Trade secrets are the Intellectual Property Rights on confidential information
that are capable of being stolen or licensed. Trade secrets help a business to
get a competitive edge over the other existing business in the similar industry.
It is not a hidden truth that the recipe of Coca-Cola was initially known by two
persons and made to available to different stake holders in parts. It was kept
in a security vault at the Trust Company Bank in Atlanta which could only be
opened by the resolution passed by the Boards of directors.[1]
The story of KFC
Chicken is truly remarkable, the recipe after being locked in a safe for nearly
7 decades, the Colonel's handwritten recipe of KFC-Chicken of eleven (11) herbs
and spices was temporarily reallocated to a more secure location and it was
transported in an armored car. It is purported that the recipe of Colonel
Harland sanders
finger-licking is known to only 2 KFC executives. This is the
amount of importance a trade secret carries which can make a business grown in
billion dollars and also turn a billion-dollar business into a full zero. The
definition and Jurisdiction of trade secret depends upon country to country.
Definition of Trade Secret
A trade secret is defined as any information that is not generally to the
relevant business rivals or to the public. It provides some sort of business
benefit on its owner. It seeks to maintain and promote standards of commercial
ethics and fair dealing.[2] One of the key objectives behind protecting is to
provide an add on advantage, rather incentive, for businesses to innovate by
safeguarding the substantial time and capital invested thereon.
Development of Trade Protection Law
The roots of trade secret law have its roots in Roman law was introduced in
1929, that trade secret was protected by a claim known as actio servi corrupti (action
for making a slave worse).[3]It was granted as a commercial relief against
unfair usage by a competitor. It was used to protect slaveholding tradesmen or
landholders from the harm caused by rivals
corrupting a slave, usually through
bribery or intimidation, and causing that slave to turn over confidential
information. This claim was however never accepted in the modern law due to lack
of evidence.
Commonwealth nations
The Court of Appeal of England and Wales was of the opinion that trade secrets
are regarded as an equitable right rather than a property right. Action for
breach of confidence is based on a principle of preserving
good faith. It was
held in the case of
Coco v. A.N Clark (Engineers) Ltd. [4]that following
conditions must be met in order to file a suit for the breach of trade secret:
- The information disclosed itself must have the necessary quality of
confidence about it;
- That information must have been imparted to the party under
circumstances imparting an obligation of non-disclosure;
- There must have been unauthorized use of that information to the
detriment of the party communicating it.
It must be noted that the
quality of confidence highlights the importance of
trade secret. Though, the term wasn't used in direct sense, but it surely brough
out the legal aspect of trade secret.
European Union
The European Union adopted a Directive on the Protection of the Trade Secrets on
27 May 2016. The Directive was accepted by the European parliament after the
proposal of the European Commission. It aims to standardize the national laws in
EU countries unlawful disclosure and use of trade secrets. Without establishing
criminal sanctions, the proposal harmonizes the civil means through which
victims of trade secret misappropriation can seek protection, such as:
- Stopping the unlawful use and further disclosure of misappropriated
trade secrets
- The removal from the market of goods that have been manufactured on the
basis of a trade secret that has been illegally acquired
- The right to compensation for the damages caused by the unlawful use or
disclosure of the misappropriated trade secret.
The goal of the directive is to harmonize the definition of trade secrets in
accordance with existing international standards, and the means of obtaining
protection of trade secrets within the EU.
United States
Trade secrets law evolved under the state common law in the landmark judgement
issued by the United States Supreme Court, Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp[5].,
which allowed the states to freely develop their own trade secret laws. In the
year 1979 several U.S states adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA)[6],
with approximately 47 U.S states adopting variation of it as the basis for trade
secret law.[7]
The Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) codifies the basic principles
of common law trade secret protection .Although the differences between State
laws and the UTSA are generally relatively minor, they can prove case-dispositive:
they may affect which party has the burden of establishing that a trade secret
is not readily ascertainable.[8] Another significant development regarding trade
law in U.S is the Economic Espionage Act (EEA), which makes the theft of a trade
secret a federal crime.
It was specifically enacted for two main purposes theft
of a trade secret for the benefit of a foreign entity (economic espionage, 18 U.S.C. Section 1831), and (2) trade secret theft intended to confer an economic
benefit to another party (theft of trade secrets, 18 U.S.C. Section 1832) In
2016, Defend Trade Secrets Act was passed to create a federal cause of action
for misappropriating trade secrets. The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 created
federal civil cause of action, strengthening U.S. trade secret protection, with
a choice for the parties between localized disputes under state laws or disputes
under federal law, heard in federal courts.[9]
International Law the United States offers a more sophisticated and robust legal
regime protecting trade secrets than most other countries. There is no
international treaty specifically pertaining to the protection of trade secrets.
