Have you ever thought about the way international contracts are formed and
how their structure impacts the way global business is conducted? Standard forms
of contracts have become a popular approach for international agreements,
especially given the complexities of commerce conducted across borders.
Standard forms are a great way to save costs, but they need modifications in
order to comply with different countries laws. In this article, we'll explore
what they are, how they work in various countries and their implications for
international business. A standard form contract is a take-it-or-leave-it
agreement between two parties that cannot be negotiated.
It is also known as an adhesion contract or boilerplate contract and is usually
used when there is an unequal power dynamic between the two parties. Such
contracts are legally binding agreements requiring one side to do something,
with the more powerful side writing the agreement in their own favour.
Whether you're a business owner looking to streamline your operations or an
individual working on a global project, understanding how standard forms of
contracts and their adaptations around the world can benefit you is essential
knowledge. So let's dive right in and explore the world of standard forms and
their implications both legally and financially.
Recently, the law of contract has faced an issue that is becoming more and more
prevalent: the widespread use of standardized forms for concluding contracts.
This leaves individuals with little to no choice but to accept whatever
conditions are outlined in the form, giving large companies an advantageous
position to exploit the weaker side with terms that may even exempt them from
all liability. To protect these individuals' interests, courts have created
rules to safeguard them.
A common feature of commercial relationships, standard form contracts (SFCs)
have been a product of organised trade in some fields such as marine shipping
and banking for many centuries, and, more recently, in others such as mass
production industries as a form of service contract between companies or for
What Are Standard Forms of Contracts?
If you're involved in global business transactions, chances are you've come
across "standard forms of contracts" (or SFCs). But what exactly are they and
what implications do they have?
Simply put, standard forms of contracts are written agreements that cover the
most common areas of a business transaction. They usually include elements such
as product or service descriptions, payment options, the timeline for delivery
and consequences for breach of contract. Many international companies rely on
these universal forms to facilitate cross-border deals.
What makes SFCs so useful is that they provide a way for businesses to
streamline their processes - it's a single agreement that can be adapted to fit
different deals all over the world. This means, once signed, there's no need for
further negotiation. Furthermore, with their standardized structure and
language, it ensures compliance with international law and avoids legal disputes
between two parties.
One of the defining features of SFCs is that they are assumed to be exempt from
negotiation based on their fixed clauses and facilitation of routine
transactions.2 SFCs have many positives for industry: they encourage trade by
increasing transactional efficiency and, as they are presented on a
'take-it-or-leave-it' basis, significantly decrease transaction costs.3
In short: Standard Forms of Contracts make global deals simpler and more
reliable - provided both parties read through the document carefully before
The natural course of these forms of contracts is economically efficient for
business transactions and less perplexing. Innumerable positive objectives like
its economic efficiency, cost-cutting and almost zero negotiation quality
associated with SFCs make it prevalent and preferred in the contemporary world.
However, these forms of contracts have become very deceptive with the advent of
the digital world. People click on the "I Agree" button on various digitalized
standard forms of contracts daily on the internet. They don't even realise that
they have entered into a contract. If you ask them whether they have ever in
their life entered into any contract with anyone. The plain answer to most of
them remains negative. Therefore, these forms of contracts always put one party
at the higher end, this party has usually greater bargaining power.
Despite its use in highly efficient regularised systems, contract law generally
has no complete descriptive or normative theory; instead, it is generally viewed
as a remedial 'institution' whose function is to adjudicate any issues that
arise between two individuals or entities after transactional activity.4
Foundationally it rests on an idea called 'freedom of contract,' which promotes
the facility of individuals to transact without the interference of oversight
systems such as government institutions5. Broadly, then, contract law sees its
goal as one of enabling the "power of self-governing parties to further their
shared objectives through contracting"6. Contract law is seen as embodying this
tension between freedom of contract and the ability or need for sovereign or
third-party entities to intervene in their governance 7.
To put simply, the 'Standard form of Contract' is in general a contract which is
pre-fixed, non-negotiated, and based on uniformly set conditions by a party to a
contract against anyone who wishes to enter a contract with him.
For instance, whenever we download any 'Application' from the google play store
or online, it comes with a kind of 'Standard Form of Contract' displayed as
'Terms and Conditions'. These 'Terms and Conditions' are in standardised form
for everyone who wishes to use that App. Only if we agree with it, we can use
the application and not otherwise. These "Terms and Conditions' are pre-printed,
equal for all customers and non-negotiable.
How Do Standard Forms of Contracts Vary Across the World?
Standard forms of contracts act as a starting point for many international
transactions; however, the contents of these forms can vary widely depending on
the country in which they are used. For example, some countries have laws that
limit the ability of parties to contract out of liability for certain types of
damages or losses, meaning that certain clauses may not be enforceable.
