Geneva Conventions And War Crimes
The four international treaties known as the Geneva Conventions, which were
signed in 1949, lay down the humanitarian ideals and safeguards for wartime
victims. Regardless of their political inclinations, these conventions founded
the Red Cross and other humanitarian organizations to aid and care for those
harmed by war and violence.
The agreements also designated a number of actions as war crimes, such as intentional injury to civilians, the maltreatment of prisoners of war, and the employment of weapons that inflict needless suffering. These laws safeguard society's most defenseless citizens and hold people responsible for their conduct during armed conflict.196 nations have ratified the Geneva Conventions, which continue to constitute a cornerstone of international humanitarian law.
The Geneva Conventions characterize war crimes as serious violations of the Conventions, including violations of some fundamental values, such the purposeful infliction of pain or humiliation onto an individual or group. killing prisoners of war, torturing people, mistreating civilians, and other cruel or inhumane acts committed against people during a war are examples of war crimes.
According to international humanitarian law, war crimes are major violations of the rules and traditions of war. They can lead to personal criminal liability and are among the most serious crimes according to international law. The main sources of international humanitarian law are the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols, as well as customary international law.
Examples of war crimes include:
Attacks on civilians or civilian objects:
Deliberate attacks on civilians or civilian objects, such as homes, schools, and hospitals, are considered war crimes.
Torture and inhumane treatment:
The intentional infliction of severe physical or mental suffering on prisoners of war, civilians, or other protected persons is a war crime.
Taking hostages:
Taking and holding hostages is considered a war crime, as it violates the principles of humanity and the protection of civilians.
Using prohibited weapons:
The use of chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons is prohibited and considered a war crime under international law.
Forced displacement:
Forcing civilians to leave their homes or territories is considered a war crime and violates their right to freedom of movement.
Sexual violence:
Rape, sexual slavery, and other forms of sexual violence are considered war crimes and violate the principles of humanity.
Enforced disappearances:
The kidnapping and detention of individuals without due process, followed by their disappearance, is considered a war crime.
The United Nations (UN) Security Council created the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) as an ad hoc international criminal tribunal in 1993 to try war crimes committed during the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s.
Between 1991 and 2001, genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes were all crimes that fell within the purview of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Ethnic cleansing, mass murder, sexual assault, and other acts of violence against civilians are some of the most heinous crimes that the ICTY has prosecuted.
The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), which was established after the Nuremberg Trials after World War II, played a significant role in establishing international criminal justice as a means of holding people accountable for grave breaches of international humanitarian law.
The ICTY prosecuted 161 people throughout its existence, including senior military and political figures, and delivered a number of historic judgments. The work of the ICTY has aided in the evolution of international criminal law and helped to clarify what constitutes a war crime.
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTY) and the ICTY closed their doors in 2017 after completing their mandates, and their respective tasks were passed to the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals, which was formed to carry on their work (ICTR).
In conclusion, the ICTY was essential in ensuring that those responsible for the worst atrocities committed during the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia were brought to justice and in establishing international criminal justice as a means of fostering adherence to international humanitarian law and safeguarding victim rights.
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) was an international court formed by the UN in November 1994 to try those accountable for the 1994 Rwandan Genocide and other significant transgressions of international humanitarian law.
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) had its headquarters in Arusha, Tanzania, and ran until its mandate expired on December 31, 2015, at which point it was replaced by the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals. The ICTR was the first international criminal tribunal established to deal with genocide, and it has helped shape international criminal law via its activities.
The treaty that created the International Criminal Court (ICC), a permanent international tribunal to try people for the most serious international crimes, including genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, is known as the Rome Statute. It was approved by 123 states as of 2021 after being adopted on July 17, 1998, in Rome, Italy.
Crimes committed by individuals on the soil of or by citizens of nations that have accepted the Rome Statute 11 fall under the purview of the ICC. In addition to national criminal jurisdictions, the ICC only serves as a prosecutor when national courts are unable or unwilling to do so. The ICC aims to hold individuals accountable for the most severe crimes and contribute to the prevention of such crimes in the future.
International conventions that define the requirements of humanitarian law to be followed in armed conflict are the 1949 Geneva Conventions and its Additional Protocols. They outline the duty of the parties to the conflict to uphold these protections and offer protections for those not participating in the hostilities, such as civilians, ill and injured soldiers, and prisoners of war.
Murder, torture, and cruel treatment of people who are protected by the Geneva Conventions are just a few examples of the significant transgressions that constitute war crimes. The legal foundation that establishes the bounds of appropriate conduct during armed conflicts is the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, and infringement of these articles are punishable as war crimes. Other international and national criminal institutions, notably the International Criminal Court, have the authority to bring cases against people for war crimes, including those committed during armed conflicts.
Briefly stated, the Geneva Conventions set forth the laws of war and safeguard people during armed conflicts, and violations of these laws are regarded as war crimes.
