A Will, Testament, or Wasiyat is a crucial document in the field of testamentary law and estate planning that expresses an individual's intentions and aspirations for the distribution of their property after death. The Will, which is defined as "an instrument by which a person makes disposition of his property to take effect after his death," occupies a special place in legal systems all over the world, making it easier for assets to be transferred and testamentary intentions to be fulfilled. In addition, Tyabji clarifies what a will actually is by stating that it is the "conferment of the right of property in a specific thing or in a profit or advantage or in a gratuity to take effect on the death of the testator."[1]

This definition underscores the transformative nature of a Will, whereby the testator exercises their autonomy to allocate property and confer benefits upon chosen beneficiaries, with the provisions taking effect only upon the testator's demise. The distinguishing feature of a Will lies in its temporal efficacy and revocability. 'Unlike other modes of property disposition such as sale or gift, a Will remains dormant during the testator's lifetime, springing into effect only upon their death. Furthermore, the testator retains full control over the bequeathed property until their demise, with beneficiaries unable to interfere in any manner with the testator's enjoyment, disposal, or transfer of the assets'[2].

It is only upon the testator's demise that the Will's provisions come into force, directing the distribution of the estate as per the testator's wishes. This characteristic of revocability underscores the dynamic nature of testamentary dispositions, allowing the testator to modify, amend, or revoke the Will during their lifetime, thereby reflecting changing circumstances, preferences, or familial dynamics. Such flexibility ensures that the testator retains agency over their estate, adapting the Will to suit evolving needs or relationships.

Aim and Objective
The aim of this research is to conduct a comparative analysis of the formalities and execution procedures of wills in Muslim and Hindu legal systems. By examining the religious doctrines, legal principles, and customary practices underpinning these two traditions, this study seeks to elucidate the key similarities and differences in the requirements for drafting and validating wills. Furthermore, the objective is to explore the implications of these variations on inheritance rights, familial obligations, and succession planning within Muslim and Hindu communities.

Research Methodology:
This research will employ a comparative legal methodology, integrating doctrinal analysis, case law review, and socio-legal investigation. Primary sources, including religious texts such as the Quran and Hadith for Islamic law and scriptures such as the Manusmriti and Vedas for Hindu law, will be scrutinized to discern the foundational principles governing testamentary practices in each tradition.

Additionally, statutory provisions and judicial precedents from relevant legal jurisdictions will be examined to ascertain the contemporary legal frameworks governing wills in Muslim-majority and Hindu-majority countries. Furthermore, qualitative research methods, such as interviews with legal experts, practitioners, and community leaders, will be utilized to gain insights into the practical application of will formalities within Muslim and Hindu communities. Comparative case studies will be conducted to analyze specific instances of will execution, highlighting the challenges, controversies, and reconciliations between religious norms and legal requirements.

Research Issues:

1. Analysing the Importance and Essentials of Will under Muslim Law.
2. Research and Analysis on the Concept of Limitation in Will and its Difference in Hindu Law
3. Analysing Marz-ul-maut Neither a Legacy nor Will
4. Research and Analysis on Differences and Similarities on Will and Hiba

Mode of Citation
Citations shall follow the preferred citation style of the academic institution or publication, adhering to recognized standards such as APA (American Psychological Association), and Bluebook citation format for legal documents, as appropriate. Additionally, references to religious texts and legal statutes shall be provided in accordance with established scholarly conventions, ensuring accuracy and consistency in citation practices.

[1] Analysing the Importance and Essentials of Will under Muslim Law

Significance
A Will, also known as a Testament or Wasiyat, is a crucial legal instrument that allows individuals to dictate the distribution of their assets after their demise. It grants them control over their estate, ensuring their loved ones are cared for according to their desires. Unlike other methods of property transfer, a Will is revocable during the testator's lifetime and becomes effective only after their death.

The testator maintains full authority over their assets until death, including the freedom to dispose of them without interference from designated beneficiaries, although any such disposition revokes the Will. According to the tradition of the Prophet, the primary objective of a Will is to provide for family members and relatives who may not receive adequate support under inheritance laws. However, caution is advised to prevent unjust harm to legitimate heirs due to preferences shown to certain beneficiaries, which can disrupt familial harmony.

Beyond asset distribution, a Will serves as a means for the testator to modify succession laws, accommodating individuals who may not inherit under conventional rules. This could involve recognizing non-family members or providing for overlooked relatives, reflecting the testator's values and relationships. Formalities surrounding Will creation are relatively flexible in Islamic law. A Will can be verbal or written, with no strict format requirements.

