A witness is one of the most important elements in the criminal justice system.
To reach a fair judgement, judges need some evidences or clues that help in
cases, which are provided by witnesses. Without witnesses, many cases would have
to be decided based only on circumstantial evidence, which may not provide a
conclusive result. The testimony of a witness may have a direct impact on an
accused's conviction or acquittal.
Sometimes the accused threatens the witness
and pays for the witness to change his statement in court, which results in not
getting a fair judgement and an innocent person bearing the punishment. For the
purpose of witness protection, the Supreme Court approved the Witness Protection
Scheme in 2018[1]. The aim of this scheme was for the state to provide adequate
protection to the witness.
Witness Protection Scheme, 2018
In order to safeguard witnesses, the Supreme Court adopted the Witness
Protection Scheme in 2018[2]. In the landmark judgement of Mahendra Chawla v.
Union of India, Supreme Court[3] approved this scheme. The scheme offers various
provisions, such as relocation of the witness, alteration of identity, and
providing physical protection to the witness. This scheme requires that
witnesses be adequately protected and that their identities and personal
information not be revealed until the end of the trial.
Except for Jammu and
Kashmir, all states are covered by this programme. This scheme classifies
threats into three categories based on threat perception. Threats to the
witness's and his family members' lives are covered in Category A. In Category
B, threats related to the safety, reputation, and property of the witness or his
family members are discussed. Finally, threats in category C include harassment
or intimidation of witnesses and family members. There is also a provision in
this scheme for a witness protection fund. All the expenses incurred for the
safety of witnesses are paid from this fund.
The Ministry of Housing oversees
this fund in states and union territories. This scheme also allows witnesses to
change their identities at their request. The primary goal of this scheme is to
provide adequate protection to witnesses in order for the justice system to
reach a fair conclusion and hold the accused accountable for his actions.
Need Of The Scheme
In the case of
Zahira Habibullah H. Sheikh and Others v. State of Gujarat[4],
the Supreme Court places a strong stress on the necessity to safeguard the
witness. In this instance, it is asserted that a trial is not fair if witnesses
are threatened and coerced into providing false testimony. The necessity of this
plan is also emphasised in the findings of the Malimath Committee and the Law
Commission of India. Published in 1958, the 14th Law Commission Report served as
the organisation's first document. The Law Commission's 154th, 178th, and 198th
reports all supported the Witness Protection Scheme.
The Malimath Committee
argued for a strong witness protection system in its findings. The testimony of
a witness is crucial in determining the truth of the case and assisting the
judge in reaching a fair decision. So the judicial system needs the protection
of witnesses outside the courts, which helps judges get a fair judgement[5].
Accused parties threaten witnesses to change their statements, as seen in movies
and as occurs in real life also. There are also instances in the film "No One
Killed Jessica" where accused parties make threats and pay money to change their
statements in court. To protect the justice system and also safeguard witnesses,
the Witness Protection Program is needed.
Significance Of The Witness Protection Scheme, 2018
The Witness Protection Scheme, 2018, is a significant step forward for India in
providing necessary protections for witnesses involved in criminal proceedings.
This scheme ensures that witnesses are properly protected and that they can give
their testimony in court without fear of harm to their lives, families, or
property.
This scheme increases the credibility of the justice system in India.
The witness protection scheme allows judges to apply justice fairly, and the
actual perpetrator of the act is punishable. This scheme has been a significant
boost to the judicial system of India, as it promotes trust between the public
and the justice system. Witnesses get the confidence they need to reveal the
true evidence in court with this scheme.
Conclusion:
In any case, a witness is the most important factor in obtaining a final
decision. To ensure a fair decision, the witness must be shielded from the
accused for refusing to change his statement. For the protection of witnesses
and their families from these extraneous factors, the Supreme Court approved the
Witness Protection Scheme.
End Notes:
- What Is Witness Protection Scheme? (The Indian Express, December 6, 2018) accessed February 8, 2023
- India Gets First Witness Protection Scheme (India gets first witness protection scheme - The Hindu, December 5, 2018) accessed February 3, 2023
- Need For A Witness Protection Law In India (Need For A Witness Protection Law In India) accessed February 4, 2023
- Emerging Need for Witness Protection Laws in India – Analyzing the Success and Failures accessed February 8, 2023.
- Witness Protection Scheme in India - iPleaders (iPleaders, December 31, 2018) accessed February 8, 2023.
Please Drop Your Comments