370. Temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Constitution-
(a) the provisions of article 238 shall not apply now in relation to the state
of Jammu and Kashmir;
(b) the power of Parliament to make laws for the said state shall be limited to—
(i) those matters in the Union List and the Concurrent List which, in
consultation with the Government of the State, are declared by the President to
correspond to matters specified in the Instrument of Accession governing the
accession of the State to the Dominion of India as the matters with respect to
which the Dominion Legislature may make laws for that State; and
(ii) such other matters in the said Lists as, with the concurrence of the
Government of the State, the President may by order specify.
For the purpose of this article, the Government of the State means
the person for the time being recognized by the President on the recommendation
of the Legislative Assembly of the State as the Sadr-i-Riyasat (now Governor) of
Jammu and Kashmir, acting on the advice of the Council of Ministers of the State
for the time being in office.
(c) the provisions of article 1 and of this article shall apply in relation to
(d) such of the other provisions of this Constitution shall apply in relation to
that State subject to such exceptions and modifications as the President may by
Provided that no such order which relates to the matters specified in the
Instrument of Accession of the State referred to in paragraph (i) of sub-clause
(b) shall be issued except in consultation with the Government of the State:
Provided further that no such order which relates to matters other than those
referred to in the last preceding proviso shall be issued except with the
concurrence of that Government.
(2) If the concurrence of the Government of the State referred to in
paragraph (ii) of sub-clause (b) of clause (1) or in the second provision to
sub-clause (d) of that clause be given before the Constituent Assembly for the
purpose of framing the Constitution of the State is convened, it shall be placed
before such Assembly for such decision as it may take thereon.
(3) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this article, the
President may, by public notification, declare that this article shall cease to
be operative or shall be operative only with such exceptions and modifications
and from such date as he may specify:
Provided that the recommendation of the Constituent Assembly of the State
referred to in clause (2) shall be necessary before the President issues such a
Analysis of Article 370 (1)
Article 370(1) in itself gives overriding effect to constitution of India.
However, the Clause a , b , c and d are worth to look into in order to
understand the true depth of its meaning.
Clause a states that Article 238 not applicable to the state of J&K
Clause b provides Power of Parliament to make laws for state of J&K. However,
Clause b is not an absolute Provision in itself and clause b(i) and clause b(ii)
require Parliament to get concurrence or consultation of Government of State of
J&K. Thus, it means that the Parliament is not Powerless to make laws on
matters listed in Union list & concurrent list for State of J&K. However, such a
Power is subject to Concurrence or Consultation of Government of J&K.
Clause c made Article 1 of constitution of India applicable to State of J&K.
Clause d is very important to understand. Clause d can be said as residual Power
of Parliament to make laws for state of J&K. However, Clause d is also not an
absolute Provision and subject to two proviso. The Proviso I to clause d make
its reference to Power of Parliament under Clause b (i) and Proviso II seem like
covering the matters other than those of clause b(i).
Analysis of Article 370(2)
Article 370(2) somewhere conclude and repeat the mandate of Article 370(1). It
briefly states that the Concurrence of State of J&K require for giving effect
the Clause b(ii) or 2nd Proviso to Article 370(1)(d).
Analysis of Article 370(3)
Article 370(3) is key Provision of this Article. It empower the President by
order to either make Entire Article 370 as inoperative or to make it Operative
with some exceptions and modifications. However, again to pass any order under
Article 370(3), the recommendation of constitution assembly of state of J&K is
required which is Practically not possible because the constitution assembly for
State of J&K has dissolved long back in 1950.
What Exactly we understood?
So, the Position is
However, the Other Articles can be made applicable to state of J&K only by two
1. Through concurrence/ consultation of Government of J&K – If Subject is of
instrument of accession.
2. Through only Concurrence of Government of J&K – If Subject is not of
instrument of accession.
So Practically Article 370 cannot be scrapped because Article 370(3) require the
President Order on recommendation of Constitution assembly of J&K which has been
dissolved way earlier.
So, What exactly happened on 5th August 2019?
Knowing that the Article 370(3) Order cannot be passed without recommendation of
Constitution assembly of J&K. Thus, the President has passed an order Article
370(1)(d) to amend Article 367 by adding clause 4 to Article 367.
What is Article 367?
Article 367 is outline certain guidelines to interpret the constitution of
India. Article 367(4) added by President Order under Article 370(1)(d).
It has added that the:
1. Any reference made to Government of State of J&K or Sadar-i-Riyast shall
mean a reference to Governor of State of J&K.
Impact- The Parliament/ President now would required the consent of governor of
state of J&K instead of earlier requirement of that of Legislative assembly.
2. Any reference to Constitution assembly under Article 370(3) shall mean a
reference to legislative assembly of J&K.
Impact- President in order to scrap or to modify Article 370, need the consent
of Legislative assembly for State of J&K. This change has now delete the
Practical impossibility to scrap Article 370 by President Order.
What we understood?
So, the President has passed an order under Article 370(1)(d) to amend Article
367 by introducing Article 367(4). But to apply Article 370(1)(d) , we know
that the concurrence of Government of J&K required.
Since, the State of J&K is under President rule. Hence, it is deemed that the
concurrence of Governor of State of J&K obtained. So due to President Rule in
J&K , it become easier to dodge away the Concurrence Condition under Article
Article 370 is not scrapped since no order has been passed under Article
370(3). However, by virtue of President order under Article 370(1)(d), the
President by amended Article 367 has made the Article 370 as meaningless in
Thus, now the Parliament can make laws for matters as refereed under Article 370
by more easier and convenient way just by getting consent of Governor of State
of J&K. (earlier which was dependent upon whims & mercies of Legislative
assembly of J&K)
E.g.- J&K state reorganization bill, 2019 to bifurcate it into UT of J&K with
legislative assembly and UT of Ladakh without Legislative assembly, is evident
of Parliament Power to make laws easier for J&K.
However, to Scrap the Article 370 in totality, the consent of Legislative
assembly of J&K is still required. (as mandate of Article 370(1)(d)).
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do
not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the
Indian government. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only
examples. They should not be utilized in real-world analytic products as they
are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions
made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of any Indian
Written by: Shubham Budhiraja
The author is company secretary by qualification and is undergoing its
management trainee with a reputed corporate law firm. Further, he is a Second
Year Law student at faculty of law, University of Delhi. He is also enrolled as
Para Legal volunteer with Delhi State Legal Service authority and also active
Participant in Moot Court.
Ph no: +91-9654055315
Email: [email protected]
, [email protected]