However, one of the agreements reached during the Uruguay Round of Multilateral
Trade Negotiations (that concluded with the signing of the Marrakesh Agreement
Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO))75 was the Agreement on
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).
TRIPS establish
minimum standards of protection for patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade
secrets that each WTO signatory state must give to the intellectual property of
fellow WTO members.76 Compliance with TRIPS is a prerequisite for WTO
membership.[10]
Factors Responsible to Protect Trade Secrets
The most crucial factors determined by the statistical Analysis of Trade Secret
Litigation in Federal Courts found that confidentiality agreements with
employees and business partners can be taken as reasonable measures to protect
trade secrets. Following factors can be considered to ensure trade secret
protection.
- Non-Disclosure Agreements:
Non-Disclosure agreement with the employees and business partners can form a
greater line of defense and hence protect the overall corporate policy of
the organization in order to maintain confidentiality. Companies shall make
sure that all the policies are followed by the individuals. One of the key
aspects about this agreement could be to return the confidential information
once the employment is terminated.
- Control over physical and electronic access to documents:
Most of the big and wealth organization know that information in physical
and electronic form is very important for protecting trade secrets and other
intellectual property. Companies must ensure and put limitation on the
amount of information that can be accessed by the employees. Company shall
also hire an Information Technology (IT) security system to monitor and
restrict system access.
- Identifying Confidential Information:
It is difficult to protect trade secret unless the information which needs
to be protected has been identified. For that matter, the trade secret must
be documented in an internal registry in a secure environment. An internal
assessment needs to be done to see which department is more vulnerable.
- Due Diligence Criteria:
Only non-disclosure agreements with the employees and business partners is
not sufficient. There are other third parties including suppliers,
distributors and customers. Companies should also include trade secret
protection as part of their due diligence criteria. An organization must be
pro-active in reviewing the information confidential and regularly
communicate about their expectation around trade secrets with thirds
parties.
- Training and Development:
Training and vendor training can be a fruitful technique to teach and
educate the employees, business partners and third parties in handling such
sensitive information. Even a single person breaches the terms and
conditions, the procedural training can be used as a defensive tool for the
company to showcase the active steps taken by the organization to teach the
employees on handling such information.
- SWAT Team:
One of the best practices a company can adopt is to set-up a
cross-functional team that can look at and ensure the protection of trade
secrets. The team can also review and revise the policies on trade secrets.
- Prioritizing trade secrets protection:
Today, digitalization is at its peak and so are cyber threats. To protect
the organization, the company must ensure strong security IT system, put
systems in place and ensure trade secrets protection. This would work as a
mitigation technique and also trade secret protection won't be compromised.
Comparison Between Trade Secret and Patent Protection
One of the bigger confusions for an organization is to choose between trade
secrets and patent protection. The two have more differences than similarities.
Trade secrets are the secret confidential information which generally includes
but not limited to processes, formulas of various things, or any other important
business information which is a key driver for in bringing commercial value to
the business.
Whereas, patents give the owner a special right to produce, sell,
export and restrict the other parties from producing, selling or importing a
particular product or service. Patents and Trade secrets are only two of many
forms of IP rights. Patent protects patentable information by passing eligible
criteria and trade secrets can protect patentable information or any other
unique and special information which can add commercial value to the business.
Patents |
Trade Secrets |
Patent protects new and useful invention |
Trade secret protects valuable and secret
information |
Patent give the patent holder a right to
exclude others from making, selling, using or importing the invention |
Trade Secrets only protect the organization
from fraudulent or misappropriation of information |
Patent is granted only when the information
is made public |
In case of trade secret, the information
remains private and not available to public |
For seeking protection under Patent law,
application is filed at the patent office |
There is no such requirement of filing an
application |
The term of protection is minimum 20 years |
There is no such time limit and trade secret
are perpetual |
Advantages of Patent Protection
- Patent protection grants an exclusive right to the owner of the patent
right holder
- It acts as an effective tool against imitators
- The government provides monopoly protection to the owners over
production, selling and exporting their goods and services
- Patents offers superior protection and cannot be easily infringed
Disadvantages of Patent Protection
- Usually the cost of registration of a patent is an expensive task
- It involves legal costs as well as soft costs to describe the patented
invention
- Patents provide a relatively shorter economic life of 20 years as
compared to other legal rights
- During patent filing, the investor is expected to disclose every minute
details of the patent protection, how the invention works, any specific
problem relating to the invention. The downside of this point that the
competitors will have exact knowledge of the technology or the technique
used in such invention.[11]
Advantages of Trade Secrets
- The first and the foremost use of trade secrets is that it can protect
any sort of information which may not otherwise be protected under any other
IP right
- Unlike patents, trade secrets can contain information such as chemical
formula, customers contact list or any information useful for the
organization in gaining commercial value.
