It is settled law that the rights arising out a contract cannot be resolved
through the discretionary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India; especially when disputed questions of facts are involved.
This judgment was pronounced by the division bench of the Chhattisgarh High
Court consisting hon’ble Chief Justice P.R. Ramachandra Menon and Justice Shri
Parth Prateem Sahu in the matter of
Niranjan Lal Agarwal v. Coal India
Limited and others., [W.A 178/2020].
The petitioner in the present writ petition alleged that the Fixed Deposit
Receipt (FDR) which was arranged by the appellant in favor of the respondent
company towards ‘performance security’ was not released by the company even
after issuing the work completion certificate. It was anyway brought up that,
when steps were being taken to release the sum, a few directions were obtained
from the specialists of the GST/Central Excise Department to retain the
installment including the security store, in light of the obligation to be
cleared by the Writ Petitioner to the Government. It was in the said situation,
that the installments were not affected and the FDR was not caused to be
returned/released.
The learned Single Judge observed that there were disputed questions of fact,
which could not be resolved in a proceeding under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India. It was also observed that the reasons for
non-disbursement of the amount due to the Writ Petitioner was because of the
instructions given from the part of the authorities of the Central Government.
In the said circumstance, interference was declined and the writ petition was
dismissed, which is put to challenge in this appeal.
The division bench of Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the observations made by
the learned Single Judge and opined that:
When the Appellant/Writ Petitioner contends that the work involved in the
present tender is admittedly complete (as certified by the Respondent-Company)
but the amount due has not been released, the Respondent-Company contends that
another work order given to the Writ Petitioner came to be terminated ‘at the
risk and cost’ to the Writ Petitioner, for the default committed by him and that
a sum of about Rs.6 Crores is due to the Respondent-Company.
In view of the 4 disputed question of facts, the prayer sought for with respect
to the amounts payable under the final bill cannot be adjudicated by this Court
and hence, interference is not possible. It is for the Writ Petitioner to avail
appropriate remedy before other appropriate forum, in accordance with law with
respect to this head.
The pleadings filed by the Respondent-Company and the submissions made through
the learned counsel do not reconcile with the deeds pursued. We record our
displeasure as to the casual way in which the matter has been dealt with by the
Respondent-Company by way of incorrect or inconsistent submissions as to the
release of the FDR; at the same time, retaining the same at their hands. It may
amount to Contempt of Court as well, where serious action may be necessary in
view of the verdict rendered by the Apex Court in case of
Dhananjay Sharma v.
State of Haryana and Others reported in AIR 1995 SC 1795.
The 4th Respondent is directed to disburse the amount due to the Appellant
towards the FDR forthwith, at any rate within one week thereafter. If there is
any failure on the part of the Respondent-Company in acting as above, it shall
be for the 4th Respondent-Bank to release the FDR to the account of the
Appellant/Writ Petitioner, notwithstanding any such lapse on the part of the
Respondent-Company and such payment will discharge the 4th Respondent from any
liability to the Respondent-Company in connection with the FDR arranged towards
the performance security. The verdict passed by the learned Single Judge stands
modified to the above limited extent.”
End-Notes:
- https://www.primelegal.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/WA178_2027.11.20.pdf
Written By: Prime Legal Law Firm
Off Address: 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka-560001
Phone no: +9986386002, Email:
[email protected]
Please Drop Your Comments