Growth hacking is a marketing discipline concerned with a company's rapid
expansion. It is referred to as a process as well as a set of cross-disciplinary
talents which is now being used in election campaigning also. Voter information
is now just as vulnerable to criminal hacks and thefts as financial data, and is
similarly vulnerable to inadequately protected internet infrastructure. In
reality, the issue has indeed spread to a worldwide scale.
While much international media attention has focused on stolen social media
accounts, country engagement in disinformation operations, or vulnerable
equipment, voter rolls is at danger. A deliberate attack, an unintentional leak,
improperly designed privacy controls, or actual loss of devices can all expose
voter data. In most cases, hacked voter data contains delicate and individually
individuals keep, irrespective of the source of disclosure. Data on voters may
be both an asset and a liability in politics.
According to Oxford Internet Institute, social networking media propaganda is
becoming more widespread, including an increasing amount of political parties
using unscrupulous social media algorithms, mechanization, and data science to
control public perception at scale – with grave repercussions for democracies.
The study reveals that, because to digital media's worldwide reach, the
proliferation of disinformation and poisonous ideologies has now become the
problematic contemporary 'standard' for political figures all over the world.
"While deception by political parties has always been a tool for political
rhetoric which is a threat to the democracy of the countries.
Any use of algorithmic manipulation to affect public perceptions via social
networks is becoming commonplace," they say. "Supercomputing propaganda's
strategies and tactics have become a frequent – and probably important –
component of online campaigning and public diplomacy inside an information
technology environment defined by huge quantities of data and restricted degrees
of user engagement and engagement.
To run, democracy need a free media, but the media is under attack from internet
ad behemoths who have disturbed its economic model by allowing them to promote
and monetize any propaganda or garbage information. If you want a perfect storm
hitting democracy, this is it.
GDPR & It's Data Protection Mechanism
The General Data Protection Regulation is the world's most stringent privacy and
security regulation. The GDPR establishes tight guidelines for information
extraction depending on permission. These guidelines are in place to guarantee
that the person understands very well of whatever he or she is agreeing to.
It implies, permission should indeed be voluntarily offered, precise, educated,
and unequivocal, and must be represented in the form of a proposition stated in
clear and straightforward words. Positive acts, including such clicking an
option or completing a document, ought to get consent.
Whenever anyone gives their approval to have their personal information
processed, companies could only use it for the reason described in the
permission. It should also allow them to revoke this permission. As per GDPR, a
system administrator may only hire a data processor who provides adequate
assurances, which must be incorporated in a documented contractual obligation.
A set terms must also be included in the contracts, such as the data processor's
obligation to treat personal data just when ordered to do this by the data
controller. When a firm gets a demand from a person seeking to exercise their
rights following a data breach, the business must react without undue delay, but
in any instance within one month of receipt of the order. For difficult or
repeated requests, the responsiveness may be prolonged by two months if the
individual is advised of the prolongation. Applications must be handled without
If a request is denied, then the company must notify the person why they were
denied and that they have the right to register a dispute to the Data Protection
Authority. GDPR features data protection by design and default, which implies
that companies should consider data protection from the start when developing
new ways to process personal information. In line with this concept, a data
controller shall take all technical and institutional procedures required to
apply privacy principles and safeguard persons' interests. These actions might
involve, for instance, the use of pseudonyms.
This implies that the corporation must always make a most confidentiality option
its standard. In addition, if several security options are available and now one
of them restricts everyone else from accessing personal information, that option
must be selected as that of the standard. Fail to abide with the GDPR may lead
in hefty fines of upwards to EUR 20 million or 4% of your company's worldwide
revenue for specific violations. Additional remedial actions, such as requiring
you to actually process personal information, may be imposed by the Data
Case Study Cambridge Analytica
In early 2018, a breakthrough event inside the case of personal data and data
breach occurred when it was disclosed that Cambridge Analytica had stolen and
utilised personal data from over 87 million people's Facebook accounts for
political gain without their knowledge.