Even a simple verbal declaration can be legally valid, although a written Will, termed a Wasiyatnama, may simplify the process. Signatures or attestations are not always necessary for written Wills, and if attested, registration is typically unnecessary. Establishing the intention of an oral Will is crucial, with a heavier burden of proof placed on those claiming its validity compared to written Wills.

Essentials of Valid Will (Wasiyat)
According to Muslim law, a will's ability to be enforceable is dependent on a number of crucial conditions. These requirements make sure the Will can be successfully enforced and appropriately reflects the testator's (legator's) wishes. Let's examine each prerequisite in more detail:

1. Competency of the Legator: The testator must be of sound mind and legally competent to make a Will. This implies that the testator must have the mental capacity to understand the nature and consequences of making a Will. A testator who lacks mental capacity, such as individuals suffering from insanity or those under undue influence, cannot make a valid Will. Additionally, the testator must have reached the age of majority as defined by applicable laws.
    
2. Capability of the Legatee: The legatee, or the person receiving the bequest, must also be legally capable of receiving such an endowment. This means that the legatee must be legally competent to hold and manage property according to Islamic law. Legatees can include individuals, organizations, or entities capable of owning property under Islamic legal principles.
   }
3. Bequeathable Property: The property being endowed by the legator must be capable of being bequeathed under Islamic law. This typically includes any property that the testator owns at the time of their death and is transferable according to Islamic legal principles. Bequeathable property can include both movable and immovable assets, as long as they meet the criteria outlined in Islamic law.
    
4. Free Consent of the Parties: Both the testator and the legatee must provide their free and voluntary consent to the terms of the Will. This ensures that neither party is unduly influenced or coerced into accepting the terms of the Will. Free consent is essential to the validity of the Will and prevents any disputes or challenges regarding the authenticity of the testator's intentions.
    
5. Testamentary Rights of the Legator: The testator must possess testamentary rights over the property being bequeathed. This means that the testator must have the legal authority to dispose of the property through a Will according to Islamic law. Testamentary rights allow the testator to determine the distribution of their assets upon their death, ensuring that their wishes are carried out in accordance with Islamic legal principles.

Who can be a Legator/Testator
To create a valid Will under Muslim law, the legator must meet certain criteria. Firstly, the legator must be Muslim at the time of executing the Will, though conversion after creation doesn't invalidate it. Secondly, they must be of sound mind, possessing a clear understanding of their actions. The legator should also have reached the age of majority, typically 18 or 21 years old, and must not have attempted suicide prior to making the Will, which may void it under Shia law. Consent of the legator must be freely given, without coercion, and proven in the case of a pardanashin lady. These prerequisites ensure the legal validity and enforceability of the Will, protecting the intentions of the legator and the rights of the legatee.

In the case of Syed Mohiuddin v. Ananta Prasad[3] reaffirmed the essential criteria for the validity of a Will under Muslim law. It clarified that the conversion of the testator after the execution of the Will does not invalidate it, provided the testator was Muslim at the time of its creation. The case underscores the significance of the testator's sound mind, legal age, and freely given consent in ensuring the validity and enforceability of a Will in Muslim law.

Who can be Legatee:
Under Islamic law, several criteria must be met for a person to be eligible to inherit property under a Will. Firstly, the legatee must be alive at the time of the testator's death, ensuring their existence when the Will takes effect. Additionally, the identity and characteristics of the legatee, such as age, religion, or mental state, are generally irrelevant as long as they are legally competent to hold the property. Even an unborn child is considered a competent legatee if they are in the mother's womb at the time of the Will's declaration and are born alive within specific timeframes outlined by Sunni and Shia law.

However, a legatee who causes the death of the testator, intentionally or unintentionally, is generally disqualified from inheriting under the Will. While Shia law may make exceptions for unintentional, negligent, or accidental deaths caused by the legatee, other schools of thought disqualify such individuals. Furthermore, the legatee's consent is crucial before transferring legal title under the Will. Legatees have the right to accept or reject the property bequeathed to them, and their acceptance may be expressed or implied.

In cases where multiple legatees are designated, they can be either joint legatees with specified shares or without specified shares. Specified shares eliminate confusion by explicitly defining each legatee's portion, while unspecified shares typically result in equal distribution among the legatees or their class. These criteria ensure the validity and fairness of property distribution under Islamic law.