- There is no requirement of disclosure of the information, unlike patents
- Moreover, trade secrets are easy
Disadvantages of Trade Secrets
- Nothing can stop any other organization from independently using the
exact same invention by their own research and development. It means that a
competitor can come up with similar or exact design without breaching the
trade secret of competitor.
- Protecting trade secrets require diligent administration and effective
IT system to monitor the activities and safely preserve the confidential
information.
- Finally, trade secrets acquire no formal recognition like other IP
rights such as patents, copyright, trademark and GI.
Conclusion
Patent Protection is usually preferred when a new invention is brought up by
someone and requires format recognition in order to protect his personal
interest and earn profit to recover the amount spent on such invention. It is
preferred to stop any other person or body corporate to produce the goods with
same technology.
Trade secrets are preferred when the information is not about any new invention,
rather it contains such confidential information which has the effect of
violating the privacy of the company. The organization do not want to use any
other IP right because they do not want to disclose their information to public
at large which is needed in other IP right and requires no formal recognition.
End-Notes:
- Coca-Cola's Formula is at the World of Coca-Cola, The Coca Company,
available
at https://www.coca-colacompany.com/news/coca-cola-formula-is-at-the-world-of-coca-cola
- Trade Secrets, WIPO, available at https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/sme/en/documents/pdf/ip_panorama_4_learning_points.pdf
- Van Lindberg Trade Secrets, https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/intellectual-property-and/9780596517960/ch06.html
- [1968] FSR 415 (Megarry J),https://watermark.silverchair.com/86-2-41.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAqEwggKdBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggKOMIICigIBADCCAoMGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMqKo1zS_GUziYKY5hAgEQgIICVGCKIANWIBKMfNLK8AqTzjkFA86Xoj1MUEVjQIEzL16VSaYnAICPMelnJmCMPIH270J6fZtZfD9e2iU1FWc3xe-Xt7QHHkUAIOOOfctiI1TbYKy5g6IKzPx6_T5HHtIRfHzUo2oOvNaBsAwZG9l7df_6QS-g9x46z4djRczOb1-4iEvPOb6IVbZQv_wWl6BNwDNa2n-xNRbpgyr4h45ClzrU5GkmppyntYMItO4AomQdGJWkY4J7OZAO09FY-4y4TzPLLjepq56ITpGnmr6PLXMJIHWjYxo8qA6KmxNzFSlelb9e52ePQ8qh2Nvuev9ac-d73TquHf7JGF2amhB73G95WI-nY2jeykFS8rGRmhsemveT-4EK989sVPGLYEWGtRbw1bIJfTHnmZ7H6LYCyHMQWs3t6G1Cf3GybHzImhmRo5JagN_0j_0ajjMchCoVv1fUcWdDWFcOX2hxie5abSehW39v5MBaz-K0sNOomQHCSh_9w5G4b-n5LRLOIf40zYrG58KcZcRBklkIWOHKHGtb8gTX365MjcIuKXcu1vr_kXc_Jkza08Gthc9T8gh8mRRN1rKYhq8e_MCWbvQkZosS2iwEMK6re0gRZjyMuZfePlJ1aLlGjwxJrcL9LN5624LPnGR9HOhfg4E8YwU5HZURDpy8npuogKAe3PpaHsAfq0XA2KwmadiWaa20Y_GYGoV3JzZNKLvzTWkwe8cUtqzFE27IHSMwuwJGE5p_EWvhHrAgqiBpjKqXt-uJTwovjQAtgt_baxI4zbvhPPXUOOvUoIMf
- 416 U.S470 1974 https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/intellectual-property-law/intellectual-property-keyed-to-merges/state-intellectual-property-law-and-federal-preemption/kewanee-oil-co-v-bicron-corp/
- Infra 8
- Trade Secrets, Legal Information
Institute, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/trade_secret#:~:text=Overview,Columbia%20have%20adopted%20the%20UTSA.
- https://fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/R43714.pdf
- Trade Secret Policy, United States patents and Trademark office
, https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/trade-secret-policy
- Supra 8
- European IP helpdesk, http://www.iprhelpdesk.eu/node/2188
Written By:
- Abhishek Sharma (5th Semester B.COM+LLB at Chandigarh University,
Punjab) and
- Prof. (Dr.) Chitrapu Kama Raju (Principal IFIM Law College, Bangalore)
Please Drop Your Comments