Freedom of press is a deduced or implied fundamental right in India, which
Indian citizens are having by virtue of Article 19(1)(a). The responsibility
of press and media in present day scenario has escalated rapidly because of
the COVID-19 outbreak. Citizens are solely dependent on media and press as
they have no other means to gather information due to the imposition of
lockdown to curb the effects of the lethal coronavirus.
In a very recent interview with journalists from Print Media, our honorable
PM, Narendra Modi asked the media to act as a link between government and
people and provide continuous feedback, at both national and international
level regarding COVID-19[i]. This article is regarding freedom of press, the
critical role of press and media in times of global crisis, and the need for
regulation of press in case of Infodemic in order to mitigate social anxiety
created due to the spread of misinformation related to COVID-19.
Evolution of Freedom of Press in India
The necessity to include of
Freedom of press in constitution was cognized by other countries after
Sweden introduced Freedom of Press Act, 1766 in their constitution on 2nd
December, 1766 and became the first country to ratify Freedom of press into
its constitution. Similarly, in US constitution, there is an explicit
provision acknowledging freedom of press which was adopted on 15th December
1791 by one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.
In India, the framers of the constitution didn’t feel the necessity to
provide an explicit provision for Freedom of press or freedom of media.
The words of Dr. B.R Ambedkar from Constituent Assembly debates reflected
that there is no requirement of any separate law affirming freedom of press:
The press has no special rights which are not to be given or which are not
to be exercised by the citizen in his individual capacity. The editor of a
press or the manager is all citizens and therefore when they choose to write
in newspapers, they are merely exercising their right to expression, and in
my judgment therefore no special mention is necessary of the freedom of
press at all.[ii]
In 1954, a Press Commission was appointed, which enquired into all matters
connected with the working of Press and all aspects of journalism.
Freedom of press in India draws its legitimacy from:
- Preamble
- Article 19 (1)(a) of the constitution
Preamble
The following words of the Preamble indicates that Indian constitution
implicitly includes freedom of press-
Secure to all its citizen the
liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship
Freedom of press falls within the purview of Liberty of thought and
expression. Therefore, the Preamble signifies the necessity of freedom of
press which is further recognized as a human right and as a fundamental
right in the Indian constitution by virtue of 19(1) (a).
Article 19 (1)(a) of the constitution
Article 19 (1) (a): Every
citizen has the freedom of speech and expression.
Freedom of press falls within the ambit of freedom of expression. Therefore,
freedom of press is an implied or deduced fundamental right. Article 19 (1)
(a) is included in the Indian constitution, by the same token, as Article 19
of Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 which states that[iii]:
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right
includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive
and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of
frontiers.
Article 19 (1) (a) has four parts embedded in it:
- Freedom of speech
- Freedom of expression
- Freedom of press
- Right to information
Press is the watchdog to see that every trial is conducted fairly, openly
and above board, but the watchdog may sometimes break loose and has to be
punished for misbehavior.
- Lord Denning[iv]
A very basic principle of Jurisprudence is that no right exists without
certain restrictions. Similarly, the freedom of press is also not unfettered
or absolute and it is subject to reasonable restrictions mentioned in
Article 19(2)[v]. Misuse of this freedom not only imposes civil liabilities
but also has penal sanctions. Following are the reasonable restrictions on
the exercise of the right conferred on citizens by 19(1) (a):
- interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India,
- the security of the State,
- friendly relations with foreign States,
- public order,
- decency or morality or
- contempt of court,
- defamation or
- incitement to an offence
Laws such as the Indian Penal law, law of contempt, Copyright Act , Official
Secrets Act, Freedom of Information Act, Law of torts, Prevention of Insults
to National Honour Act etc limits the freedom of press in India.
Freedom of press and its essence in a democratic country
Freedom of
Press is an Article of Faith with us, sanctified by our Constitution,
validated by four decades of freedom and indispensable to our future as a
Nation.
-Rajiv Gandhi
Freedom of press is acknowledged as the fourth pillar or chamber of
democracy[vi]. The fundamental principle of freedom of press is people’s
right to know. Blackstonian concept and idea[vii] of freedom of press,
expressed in 1769 contained four basic elements which still forms the crux
of the concept of press freedom.