[2] Research and Analysis on the Limitation in Will and its Difference in Hindu Law

The main limitations on testamentary powers under Islamic law are related to the maximum amount that can be bequeathed and the need for legal heirs' permission. According to Sunni Islamic law, a Muslim can only leave behind up to one-third of their assets; the other two-thirds pass through intestate inheritance. A Muslim can, however, leave their property to anyone without being constrained by the one-third threshold if they have no legal heirs; however, permission might still be needed for sums that surpass this threshold. This limitation on the bequest amount serves several purposes. Firstly, it aims to ensure that the rights and interests of the legal heirs are protected. By restricting the testator's ability to dispose of more than one-third of their property, Islamic law safeguards the inheritance rights of family members and prevents unfair distribution that could lead to disputes among heirs. Secondly, it maintains a balance between testamentary freedom and the preservation of familial relationships and obligations.

"Moreover, this restriction encourages the testator to consider the welfare of their family members and dependents while making a Will, as it prevents them from disproportionately favouring non-heirs over their rightful heirs. By allowing the majority of the estate to follow the rules of intestate succession, the law ensures that family members are provided for according to the norms of Islamic inheritance.

In contrast, Hindu law does not impose such strict limitations on testamentary powers. Hindu law allows a person to dispose of their property as they wish through a Will, without any predefined percentage restrictions like in Islamic law"[4]. A Hindu testator has the freedom to bequeath their entire estate to any person, including non-relatives, without the need for consent from legal heirs. This provides greater flexibility and autonomy to the testator in distributing their assets.

Additionally, Hindu law does not mandate the consent of legal heirs for bequests made to them in a Will. A testator can choose to Favor one legal heir over others without requiring their consent, unlike in Sunni Islamic law where consent is significant for such bequests. This difference reflects varying cultural and religious traditions regarding property succession and familial relationships between Hindu and Sunni Muslim communities.

Another significant aspect of Islamic law concerning Wills is the requirement for consent from legal heirs when the legatee is also an heir of the testator. This rule aims to prevent feelings of jealousy and enmity among the heirs that may arise if one heir is given preferential treatment in the Will. By seeking the consent of all legal heirs, the testator ensures harmony within the family and reduces the likelihood of disputes over inheritance.

In Shia law, there is no distinction between an heir and a non-heir. A bequest can be made in favor of anyone up to the extent of one-third of the property, and it is considered valid without the need for consent from legal heirs. This approach provides more flexibility and autonomy to Shia Muslims in distributing their assets compared to Sunni Muslims, who are subject to stricter limitations on testamentary powers.

[3] Analysing Marz-ul-maut Neither a Legacy nor Will

A notion deeply ingrained in Islamic jurisprudence, Marz-ul-Maut clarifies the complex interplay between testamentary succession and gift in situations where death is imminent. Marz-ul-Maut is a complex structure based on the Sharia that regulates how assets are distributed to those who are terminally sick. It is guided by the ideals of equality and foresight. In an effort to clarify Marz-ul-Maut's relevance within the larger context of Islamic jurisprudence, this article will explore the fundamental components, jurisprudence, and circumstances that define it.

At its core, Marz-ul-Maut encapsulates the essence of testamentary succession intertwined with the urgency of imminent demise. Unlike conventional gifts or wills, Marz-ul-Maut is predicated upon the genuine apprehension of death in the mind of the transferor. It manifests when an individual, stricken by a severe ailment fraught with the Specter of mortality, seeks to allocate their assets judiciously. The Sharia imposes stringent conditions to ensure the integrity and fairness of such transfers, embodying the ethos of equitable distribution inherent in Islamic inheritance laws.

Critical to the validity of Marz-ul-Maut is the presence of three pivotal conditions: proximate danger of death, subjective apprehension of imminent demise, and external indicia signifying the deteriorated condition of the transferor. The interplay of these elements delineates the contours within which Marz-ul-Maut operates, safeguarding against potential abuse or exploitation. The Sharia mandates that the illness must be grave, engendering a legitimate fear of death, thereby precluding transfers borne out of transient ailments or apprehensions.

Important instances that clarify the applicability and subtleties of Marz-ul-Maut have enhanced the body of knowledge in the field of legal scholarship. In Shaik Nurbi v. Pathan Mastanbi, the court outlined the necessary circumstances, stressing the need for both subjective perception and outside signs of impending death. On the contrary, the appeal court dismissed the applicability of Marz-ul-Maut in Shaikh Tufail Ahmad v. Mt. Umme Khatoon, citing the lack of genuine apprehension due to abrupt demise[5].

