In a recent writ petition, the petitioner challenged the abandonment of their
patent application for a "Blind-Stitch Sewing Machine and Method of Blind
Stitching." The patent application, managed by the firm "Delhi Intellectual
Property LLP," was deemed abandoned due to a failure to respond to the First
Examination Report (FER). This case highlights the critical responsibilities of
patent agents and firms in managing patent applications and ensuring proper
communication with their clients.
Case Background:
The petitioner filed their patent application through Delhi Intellectual
Property LLP, represented by Mr. Chaklan. Despite numerous follow-ups on various
dates in 2022 and early 2023, the petitioner did not receive any response from
the firm regarding the status of their application. During this period, the
petitioner discovered that their application was deemed abandoned due to the
non-filing of a response to the FER.
Legal Responsibilities of Patent Agents:
A crucial aspect of this case is the failure of the patent firm to communicate
the issuance of the FER to the petitioner. The FER is issued after the Request
for Examination (RFE) and contains detailed objections related to novelty,
inventive step, and patentability. The patent agent's responsibility is to
inform the applicant about the FER and to ensure a timely response is filed.
In this case, the firm failed to inform the petitioner about the FER. There is
no evidence on record that the firm communicated the issuance of the FER. The
patent agent's claim of having discussed it over a telephonic conversation is
insufficient, as there is no documented proof of such communication.
Court's Observation:
The court observed that legal professionals' negligence should not penalize
their clients. Citing the precedent from Rafiq v. Munshilal (1981) 2 SCC 788,
the court emphasized that a party should not suffer for the inaction, deliberate
omission, or misdemeanor of their agent. The court recognized that the firm did
not show diligence in managing the petitioner's patent application and failed to
fulfill its obligations.
Court's Decision:
Given the circumstances, the court decided that the revival request filed on
January 28, 2023, should be entertained by the Patent Office within the extended
period of three months. Consequently, the abandonment order was set aside, and
the necessary updates were to be made on the CGPDTM website within two weeks.
Conclusion:
This case underscores the importance of proper communication and diligence by
patent agents and firms. The failure to inform the petitioner about the FER led
to the abandonment of the patent application, causing undue stress and potential
loss of intellectual property rights for the petitioner. The court's decision to
set aside the abandonment order reflects the principle that clients should not
suffer due to the negligence of their legal representatives.
Author's Note:
This case serves as a crucial reminder for patent agents and firms to maintain
clear and documented communication with their clients. It also highlights the
judiciary's role in ensuring that legal professionals' negligence does not
unjustly impact their clients. Going forward, it is imperative for legal
representatives to adhere strictly to their responsibilities and for clients to
stay vigilant about the progress of their applications. The protection of
intellectual property rights hinges on the meticulous execution of procedural
duties by both parties involved.
Case Citation: Saurav Chaudhary Vs Union of India: 04.07.2024: W.P.(C)-IPD
9/2023:2024:DHC:4946:Delhi High Court: Prathiba M Singh. H.J.
Disclaimer:
The information shared here is intended to serve the public interest by offering
insights and perspectives. However, readers are advised to exercise their own
discretion when interpreting and applying this information. The content herein
is subjective and may contain errors in perception, interpretation, and
presentation.
Written By: Advocate Ajay Amitabh Suman, IP Adjutor - Patent and
Trademark Attorney
Email:
[email protected], Ph no: 9990389539
Please Drop Your Comments