They are as follows:
- Liberty of the press is essential to the state.
- No previous restraints should be placed on the publications.
- That does not mean there is press freedom for doing what is prohibited
by law.
- Every freeman has the undoubted right to lay what sentiment he places
before the public, but if he publishes what is improper, mischievous or
illegal he must take the consequence of his own temerity.
Freedom of press includes right to obtain and publish information, to print
information or opinions or to broadcast or circulate the same. Freedom of
press is relevant to all types of printed and broadcast material, including
books, journals, newspapers, magazines, pamphlets, films, radio and
television programs and social media.
Freedom of press has three essential elements [viii]:
- Freedom of access to all source of information
- Freedom of circulation
- Freedom of publication
Freedom of press is the bulwark of a democratic government. Media acts as a
bridge between the people and the government. In a democratic country like
India, it is a sine qua non for people to get informed about the
governmental actions on day to day basis. In the same manner, the government
officials must also be conversant with the views of its citizens.
People should be given the opportunity to discuss on public matter, which is
possible only when press and media are freely allowed to represent different
points of views, without any interference of the Government. This indicates
that freedom of press is necessary to strengthen the process of democracy.
Indian case laws emphasizing on the importance of freedom of press in a
democracy
The Supreme Court, in a series of judgments since independence,
has strengthened the freedom of the press.
In Indian Express Newspapers Ltd. v. Union of India[ix], Justice
Venkataramiah observed:
In today’s free world freedom of press is the
heart of social and political intercourse. The press has now assumed the
role of the public educator making formal and non-formal education possible
in a large scale particularly in the developing world, where television and
other kinds of modern communication are not still available for all sections
of society.
The purpose of the press is to advance the public interest by publishing
facts and opinions without which a democratic electorate [Government] cannot
make responsible judgments. Newspapers being purveyors of news and views
having a bearing on public administration very often carry material which
would not be palatable to Governments and other authorities.
Patanjali Shastri, CJ, stated in Romesh Thapar vs State of Madras[x]:
Freedom of speech of the press lay at the foundation of all democratic
organization, for without free political discussion no public education, so
essential for the proper functioning of the process of government, is
possible.
The Supreme Court observed in Union of India v. Assn. for Democratic
Reforms[xi]:
One sided information, disinformation, misinformation and
non-information, all equally create an uninformed citizenry which makes
democracy a farce. Freedom of speech and expression includes right to impart
and receive information which includes freedom to hold opinions.
Democracy means Government of the people, by the people and for the people.
Therefore, every citizen must be entitled to participate in the democratic
process and for this reason freedom of press is very crucial for a
democratic county. This demonstrates the constitutional aspect of freedom of
press in India.
Supreme Court Cases prioritizing Freedom of press
In
Sakal Papers
Ltd. v. Union of India[xii],
The Daily Newspapers (Price and Page) Order, 1960, fixed the number of pages
and size which a newspaper could publish at a certain price was stated by
Supreme Court to be violative of freedom of press as the restrictions were
not reasonable under the Article 19(2).
Similarly, in
Bennett Coleman and Co. v. Union of India[xiii],
The validity of the Newsprint Control Order, fixed the maximum number of
pages, and this was struck down by the Supreme Court stating it to be
violative of provision of Article 19(1)(a) as the restrictions imposed were
not reasonable under Article 19(2).
In Express Newspapers v Union of India[xiv]
The Supreme Court held that
a law which imposes pre-censorship or curtails the circulation or prevents
newspapers from being started or require the Government to seek Government
aid in order to survive was violative of Art 19(1)(a).
In
Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras[xv],
Entry and circulation of the English journal Cross Road, printed and
published in Bombay, was banned by the Government of Madras stating it to be
violative of freedom of speech and expression, as without liberty of
circulation, publication would be of little value.
In
Prabha Dutt v. Union of India [xvi],
The Supreme Court directed the Superintendent of Tihar Jail to allow
representatives of a few newspapers to interview Ranga and Billa, the death
sentence convicts, as they wanted to be interviewed.