To further ensure compliance with Islamic injunctions regarding fair distribution, Marz-ul-Maut places restrictions on the amount of assets that can be sold. Due process and equity must come first in testamentary dispositions, as Sharia requires that the net worth of the transferred property not be greater than one-third of the entire assets. Moreover, heirs' approval

'Marz-ul-Maut, a significant concept in Muslim Laws, hinges on specific conditions and circumstances. When a person, incapacitated by a severe illness and harboring genuine apprehension of imminent death, bestows a gift, it falls under Marz-ul-Maut. Notably, old age-induced demise doesn't qualify. These gifts, exempt from taxation, require the transferor's apprehension of death, not attendees. Crucially, the illness leading to Marz-ul-Maut gifts mustn't extend beyond a year. Marz-ul-Maut gifts blend aspects of Hiba (gift) and will, necessitating delivery of possession and adhering to testamentary restrictions. This hybrid nature underscores its unique legal character within Islamic jurisprudence.'[6]

[4] Comparative Analysis of Hiba and Will

In both Hindu and Muslim legal systems, Hiba (Gift) and Will are fundamental instruments used for the transfer of property. While both serve the purpose of asset disposition, they differ significantly in their nature, legal formalities, revocability, and effect. This article aims to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of Hiba and Will in Hindu and Muslim laws, elucidating their respective features, similarities, and distinctions.

Similarities
Despite their different implementation and historical implications, Hiba (Gift) and Will show notable similarities in Muslim law. The aforementioned commonalities highlight the essential tenets that regulate the transfer of property and testamentary disposition in Islamic legal theory. First of all, a Muslim's intention to allocate assets in accordance with religious and personal preferences is reflected in both a will and a hiba, which involve the voluntary transfer of property. Both the Hiba and the Will serve as means of demonstrating generosity and providing for loved ones or charitable purposes, although the Hiba is carried out while the donor is still alive and the Will becomes effective after death.

Secondly, the Hiba and Will's validity depends on meeting certain legal requirements and procedures. In order to verify the transfer of property, donors must make sure that legal norms are followed, whether they are filing a Hiba deed or creating a Will in compliance with established legal procedures. This involves taking into account the donor's mental ability, lack of compulsion, and adherence to any formalities required by Islamic law.
Moreover, the goal of helping chosen receivers or beneficiaries drives both Hiba and Will. Whether leaving assets through a Will or a Hiba during one's lifetime, contributors aim to uphold Islamic values of compassion and charity by supporting their heirs, family, and charitable causes.

Moreover, the consideration of heirs and family members is central to both Hiba and Will. While donors retain the autonomy to distribute assets according to their wishes, Islamic law imposes limitations and guidelines to ensure equitable treatment of heirs and adherence to the principles of inheritance prescribed by Sharia. Lastly, both Hiba and Will may be subject to legal challenges or contestations if their validity is questioned. Allegations of coercion, lack of capacity, or improper execution may prompt legal intervention to uphold the integrity of property transfer and ensure compliance with Islamic law.

Differences
The fundamental legal system controlling the transfer of property in both Hindu and Muslim law are the will and the hiba (gift), each of which has its own set of formalities, consequences, and time-related effects.

1. Registration and Formalities: Hiba usually needs to be registered and stamped in order to be legitimate under both Hindu and Muslim law. This procedure protects against future challenges by guaranteeing the gift deed's legitimacy and validity. On the other hand, although it could be necessary in some jurisdictions for evidentiary purposes, a Will does not always require registration. For a Will to be valid and enforceable, witnesses must be present, and certain legal conditions must be followed during execution.
    
2. Type and Timing: Hiba entails the immediate transfer of property ownership from the donor to the donee, taking effect upon execution. In contrast, a Will constitutes a testamentary disposition of property to be implemented only after the death of the testator. While Hiba operates during the lifetime of the donor, a Will's provisions come into effect posthumously, guiding the distribution of assets according to the testator's wishes.
    
3. Revocability: Once a Hiba is completed, it is generally irrevocable, granting the donee absolute ownership of the gifted property. Conversely, a Will can be changed or revoked by the testator during their lifetime, affording flexibility to modify testamentary intentions in response to evolving circumstances or preferences.
    