The four international treaties known as the Geneva Conventions were established in 1949 and offer protection to those who have been injured or killed in armed conflict. The treaties, which have been accepted by practically all nations in the world, are regarded as the foundation of contemporary international humanitarian law.
The Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field: This convention covers the protection of sick and wounded soldiers on the battlefield, including the establishment of medical units and the protection of medical personnel.
The Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea: This convention covers the protection of sick, wounded, and shipwrecked military personnel at sea.
The Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War:
This convention covers the treatment of prisoners of war, including the protection of their lives, dignity, and humane treatment, as well as their rights to correspondence, food, and medical care.
The Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War:
This convention covers the protection of civilians in times of war, including the protection of their lives, dignity, and humane treatment, as well as their rights to food, medical care, and protection from violence.
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), a free-standing humanitarian organization, was also created by the Geneva Conventions to oversee their application and enforcement. The ICRC is in charge of encouraging adherence to the treaties and aiding armed conflict victims.
Modern international humanitarian law is based on the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, which also offer crucial safeguards for armed conflict victims like civilians, prisoners of war, and injured troops. These safeguards are intended to lessen the effects of conflict and to guarantee that people are treated with respect and dignity under any circumstances.
The four international treaties known as the Geneva Conventions were established in 1949 and offer protection to those who have been injured or killed in armed conflict. The Geneva Conventions' expanded and clarified provisions are outlined in two additional treaties known as the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions, which were signed in 1977.
The First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions (Protocol I), which is applicable when two or more governments are engaged in armed conflict, addresses the protection of victims of international armed conflicts. In addition to the ban on indiscriminate strikes and attacks on civilian targets, it offers extra protection for people.
When a state engages in armed conflict with non-state armed organizations, Protocol II, the second additional protocol to the Geneva Conventions, applies. Protocol II deals with the protection of victims of non-international armed conflicts. It offers extra safeguards for both civilians and combatants, such as the ban on attacking civilians and the restriction of particular weapons.
The Additional Protocols are regarded as a component of international law since they have been ratified by a significant number of governments. They are an essential part of international humanitarian law and play a significant role in enhancing and explaining the protections offered by the Geneva Conventions.
The protections offered by the Geneva Conventions are expanded and clarified by the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions, which are extremely important. They serve to lessen the impacts of war and guarantee that people are treated with dignity and respect, even in the most challenging of situations. They provide additional protections for victims of armed conflict, including civilians, prisoners of war, and injured troops.
Some of the key contributions of the Additional Protocols include:
Expansion of the definition of civilians:
The Additional Protocols expand the definition of civilians to include those not directly participating in hostilities and provide additional protections for this group.
Prohibition of indiscriminate attacks:
The Protocols prohibit indiscriminate attacks that cause excessive harm to civilians or civilian objects and require that military targets be distinguished from civilian objects.
Protection of the environment:
The Protocols prohibit attacks on the natural environment, which can have long-lasting consequences for civilians and the environment.
Clarification of the rules on the use of weapons:
The Protocols provide additional clarity on the rules governing the use of weapons, including the prohibition of certain weapons and the requirement that weapons be used in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians.
Expansion of the protection of prisoners of war:
The Protocols expand the protections afforded to prisoners of war and provide additional protections for individuals who are captured or detained during an armed conflict.
The Geneva Conventions' provisions are made more thorough, effective, and applicable in today's armed conflicts in significant part due to the Additional Protocols. They support respect for people's rights and dignity throughout the armed conflict and improve the system of international humanitarian law.
In accordance with the Geneva Conventions and the International Court of Justice (ICJ), major transgressions of international humanitarian law that take place during armed conflicts are referred to as war crimes.
Under the Geneva Conventions, war crimes include, but are not limited to, the following acts:
Because they go against the fundamental tenets of international humanitarian law, which aims to safeguard civilians, prisoners of war, and other protected individuals during armed conflict and lessen the negative effects of war, these actions are regarded as war crimes.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal court of the United Nations. It has jurisdiction over international disputes and renders advisory opinions on legal issues that have been brought to it by the Security Council, General Assembly, or other UN bodies. The ICJ has the authority to consider cases involving war crimes claims in disputes between nations and to issue decisions that are legally enforceable.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has also been crucial in defining and interpreting the principles of international humanitarian law. The ICJ has broadened and defined the definition of war crimes via its jurisprudence, and it has confirmed that nations have a duty to look into and prosecute those who commit such crimes.
In conclusion, the definition of war crimes set forth by the Geneva Conventions and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) demonstrates the international community's commitment to upholding respect for international humanitarian law and to protecting civilians during armed conflict.