Role of Press during pandemic
Media and press plays a very vital role in
a society because of the fact that citizens are largely dependent on the
press for getting conversant with what is happening across the globe. Moez
Chakchouk, Assistant Director General for Communication & Information,
UNESCO affirmed that press freedom is now more important than ever and
called on all Member States to ensure that journalists can report on
COVID-19 without interference. In times of health crises, the importance of
accurate and reliable journalism cannot be overstated, he said[xvii]
Journalists out there are doing a commendable job in acquainting people with
the adverse effects of COVID-19 pandemic. They are even risking their lives
in the accomplishment of the process.
Through press and media, the common people, are getting educated regarding
the COVID-19 outbreak in the following manner:
- Making people aware of the COVID-19 symptoms and preventive measures to
be taken,
- Spreading the importance of social distancing and quarantine in order to
mitigate the number of COVID-19 cases.
- Spreading information regarding effective strategies to help individuals
in dealing with social and physical distancing
- Making people conversant with the policies and decisions of the
government.
- Providing regular updates of cases across the globe and chances of cases
getting escalated.
- Prevailing economic conditions due to the COVID-19 apocalypse.
Prime Minister in a very recent interview on 20th March, 2020, with
journalists and stakeholders from Print Media said that media has played a
praise-worthy role in disseminating information to every nook and cranny of
this nation. The network of media is pan-India and spread across cities and
villages. This makes the media all the more significant in fighting this
challenge and spreading correct information about it at micro level.
He laid stress upon the importance of social distancing, asked media to
spread awareness about its importance, inform people about the lockdown
decision by states, and also highlight the adverse effects of spread of the
virus, through inclusion of international data and case studies about other
countries.[xviii]
Need for Regulation of media/ press during COVID-19
Without high
ethical ideals a newspaper is not only stripped of its splendid
possibilities for public service, but may become a public danger to the
community[xix].-
Joseph Pulitzer
The fundamental right of freedom of press is also subject to certain
reasonable restrictions. . In this digital era, due to the technological
advancements, misinformation gets spread within fraction of seconds.
Therefore it is necessary to curb the freedom which citizens are having by
virtue of Article 19(1)(a), at times, in order to combat the spread of
misinformation regarding COVID-19. In the present day context it is very
essential for people to filter out the trustworthy sources of information as
relying upon false information will create a situation of panic, making the
situation even more worse. Before relying on a piece of information
regarding COVID-19,
following verifications must be done:
- Finding out the original source spreading the information or news
- If those information sources are trustworthy and genuine.
- If those information sources are reliable and credible
- Whether those information are relayed accurately
Media and press has also convoluted public understanding of COVID-19 by
spreading unrealistic and fallacious information regarding the pandemic,
thereby making the situation more perplex and panicky.
Due to this, even the Geneva-based World Health Organization (WHO) and the
Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control (CDC) which remain pre-eminently
credible sources of epidemics and pandemics, found itself battling at the
global level because of the infodemic, creating a havoc among the citizens.
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health
Organization (WHO), referring to fake news spreading faster and more easily
than the virus said[xx]
We’re not just fighting an epidemic; we’re fighting an infodemic
People
are being misguided by the spread of conspiracy theories related to COVID-19
and myths regarding the cure of disease and many more. Some of the
innumerable COVID-19 myths, which are clarified by WHO to be myths,
are[xxi]:
- Transmission rate of coronavirus depends on the temperature.
- Taking a hot bath can prevent infection
- Non vegetarian food consumption can lead to infection
- Vaccines against pneumonia protect against novel coronavirus
- The virus affects only the elderly
- The Indian immune system is better than the west and thus Indians will
survive the infection better
Steps taken to combat the spread of COVID-19 related misinformation
Though censorship of press and media is never a good solution in a
democracy, but looking at the panic-mongering situation prevailing due the
outspread of misinformation, the government is asking to do so.
There are two types of censorship:
- Post-censorship: Post-censorship is when something is taken down after
it has been posted because of its deplorable content. They are many laws
dealing with post- censorship where people can be booked and punished.
- Pre-censorship: There are no specific guidelines or statue regarding pre
censorship, hence certain tests are developed by the courts. Pre- censorship
is very rarely ordered by the court.
To tackle the situation, a team of WHO myth busters are working with
search and media companies like Facebook, Google, Pinterest, Twitter,
YouTube and others to counter the spread of rumours, which include
misinformation like: the virus cannot survive in the hot weather, taking a
high dose of chloroquine medication can protect us, consuming large
quantities of ginger and garlic can prevent the virus etc.