4. Effect and Execution: The effect of a Hiba is immediate upon execution, with the transfer of property ownership finalized upon proper execution and registration of the gift deed. In contrast, the provisions of a Will take effect only upon the death of the testator, with the appointed executor responsible for executing its terms and distributing assets to beneficiaries as per the testator's wishes.
    
5. Nature and Considerations: Hiba can be executed by any person of sound mind and legal capacity, typically reflecting voluntary and benevolent intentions towards chosen recipients. Conversely, the drafting of a Will requires careful consideration of familial relationships, legal requirements, and testamentary intentions, subject to scrutiny to ensure validity and compliance with applicable law.
    
6. Challenges and Validity: Both Hiba and Will may be subject to legal challenges or contestations. A Hiba can be challenged if the gift was not made voluntarily or in accordance with the donor's wishes, while Will may be contested on various grounds such as lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence, fraud, or improper execution.

Case Reference: An illustrative case is "Rani Purnima Debi vs. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Deb," which underscores the significance of testamentary freedom under Hindu law. In this case, the court upheld the validity of a Will bequeathing the entire estate to a stepson, despite objections from natural sons. The case elucidates the autonomy afforded to testators in disposing of their property through a Will, highlighting the importance of testamentary capacity and the absence of undue influence.[7]

Recommendation
To enhance the efficacy and fairness of testamentary practices within Hindu and Muslim legal systems, several recommendations emerge: Firstly, legal formalities and procedures governing wills and Hiba deeds need clarification. Clear guidelines issued by lawmakers and legal practitioners would enable individuals to understand their rights and obligations better, reducing the risk of disputes arising from procedural uncertainties. Secondly, initiatives to increase public awareness and education regarding the importance of wills and Hiba deeds in estate planning are essential.

Legal literacy programs and community outreach initiatives can empower individuals to make informed decisions about property and succession planning, encouraging more people to formalize their testamentary intentions. Thirdly, streamlining registration processes for wills and Hiba deeds is crucial. Simplified procedures would make these instruments more accessible and user-friendly, promoting legal certainty and facilitating the efficient transfer of property.

Moreover, legislative reforms should enhance the protection of testamentary freedom while safeguarding the rights of heirs and beneficiaries. Clear guidelines on revocability and limitations on testamentary powers can prevent abuse or exploitation while respecting individual autonomy and preferences. Additionally, promoting alternative dispute resolution mechanisms for resolving inheritance conflicts is essential.

Mediation and arbitration services offer efficient solutions, preserving familial relationships and minimizing the burden on the judicial system. Lastly, individuals should be encouraged to seek professional assistance when drafting wills or Hiba deeds. Expert guidance can ensure compliance with legal requirements, minimize errors, and facilitate smooth estate administration.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the comparative analysis of wills and Hiba deeds within Hindu and Muslim legal systems reveals both similarities and differences in their formalities, execution, and implications. While both instruments serve the purpose of property transfer and testamentary disposition, they are governed by distinct legal frameworks shaped by religious doctrines, cultural practices, and historical contexts.

The analysis underscores the importance of legal clarity, public awareness, streamlined registration processes, and enhanced protection of testamentary freedom to promote fairness and efficiency in property transfer. By addressing these recommendations, stakeholders can contribute to a more transparent, equitable, and effective testamentary system. Ultimately, the goal is to empower individuals to make informed decisions about their assets and succession planning while preserving familial relationships and upholding the principles of justice and equity. Through collaborative efforts between lawmakers, legal practitioners, and the community, testamentary practices can be strengthened, ensuring the orderly transfer of property and the fulfillment of individuals' testamentary intentions within Hindu and Muslim legal systems.

End-Notes:

1. Shiva, Last visited 26th March 2024 20:37pm. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-251-concept-of-will-under-muslim-law.html
2. ibid
3. Syed Shah Ghulam Ghouse Mohiuddin And ... vs Syed Shah Ahmed Moriuddin Kamisul 1971 AIR 2184
4. Rani Purnima Debi vs. Kumar Khagendra Narayan Deb. 1962 AIR 567
5. Shaikh Tufail Ahmad vs Mt. Umme Khatoon and Ors. AIR 1938 ALLAHABAD 14
6. Rai, D. (2020, November 15). Marz-ul-Maut - neither a gift nor a legacy. iPleaders. https://blog.ipleaders.in/marz-ul-maut-neither-a-gift-nor-a-legacy/ Last visited 28th March 2024 10:04 am.
7. 1962 AIR 567

Written By: Shreya Kumari