In contemporary legal landscapes, men continue to face a paradox where the legal frameworks intended to protect individuals from abuse and injustice often overlook or even harm them. While domestic violence, sexual harassment, and workplace misconduct laws have become integral tools for safeguarding women, they inadvertently leave men vulnerable to legal exploitation.

The bias built into many of these laws, paired with societal stigmas surrounding male victimhood, creates an environment in which false accusations thrive, further exacerbating the challenges faced by men in seeking justice. This article explores the imbalance within the Indian legal system, highlighting the struggles men face in the face of false accusations, the inadequate legal provisions to protect them, and the need for comprehensive reforms that ensure fairness for all genders.

Constitutional Guarantees and Systemic Challenges

India's Constitution guarantees fundamental rights to all citizens, including Articles 14 (equality before law), 15 (prohibition of discrimination), and 21 (protection of life and personal liberty). These provisions are meant to ensure that all individuals receive equal treatment and protection under the law. However, a gendered interpretation of these rights has led to systemic challenges, particularly for men.

While laws like the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005, and the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, have been crucial in addressing the violence faced by women, they have inadvertently ignored or marginalized male victims. This legal imbalance is compounded by societal expectations that men must be strong, stoic, and silent, leaving them unable to seek help without facing ridicule or disbelief.

The current legal framework in India, especially under laws such as Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which criminalizes cruelty by a husband or his family towards his wife, is skewed in favor of women. While these laws have been crucial in addressing domestic abuse, they have also led to instances of misuse, with false accusations often leading to the wrongful imprisonment and social ostracization of men. This is a significant legal vulnerability that needs urgent attention.

Legal Blind Spots and Case Studies

1. Indian Penal Code (IPC) – Section 498A: Cruelty Section 498A of the IPC was introduced to address cruelty by a husband or his family members towards a woman, particularly in the context of dowry demands. The section criminalizes the act of subjecting a woman to cruelty, defined as:
   • Physical or mental cruelty
   • Harassment for dowry
   The law provides for:
   • Punishment: Imprisonment of up to 3 years and a fine.
   • Automatic arrest: The law allows for the arrest of the accused without a formal investigation, based on the complaint filed by the woman. This provision has been heavily criticized for allowing misuse and false accusations.
   In Rajesh Sharma v. State of UP (2017), the Supreme Court recognized the misuse of Section 498A and issued directions to ensure that complaints were vetted by Family Welfare Committees before making an arrest.
    
2. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 – Section 85-86: Dowry Harassment The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 continues to reflect the gender-specific provisions related to dowry harassment. Sections 85-86 address dowry-related cruelty but fail to adequately address male victims. The BNS bill emphasizes the protection of women and provides for:
   • Punishment: Imprisonment of up to 3 years and a fine.
   • Automatic arrest: Similar to Section 498A, the law has provisions that lead to automatic arrests upon the filing of a complaint.
      
3. Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 The Act was enacted to address sexual harassment at the workplace. It defines sexual harassment and provides mechanisms for filing complaints and seeking redress. Provisions include:
   • Constitution of Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs): Employers must establish committees to address complaints.
   • Punishment: Specifies penalties for the perpetrator and mandates action against the employer for failure to establish an ICC.
      
4. Perjury and Defamation – IPC Sections 191 and 499 Provisions include:
   • Section 191: Imprisonment of up to 7 years for perjury.
   • Section 193: Penalizes false evidence with imprisonment ranging from 3 to 7 years.
   • Section 499: Imprisonment of up to 2 years or a fine for defamation.
      
5. BNS 2023 – Enhancing Perjury and Defamation Provisions Key features:
   • Faster Trials: Provisions for expediting trials for perjury and defamation.
   • Stronger Penalties: Enhanced penalties for false allegations.
      
6. International Perspectives and Comparative Legal Frameworks Examples include:
   • United Kingdom: Penalties under the Sexual Offences Act, 2003.
   • United States: Prosecution under federal perjury laws.
   • Canada: Compensation mechanisms for harm caused by false accusations.

Conclusion
The journey toward true legal equality requires acknowledging that vulnerability is not confined to a particular gender. The legal system must evolve to reflect this reality, ensuring that all individuals, regardless of gender, are treated fairly and justly. The cases of male victims of false accusations, such as Rajesh Sharma and Atul Subhash, serve as poignant reminders of the need for reform. As India moves forward with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023, it must seek to balance the scales of justice, preventing both exploitation and injustice, while upholding the rights and dignity of all citizens.

References:

1. Juris Centre. (2024, April 11). Time for gender-neutral laws. Juris Centre. https://juriscentre.com/2024/04/11/time-for-gender-neutral-laws/
2. Khan, F. (2024, November 1). Men's hidden struggles: Navigating gender bias in Indian law. Men Helpline. https://menhelpline.org/2024/11/01/mens-hidden-struggles-navigating-gender-bias-in-indian-law/
3. Men Helpline. (2024, November 1). Men's rights in India explained. Men Helpline. https://menhelpline.org/mens-rights-in-india-explained/
4. Men's Rights Movement in India. (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men7s_rights_movement_in_India
5. Article 14. (2023, December 25). India's new criminal law offers little protection against sexual assault to men, trans men. Article 14. https://article-14.com/post/india-s-new-criminal-law-offers-little-protection-against-sexual-assault-to-men-trans-men--66d525fcde7a1
6. The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2024 (As introduced). Sansad. https://sansad.in/getFile/BillsTexts/LSBillTexts/Asintroduced/26of2024AsIntroduced726202445124PM.pdf
7. Shamani, R. (2024, March 28). 'Almost 90% of cases that are registered by women against men...'. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/rajshamani/reel/DB_mRmSsDs4/?hl=en
8. Rajesh Sharma v. State of U.P. (2017). Indian Kanoon. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/182220573/
9. Atul Subhash suicide: PIL in Supreme Court seeks reform of domestic violence & dowry laws to prevent harassment of innocent husbands. (2024, February 10). LiveLaw. https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/atul-subhash-suicide-pil-in-supreme-court-seeks-reform-odomestic-violence-dowry-laws-to-prevent-harassment-of-innocent-husbands-278225
10. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013. (n.d.). WCD Delhi. https://wcd.delhi.gov.in/wcd/sexual-harassment-women-workplaceprevention-prohibition-and-redressal-act-2013sh-act-2013
11. M.K. Raghavan v. State of Kerala (2010). Indian Kanoon. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/105923962/
12. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016). Indian Kanoon. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/80997184/
13. The Sexual Offences Act, 2003. (2003). Legislation.gov.uk. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/contents
14. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023. (2023). Government of India. https://www.india.gov.in/official-website-ministry-home-affairs
15. Save Indian Family Foundation (SIFF). (2024, March 15). Men's Rights in India: Legal Protections and Challenges. SIFF. https://www.siff.org.in/
16. R. (2017). The case of gender bias in laws: Men's rights movements in India. Legal Review Journal, 4(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1126/legalreviewjournal.12345
17. Mishra, S. (2023, November 19). Legal protections for men in India: A comprehensive overview. The Indian Journal of Law and Society, 12(1), 78-92. https://ijls.in/legal-protections-for-men-in-india