Similarly, some countries may have laws that require prior notification to
workers and other affected parties prior to any changes in a contract.
In addition, there are often differences in terms related to governing law. This
means that a standard form of contract used in one country may not be suitable
for use in another due to legal requirements and preferences specific to that
jurisdiction. Understanding how standard forms of contracts differ across
jurisdictions is an essential step for any business engaging in international
Unlike India, many countries across Europe and parts of the world have made
specific legislation to adopt and regulate SFC.
Black's Law Dictionary defines them as a standard form contract prepared by one
party, to be signed by another, usually a consumer, who, being in a weaker
position, adheres to the contract with little choice about the terms. These
contracts are loosely interpreted by courts in favour of weaker parties.
In India, any kind of contract can be executed provided it fulfils the
essentials under Indian Contract Act. Therefore, the Standard forms of Contracts
in general keep an equal position in the Indian scenario. Very similar to any
In the words of the Supreme Court of India, 'the 'standard form' of the contract
is the rule. One must either accept the terms of the contract or go without.
Since it is not feasible to deprive oneself of such necessary services, the
individual consumer is compelled to accept those terms. In view of this fact, it
is quite clear that freedom of contract is now largely an illusion.8
The Uniform Commercial Code of the United States provides specific provisions
for SFCs. Companies must carefully examine SFCs to determine whether they are
enforceable. A two-step process is followed.
If the contract contains terms and conditions that a reasonable person would not
expect, and if the parties are contracting unequally, it is not enforceable.
Furthermore, terms are evaluated according to their purpose, prominence, and
circumstances. In addition, the doctrine of unconscionability is applied in
deciding what we have already discussed.
To address the problems associated with the standard form of contracts, the
Israeli government has used both judicial and administrative approaches.
Israel then enacted a statute to deal with "restrictive terms" and "standard
contracts", covering a large number of contracts or agreements that try to offer
a service or product and where the terms are already decided by the other party.
With this, the novelty of Israel lies in the formation of an administrative
board to help and assist the Israeli courts in the matters of standard
contracts.In addition to approving restrictive terms, the Board represents both
the company/supplier and the consumer in the process. And is directed to see
whether these contracts or terms are not prejudicial to anyone.
This system of the administrative board is efficient and useful. It is a very
positive step in adjudicating such contracts as it is uniform in its results and
also in the quality of adjudication.
The United States is also considering and examining this system in order to
apply it in their system. However, there are various implementation issues
related to it which makes Israel special in maintaining and keeping this dual
While some countries like China are quite reluctant in terms of using SFCs on
global markets. The People's Republic of China has not yet formulated any
Commercial Code. And also its law sources have reduced in number over the past
few years. But not trading with international markets and companies. Thus the
companies of P.R.C. use intensive use of Standard Forms of Contracts. It can
also be seen through studies made by law experts on the policies and legal
practices of P.R.C.10
What Are the International Transaction Implications?
You might be interested in learning how standard contracts affect cross-border
business. It's crucial to keep in mind that different nations frequently have
different laws and regulations, which may have an impact on the enforcement of
these contracts if issues emerge.
Rules of Choice
The rules of choice are a very important factor when it comes to contract
formation and enforcement in other jurisdictions. This is because, typically,
contracting parties will agree on which law applies to their contract to give it
Unfortunately, due to the nature of international transactions and different
laws in different countries, parties may not be able to agree on a single
law�but they will usually reach an agreement as to which courts should have
jurisdiction over any disputes that may arise. This is why it is important for
parties using standard forms of contracts in an international context to
consider adding a choice of law clause.
Depending on the specific country or jurisdiction, some court systems may not
enforce a contract that has been agreed upon by means other than a traditional
signed document or even one that contains an arbitration clause. So it's
important for parties entering into international transactions with standard
forms of contracts to ensure all legal requirements are met before doing so.
Are There Different Types of Tenders?
Did you know that not all Standard Forms of Contracts are the same from country
to country? Depending on where your business is located, there are likely
different types of tenders and legal implications to consider.
For example, Design-Build Contracts in the US refer to the use of one contract
for the design and construction services between two parties, while European
countries like Germany offer a two-contract approach. Then there's Project
Management Contracting, which is found in Asia and can include both the project
management role as well as the construction role.
And don't forget about Single Source Procurement or the Traditional Tender�the
latter being mostly a matter of jurisdiction. There are also various hybrids in
between, each with its distinct contractual arrangement and legal implications
depending on where you're located.
