terminated.
A Bailment Is Terminated In The Following Ways:
- On the expiry of a specified period:
If the bailment is for a specific purpose, the bailment terminates as soon as
the purpose is fulfilled.
- On the accomplishment of a specific purpose:
If the bailment is for a specific purpose, the bailment terminates as soon as
the purpose is fulfilled.
- Inconsistent act with the terms:
If the act of bailee is inconsistent with the terms and conditions of bailment,
the bailor can terminate the bailment.
- On the death of either party:
A contract of gratuitous bailment and personal nature may be terminated on the
ground of the death of either party. But, the contract of non-gratuitous
bailment may not be terminated, the liability falls on their legal
representatives.
- On the destruction of subject matter:
If the original condition of the bailed goods does not exist or is destroyed,
the contract of bailment is automatically terminated, because the purpose will
not be fulfilled or the performance of the contract is impossible.
A contract of bailment is terminated in the following cases:
- On the Expiry of the term: Where the bailment is for a specific period,
it terminates on the expiry of that time.
- On the Fulfilment of the Object: The bailment terminates as soon as the
object for which the goods were bailed has been fulfilled.
- On Inconsistent Act: If the bailee inconsistently uses the goods as to
the terms of the contract, the bailment terminates.
- On the Destruction of the Goods Bailed: When the goods bailed are
destroyed or become incapable of use for bailment due to the change in its
nature, the bailment is terminated,
- Gratuitous Bailment: In the case of gratuitous bailment, the bailment
can be terminated by a notice from the owner to the bailee provided the
termination does not cause inconvenience to the bailee.
- On the Death of the Bailor or the Bailee: A gratuitous bailment
terminates on the death of the bailor or the bailee.
Law relating to termination of bailment is discussed in Sees. 153 and 162.
However, these sections are not exhaustive.
Hence ordinary rules regarding discharge or termination of contracts will
also apply in the following cases:
- When the period or purpose is over:
In case the bailment is for a specific period or purpose, it is terminated
on the expiry of that period or the completion of the purpose.
- When the bailee makes unauthorized use of the goods:
In case the bailee makes unauthorized use of the goods bailed, the bailment
is voidable at the option of the bailor.
- When the subject matter is destroyed or becomes illegal:
In case the subject matter is destroyed or becomes illegal, the bailment is
terminated.
- At the will of the bailor:
Where the bailment is gratuitous, it can be terminated merely at the sweet
will of the bailor. However, the termination should not cause loss to the
bailee over the benefit derived by him. In case the loss exceeds the benefit
derived by the bailee, the bailor must compensate the bailee for such a loss
(Sec. 159).
- When the bailor or bailee dies:
A gratuitous bailment is terminated by the death of the bailor or bailee.
Case Laws:
- Sunder Lal v. Ram Sarup, AIR 1952 All 205
A wooden shop was hired under a written agreement that the shop will be
returned in the same condition, and the hirer will be liable for any loss or
damage to it. The shop was burnt by the mob during the communal riots in the
city. It was held that since the destruction of the shop was due to no
negligence on the part of the hirer, he was not liable for the loss.
- Anil Mehra v. Bank of Maharashtra AIR 2003 P H 11, II (2003) BC 570
It has been held that mere hiring of a bank locker would not result in a
contract of bailment. There is no exclusive possession delivered to the bank
and hence there is no question of bailment. Moreover, the bank does not know
the content of the locker, the plaintiff alone knows about that. If the bank
is looted and the hirer of the locker alleges any loss, the bank cannot be
held liable for the same.
- Kaliaporumal Pillai v. Visalakshmi (1938) AIR 1938 Mad 32
A lady took her old jewels to a goldsmith for being melted and converted
into new jewels. Every evening she used to receive the half-made jewels, put
the same into a box and lock the same. She allowed the locked box to remain
on the premises of the goldsmith but kept the key in her possession. One
night the jewels were stolen. It was held that there was no bailment as she
had not handed over the possession of the jewels to the goldsmith, and,
therefore, the goldsmith could not be made liable for the loss.
Suggestions
Since the Indian Contracts Act of 1872 has not defined this issue, and the court
decisions in the above-mentioned cases were not similar, the law commission of
India happened to address this issue
However, the case of what has been described as a quasi-contract of bailment
should be provided for in a separate section stating that the bailor and Bailee
in such cases, must, so far as may be, perform the same duties
The several essentials of a contract will not be present in a quasi-contract
since the primary reason for its enforcement is to obviate the wrongful gain of
any party over another
That in all kinds of bailments, whether or not arising from a contract, the
parties should perform the same duties and be subjected to the same liabilities
and responsibilities as the essence of bailment
Conclusion
The bailee has to perform according to the obligations laid down in the contract
of bailment and as per the law of the land. He is being inconsistent or
negligent while performing his obligation or duty would make him liable under
various provisions of law. In each contract of law, he has certain uniform or
fixed obligations to comply with, and he cannot part with those basic
obligations even if a contract does not provide for any such obligations.
These obligations are the essence of a bailment contract. The obligations might
differ depending on the facts but there are certain duties which are implied,
and reasonable care is to be taken by the bailee. The bailee's responsibility
towards the goods bailed can be increased by way of providing provisions in that
regard but it cannot be lowered down, i.e., he cannot repudiate his
responsibility. Bailment is different from licence and sale.
There are five important duties of a bailor as we have discussed above. A
contract of bailment may be terminated by an act of parties or by operation of
Law. Contract of bailment involves the transfer of possession of the good from
the bailor to the bailee for a specific purpose and both, the bailor and the
bailee, have been confronted with some rights and duties which are necessary for
them to follow whenever seem suitable. Also, for the contract of bailment to be
valid, all the essential features need to be fulfilled.
References
Bibliography:
- Indian Contract Act by Dr R.K Bangia (Publisher- Allahabad Law Agency,
Edition- 15th edition)
Please Drop Your Comments