File Copyright Online - File mutual Divorce in Delhi - Online Legal Advice - Lawyers in India

Prisoners Right To Vote: To Be Or Not To Be

An ambiguous situation came forward when a PIL for prisoner’s right to vote came up for admission in Supreme Court on 16th April 2019, by a Law Student.

 It led to a lot of thinking by the Judges as well as the general people, the CJI-led bench posed queries regarding the petitioner, his interest in the subject and reason for choosing the particular cause.

"Before we entertain this petition under Article 32, filed as public interest litigation, we would like to know more about the petitioner; his interest in the subject matter and why he has picked up this particular cause to be raised and that too by an Article 32 petition", said the bench of CJI and Justice Sanjiv Khanna in the order.

The petition was filed by Aditya Prasanna Bhattacharya, a student of National Law School of India University, challenging Section 62(5) of the Representation of the People Act 1951, which says that no person shall vote at any election if he is confined in a prison. The petition states that the Section is broadly worded so as to affect even under trials and persons detained in civil prison.

This provision was upheld in Anukul Chandra Pradhan v Union of India (1997) 6 SCC 1, on the ground that it seeks to achieve the objective of decriminalization of politics. The petitioner argues that the decision is per incursion as the decision did not take into account the fact that right to vote is a constitutional right as per Article 326, and that the decision did not correctly appreciate the challenge on the basis of Article 14. The petitioner also points out that similar provisions curtailing prisoners' right to vote have been struck down by Supreme Courts of Canada and South Africa and the European Court of Human Rights.
As to the author this point seems perfectly valid, and points out a loophole in the legal system and its interpretation.

The prisoners are denied most of the rights, but still are Citizens of India, and as per given this status, they should be allowed to cast vote and choose their leaders. The working of the Police Departments, the situation and living conditions of jails are also an important issue for the prisoners living there.

Our constitution allows the prisoners who are out on bail, The Right to vote, but not those who are still confined, why so? Why this discrimination? Just because most of the does not have enough money and resources to get themselves a Bail? Many of them are in there because of false accusations, less resources to get out. Why are they deprived of this Right?

A serious question to note: If an under trial person can fought for election, why not a prisoner can cast her or his vote.

This is where the difference of opinions comes into view, and this is where the Judiciary needs to looks forward. To Be Or Not To Be

Law Article in India

Ask A Lawyers

You May Like

Legal Question & Answers

Lawyers in India - Search By City

Copyright Filing
Online Copyright Registration


Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...


The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of th...

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi


How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...

Whether Caveat Application is legally pe...


Whether in a criminal proceeding a Caveat Application is legally permissible to be filed as pro...

The Factories Act,1948


There has been rise of large scale factory/ industry in India in the later half of nineteenth ce...

Constitution of India-Freedom of speech ...


Explain The Right To Freedom of Speech and Expression Under The Article 19 With The Help of Dec...

Types of Writs In Indian Constitution


The supreme court, and High courts have power to issue writs in the nature of habeas corpus , quo...

Lawyers Registration
Lawyers Membership - Get Clients Online

File caveat In Supreme Court Instantly