Licensing is a procedure through which the inventor gives authorization to a
manufacturing entity (be it a company or an individual) permitting them to
extract the benefit out of the licensed product.[1] In other words, it is by
licensing that a patent holder grants permission to an individual or an
organization to make use of his patented invention in exchange for royalties.
Since it is assumed by many, that producing goods by making use of one's own
invention will prove to be more profitable to an inventor in comparison to
licensing it[2], hence one important question that a patentee needs to ask
himself before licensing his patent, is, whether he has enough capital to
involve himself in the business of production? Because it is important for a
licensor to know that licensingis often opted by those inventors, who do not have
enough capital to manufacture their invention at an individual level.[3]Though
royalties arriving in exchange for a licence are negotiable, the licensors might
be paid lesser than manufacturing costs incurred by licensees.
Other crucial questions include as to what commercial role does his invention
fulfill, like, is it an invention that improves products already existing in the
market, or is it completely novel? It is also vital to ask, if one would be
willing to work with several partners (non-exclusive licensing) or not
(exclusive licensing or rights transfer). Once these questions are answered, a
licensor would have a comprehensible framework and can go ahead with further
steps.
Exclusive License:
Exclusive patent license agreements propose the most
protection to licensees but also come with the most accountability and
expectations. An exclusive patent license is an agreement among the licensor and
the licensee stating that the licensor will not practice under the patent
himself or grant other exclusive licenses to other parties. [4]
n this contract, the licensor agrees to give some
specific rights to the licensee but also reserves the right to grant licenses of
the invention and rights concerned to third parties or use it themselves.[5]
It is a category of license issued by the licensee to various
organizations to make the products. Sublicense is a procedure of granting of
certain licensed rights on a product to a third party by the licensee.[6]
A cross-licensing agreement is a contractual arrangement between
two or more parties (company or an individual) in which every party is granted
rights to piece of technology, invention, research, or other subject matter.
Cross-licenses usually take place between companies that hold patents over
various aspects of the same invention. By entering into an agreement, each
company involved can avoid litigation over infringement matters.[7]
In straightforward terms, compulsory licenses are
authorizations granted to a third-party by the Government to formulate, use or
sell a particular product or use a particular process which has been patented,
without the requirement of the consent of the patent owner. Under Indian Patents
Act, 1970 the provisions of ‘compulsory license' are explicitly given under
Chapter XVI, and the terms and conditions that need to be fulfilled are given is
Sections 84-92 of the said Act.[8]
Also applicable for pharmaceutical patents, voluntary
licenses are an act of goodwill towards the world. Patent holders may at their
prudence, license to other parties, on an exclusive or nonexclusive basis, the
right to manufacture, import, and/or dispense a pharmaceutical product. Based on
the terms of the licence, the licensee may act completely or efficiently as an
agent of the patent holder; or the licensee may be free to set the requisites of
sale and distribution within a prescribed market or markets, contingent on
expense of a royalty.[9]
This licensing approach is apt when the potential licensee is not
in practice of the patented invention and does not fall under any compulsion to
take a license. This type of licenses is a marketing strategy where the patent
owner gives the licensee a glance of what could be achieved by acquiring a
license for their patent.[10]
Stick Licensing-Stick licensing is the absolute contrast of carrot licensing.
This tactic of licensing can be utilized when the prospective licensee is
already in use of your patented technology and, thereby, infringing your
patent.[11]
Conclusion
Licensing of Patents can turn out to be a huge benefit for both the licensor and
the licensee as it will earn them huge returns on the investments made by them
on the technology. No matter how much one spends on inventing or marketing it,
if it is not good enough to fulfil a consumer's requirements, then it won't be
good enough to earn royalties or profits to the inventor and manufacturer
respectively.
Also, licensing of patents should be encouraged because, it acts as a boon for
the public at large, because a person's invention might be beneficial for the
society like machinery equipment which reduces the burden of peopleby using them
in their daily life, and sometimes it might be an essential requirement for the
public like medicines.Hence patent licensing should be encouraged by providing
necessary aid and protection to the patentee in the process of licensing his
patent.
End-Notes:
Written By:
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...
It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...
One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...
The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a concept that proposes the unification of personal laws across...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors of the economy, and the legal i...
Please Drop Your Comments