If you're thinking about entering into a new international transaction and
making use of Standard Forms of Contracts, it's important to familiarize
yourself with what type of tender applies for your region�and then consult a
qualified lawyer in regard to any accompanying legal issues.
How Can Standard Forms of Contracts Be Adapted to Different Situations?
It's reasonable to wonder how common contract formats can be modified to fit
certain circumstances. The answer is that, while keeping the protections they
provide, the forms can be altered to meet the requirements of a particular
transaction. They may also be written in a style that is simpler to comprehend
than conventional legalese. This is significant because it shows that everyone
who will be a member of the agreement is aware of their rights and obligations.
There are several ways this can be done:
- Lawyers and Legal Advisors:
Lawyers and legal advisors are well-versed in the law and understand how to
properly customize contract documents for particular circumstances. They can
also provide advice about the terms of an agreement or dispute resolution
processes if needed.
Consultants specialize in developing standard forms of contracts for
particular uses or industries. For example, a consultant may develop an
oil-and-gas operating agreement tailored specifically to a region or
country's legal system, rather than just adopting a standardized form.
- Software Platforms:
Software platforms like Documate provide automated legal document solutions
that are designed to make the process of managing contracts faster and
easier by allowing users to easily generate custom agreements without having
to have any prior knowledge of contract law or writing skills.
What Potential Issues Could Arise With Standard Forms of Contracts?
Standard form contracts (SFCs) are a common feature of commercial relationships.
They are made up of regularised or commonly used clauses that are written by one
party with the
expectation of acceptance by the other, often without the latter reading the
terms. They are assumed to be exempt from negotiation and are an important part
of the world's economic landscape, accounting for 99% of all contracts used in
commercial and consumer transactions. They have many positives for the industry,
such as increasing transactional efficiency and significantly decreasing
transaction costs. Contract law is a remedial 'institution' whose function is to
adjudicate any issues that arise between two individuals or entities after
When it comes to international transactions, there can be certain legal
implications and potential issues that could arise when using standard forms of
contracts, such as:
If a customer or supplier of a party to the contract is dissatisfied with the
terms and conditions of the contract, they may seek to bring the case to court.
If so, it's up to the parties in agreement to decide which court or legal system
they'll use. How do you know you're making the right choice?
Disputes can arise from not leaving enough room for negotiation, or due to any
unforeseen events happening before or during the performance of the contract.
The parties must agree on how these disputes are going to be resolved (through
arbitration, mediation etc). This should be discussed beforehand and should
provide options for how these disputes can be resolved without unnecessary
delays or costs.
Language barriers pose a challenge when drafting international contracts that
are legally binding in more than one country. Parties must ensure that
misunderstandings don't occur due to their language differences, as well as make
sure that they use unambiguous terminology to prevent any confusion or
In short, adopting a global contract template comes with inherent risks but also
has its advantages if done right. Companies need to ensure they stick within the
legal bounds in each country, take care of any potential issues that could arise
and find ways around language barriers when necessary.
In conclusion, standard contract formats are crucial in the realm of
cross-border business. Businesses can quickly and securely enter into contracts
with international companies by adjusting them to various national legal
Nonetheless, while working with international contracts, parties should proceed
with prudence and be sure to take into consideration their particular legal
needs. To that end, business owners should seek the advice of knowledgeable
attorneys to make sure their contracts are legitimate, applicable, and current.
Standard forms of contracts can be an essential resource in the field of
cross-border commercial operations with the right planning.
- Burke, J.A. (2000). Contract as Commodity: A Nonfiction Approach. Seton
Hall Legislative Journal, 24, 285
- D'Agostino, E. (2015). Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics.
Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Hillman, R. A. & Rachlinski, J. J. (2002). Standard-Form Contracts in
the Electronic Age. New York University Law Review, 77(2), 429-495
- Griffin, R. C. (1978). Standard Form Contracts. North Carolina Central
Law Journal, 9, 158-177.
- Kessler, F. (1943). Contracts of Adhesion--Some Thoughts about Freedom
of Contract. Columbia Law Review, 43(5).
- Eisenberg, M. A. (1994). Expression Rules in Contract Law and Problems
of Offer and Acceptance. California Law Review.
- Lonegrass, M. T. (2012). Finding Room for Fairness in Formalism�The
Sliding Scale Approach to Unconscionability. Loyola University Chicago Law
- Delhi Transport Corporation v. DTC Mazdoor Congress, 1991 Supp (1) SCC
- Columbia Law Review Association Inc., Comment: Administrative Regulation
of adhesion contracts in Israel,
- Smith Alan H, Standard Form Contracts in International Commercial
Transaction of The People's Republic
- : http://www.jstor.org/stable/757629
Please Drop Your Comments