Facts Of The Case
Facebook, the social media behemoth, was created in 2004 by Mark Zuckerberg with
the goal of connecting people and has since grown to become the most popular
social media firm, with over 2.19 billion active users as of early 2018.
Nevertheless, various security issues hampered its expansion over time, one of
which being the Cambridge Analytica data hack.
Cambridge Analytica (CA), a London-based elections campaigning consultant, was
one of several data and analytics firms that exploited data via social
networking websites for academic analysis. As during 2016 United States of
America (USA) presidential elections, the information was purportedly utilised
to micro-target votes in support of Donald Trump. Furthermore, the data was
utilised to sway the Brexit vote in favour of the 'leave' campaign, as well as
the Mexican general elections in 2018.
Legal Action Taken
Facebook's founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, confessed openly for the scandal's
breach of trust with millions of account holders and promised to take steps to
safeguard data. Because of its part inside the Cambridge Analytica controversy,
Fb obligated to give a £500,000 (about $643,000) punishment to the Information
Commissioner's Office in the Great Britain.
The sanction was first imposed in October 2018 is one of the ICO's inquiry on
the use of facebook data for political gain. The penalty was imposed in
accordance with the Data Protection Act of 1998, which set the maximum penalty
that the ICO may impose. Since Cambridge Analytica obtained the information in
2015, the ICO claims it cannot impose a harsher penalty.
Furthermore, SCL Elections Ltd and its connected organisation Cambridge
Analytica submitted an application to initiate bankruptcy processes on Cambridge
Analytica's official website on May 2, 2018. Cambridge Analytica has been the
object of multiple charges and it has been found doing things who are not only
illegal, but also not recognized as a standard component of online advertising
in both political and financial spheres." The organization's faith in its
capacity to operate ethically and lawfully is lacking. The company also lost
nearly all of its customers as a consequence of the media & lawsuits
bombardment. As a result, Cambridge Analytica considers that operating this
company is no longer sustainable.
The Cambridge Analytica scandal prompted governmental authorities to look into
solutions to secure consumers' personal data. As a consequence, on May 25, 2018,
the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was ratified. GDPR regulates
all businesses that handle personal data of Eu nationals. GDPR applies to all
businesses that collect and analyse personal data on a regular basis in order to
construct a user's profile, as well as make decisions for the user, evaluate,
and anticipate users ' preferences.
Cambridge Analytica and the Trump election campaign aren't the only ones who
have benefited from electoral manipulation on social media. Political
advertisements comes in numerous ways and is under examined in India, Facebook, Twitter
etc are an important pair in the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) election
victory in 2014 & 2019
Political campaigns that pay social media giants to promote their material are
one example of a direct form. Advertisement is rapidly being delivered through
individual accounts of people with massive connections and strong levels of
participation, termed "social-media influencers". These agents disseminate
material that typically conceals the fact that it was funded for and by
political campaigns or social networking corporations.
Most of the information required to address such critical issues is now
compartmentalised both in internal and external sources. Simultaneously, most
countries, both physical and virtual, lack adequate information protection of
data security regulations to safeguard rights of people and develop long-term
data usage methods. This is the moment to adopt appropriate data practises that
limit unfavourable repercussions while guaranteeing that next phase of goods and
technologies are designed to maximise benefits while minimising damages and
We are taking chance of perpetuating disinformation for future generations when
we do not start to address issues related to data precision and durability, and
appreciate that data has to be up to standard.
- Social media manipulation by political actors now an industrial scale
problem prevalent in over 80 countries – annual Oxford report | Available
- GDPR | Available at: https://gdpr.eu/what-is-gdpr/
- Raquel Pita Guerreiro Marcelino Duarte | Available at: https://repositorio.ucp.pt/bitstream/10400.14/29693/1/152118129_RaquelDuarte_DPFA.pdf
- The Politicization of Social Media in India | South Asian Voices.