Indian Succession Act

6. Civil suit by legattee.
Whether maintainable against Administrator
The scope and ambit of sec. 141 fell for consideration on the factual matrix of Himanshu v Sudhansu 2004(1) CHN 626.

There was no dispute as regards the following facts:
  • Both the plaintiff and defendant were appointed as joint executors under the Will.
  • The plaintiff did not join hands as executor to get the probate.
  • On an application by the defendant, probate was granted.
  • As regards the entitlement of legacy also there was no dispute. In spite of the above admitted position the plaintiff brought a civil suit seeking various reliefs including:
    • due administration of the estate,
    • rendition of accounts,
    • injunction etc.
The trial court took up the maintainability of the suit as a preliminary issued and dismissed the suit under Order 7 rule 11 C.P. Code. But, the appellate court set aside the order of dismissal and directed the trial court to decide all the issues involved in the suit. This order of the appellate court gave rise to the miscellaneous appeal before the High Court. The High Court observed:

...there is a specific bar against a legatee to get legacy unless and until he fulfils the terms and conditions under section 141 of The act..if the law is not read in such manner then section 141 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 will have redundant face value. Yet the appellant is not interested to refuse from giving legacy but subject to completion of the administration. But the respondent/plaintiff is not only impatient but also forgetful that unless administration is complete title cannot pass. Therefore, if the legacy is directed to be passed on the strength of this so-called administrative suit keeping the administration under the Will pending, it will be obviously hit by the principles of Order 7, rule 11(d) substantially.

It is crystal clear that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court will be either expressly or impliedly barred.

The Indian Succession Act, 1925 is comprehensive in nature. If one is aggrieved by any action of an Administrator who is appointed for a limited purpose including representing the suits or with an unlimited power, pendente lite, he can very well apply before the court for the purpose of revocation or annulment for just cause. Administrator is a representative of the court on behalf of dead person who can not Carry out the proceedings.

Written By: S Kundu & Associates
Email: soumyakundu16@gmail.com, Ph No: +9051244073

Share this Article

You May Like

Comments

Submit Your Article



Copyright Filing
Online Copyright Registration


Popular Articles

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi

Titile

How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...

Increased Age For Girls Marriage

Titile

It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...

Facade of Social Media

Titile

One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...

Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...

Titile

The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...

Lawyers Registration
Lawyers Membership - Get Clients Online


File caveat In Supreme Court Instantly

legal service India.com - Celebrating 20 years in Service

Home | Lawyers | Events | Editorial Team | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Law Books | RSS Feeds | Contact Us

Legal Service India.com is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act (Govt of India) © 2000-2025
ISBN No: 978-81-928510-0-6