International Press Institute is closely monitoring press freedom restrictions
amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Supreme Court of India has also directed the media to refer to and
publish the official version of coronavirus-related developments while
hearing a government plea to vet media coverage.
The Narendra Modi government has sought to both co-opt the media and curb
its reporting in its effort to contain negative Covid-19 coverage. PM
emphasized that it is crucial and necessary to control the spread of
pessimism, negativity and rumour mongering.[xxii]
Conclusion
Freedom of press is known as the bulwark against secret government and is
pivotal for the development of a democratic country like India and is often
described as the oxygen of democracy, without which a democratic society
cannot sustain. Press and media has an indispensable role to play during the
COVID-19 pandemic, and has the responsibility to provide guidance to the
people and assist them to deal with this global health crisis. Also, the
Union ministry of Information and Broadcasting has directed all states and
union territories to set the seal on operational continuity of print and
electronic media amid COVID-19 outbreak, and ensure there is no restraint to
the printing and distribution of newspapers in all cities.
However, there is a need for regulation of freedom of press in the present
day scenario as misleading information related to COVID-19 are spreading
around the world with the speed of light, creating a havoc; thereby
multiplying the burden of trustworthy media sources, as now, those
information sources have the responsibility of not only spreading accurate
information but also countering the misleading information. Therefore it is
very necessary for people to segregate and chalk out the trustworthy and
reliable media sources spreading information related to COVID-19 instead of
blindly believing and further spreading any kind of information.
End-Notes:
- PM interacts with journalists and stakeholders, available at, https://www.narendramodi.in/prime-minister-narendra-modi-interacts-with-print-media-journalists-and-stakeholders-548937
- Constituent Assembly Debates, Vol. VII p 780 (2nd December 1948)
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights, available at, https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
- Lord Denning, Road to Justice,1955 at page 78
- Article 19(2), available at, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/493243/
- Printers (Mysore) Ltd vs Asstt. Commercial Tax Officer, available at,
1994 SCC (2) 434
- Press and the Law (1990) by Justice A.N.Grover; pg 7 para 2
- Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) private ltd. & ors. vs Union of India
and ors., available at, 1985 scr (2) 287
- Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) private ltd. & ors. vs Union of India
and ors., available at, 1985 scr (2) 287
- Romesh Thappar vs Union of India, A.I.R 1950 SC 124
- Union of India v. Assn. for Democratic Reforms, (2002) 5 SCC 294.
- Sakal Papers Ltd. v. Union of India, A.I.R 1962 SC 305
- Bennett Coleman and Co. v. Union of India, (1972)2 SCC 788
- Express Newspapers v Union of India, AIR 1958 SC 578
- Romesh Thappar vs Union of India, A.I.R 1950 SC 124
- Prabha Dutt v. Union of India , (1982) 1 SCC 1
- UNSESCO stresses over safety of journalists amid COVID-19 pandemic,
available at,
https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-stresses-importance-safety-journalists-amid-covid-19-pandemic
- PM interacts with journalists and stakeholders, available at,
https://www.narendramodi.in/prime-minister-narendra-modi-interacts-with-print-media-journalists-and-stakeholders-548937
- Gerald Gross (ed.), the Responsibility of the Press, Clarion Books, New
York,1966,pp.39-40
- UN tackles infodemic of misinformation and cybercrime in COVID-19
crisis, available at,
https://www.un.org/en/un-coronavirus-communications-team/un-tackling-%E2%80%98infodemic%E2%80%99-misinformation-and-cybercrime-covid-19
- Novel Coronavirus outbreak: Myths about Covid-19 from around the world,
debunked, available at,
https://www.indiatoday.in/coronavirus-outbreak/story/novel-coronavirus-outbreak-myths-about-covid-19-from-around-the-world-debunked-1660742-2020-03-28
- PM interacts with journalists and stakeholders, available at,
https://www.narendramodi.in/prime-minister-narendra-modi-interacts-with-print-media-journalists-and-stakeholders-548937
Written By Poulomi Sen, student of Rajiv Gandhi School of
Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur
Please Drop Your Comments