The important case of Ratko Mladic and Goran Hadzic
Here are some key facts about the trials of Ratko Mladic and Goran Hadzic:
Conclusion
The Geneva Conventions are a significant component of international law that protects people who are involved in armed conflict. Even though there have been many examples of these principles being broken, it is crucial for governments to take proactive steps to make sure the Conventions are kept and respected.
This can be accomplished by looking into and prosecuting war crimes as well as by educating and preparing military and security personnel. By upholding the Geneva Conventions, we can contribute to reducing the harm that armed conflict causes to civilians and other non-combatants and guarantee that people are treated humanely and with dignity, even in the most trying situations. Written By: Shivam Sharma, 5th Year , BA.LLB (10th Sem)
The agreements also designated a number of actions as war crimes, such as intentional injury to civilians, the maltreatment of prisoners of war, and the employment of weapons that inflict needless suffering. These laws safeguard society's most defenseless citizens and hold people responsible for their conduct during armed conflict.196 nations have ratified the Geneva Conventions, which continue to constitute a cornerstone of international humanitarian law.
Brief Introduction To Geneva Conventions And War Crimes
The Geneva Conventions are a group of international treaties that guarantee legal protection for war victims and forbidding particular types of conduct during warfare.The Geneva Conventions characterize war crimes as serious violations of the Conventions, including violations of some fundamental values, such the purposeful infliction of pain or humiliation onto an individual or group. killing prisoners of war, torturing people, mistreating civilians, and other cruel or inhumane acts committed against people during a war are examples of war crimes.
According to international humanitarian law, war crimes are major violations of the rules and traditions of war. They can lead to personal criminal liability and are among the most serious crimes according to international law. The main sources of international humanitarian law are the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols, as well as customary international law.
Examples of war crimes include:
Attacks on civilians or civilian objects:
Deliberate attacks on civilians or civilian objects, such as homes, schools, and hospitals, are considered war crimes.
Torture and inhumane treatment:
The intentional infliction of severe physical or mental suffering on prisoners of war, civilians, or other protected persons is a war crime.
Taking hostages:
Taking and holding hostages is considered a war crime, as it violates the principles of humanity and the protection of civilians.
Using prohibited weapons:
The use of chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons is prohibited and considered a war crime under international law.
Forced displacement:
Forcing civilians to leave their homes or territories is considered a war crime and violates their right to freedom of movement.
Sexual violence:
Rape, sexual slavery, and other forms of sexual violence are considered war crimes and violate the principles of humanity.
Enforced disappearances:
The kidnapping and detention of individuals without due process, followed by their disappearance, is considered a war crime.
International Tribunals Established
To prosecute people for war crimes and bring the guilty to justice, international criminal courts have been formed, such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). The prosecution of individuals for war crimes and other heinous crimes in accordance with international law is also provided for under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC).The United Nations (UN) Security Council created the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) as an ad hoc international criminal tribunal in 1993 to try war crimes committed during the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s.
Between 1991 and 2001, genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes were all crimes that fell within the purview of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Ethnic cleansing, mass murder, sexual assault, and other acts of violence against civilians are some of the most heinous crimes that the ICTY has prosecuted.
The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), which was established after the Nuremberg Trials after World War II, played a significant role in establishing international criminal justice as a means of holding people accountable for grave breaches of international humanitarian law.
The ICTY prosecuted 161 people throughout its existence, including senior military and political figures, and delivered a number of historic judgments. The work of the ICTY has aided in the evolution of international criminal law and helped to clarify what constitutes a war crime.
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTY) and the ICTY closed their doors in 2017 after completing their mandates, and their respective tasks were passed to the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals, which was formed to carry on their work (ICTR).
In conclusion, the ICTY was essential in ensuring that those responsible for the worst atrocities committed during the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia were brought to justice and in establishing international criminal justice as a means of fostering adherence to international humanitarian law and safeguarding victim rights.
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) was an international court formed by the UN in November 1994 to try those accountable for the 1994 Rwandan Genocide and other significant transgressions of international humanitarian law.
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) had its headquarters in Arusha, Tanzania, and ran until its mandate expired on December 31, 2015, at which point it was replaced by the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals. The ICTR was the first international criminal tribunal established to deal with genocide, and it has helped shape international criminal law via its activities.
The treaty that created the International Criminal Court (ICC), a permanent international tribunal to try people for the most serious international crimes, including genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes, is known as the Rome Statute. It was approved by 123 states as of 2021 after being adopted on July 17, 1998, in Rome, Italy.
Crimes committed by individuals on the soil of or by citizens of nations that have accepted the Rome Statute 11 fall under the purview of the ICC. In addition to national criminal jurisdictions, the ICC only serves as a prosecutor when national courts are unable or unwilling to do so. The ICC aims to hold individuals accountable for the most severe crimes and contribute to the prevention of such crimes in the future.
International conventions that define the requirements of humanitarian law to be followed in armed conflict are the 1949 Geneva Conventions and its Additional Protocols. They outline the duty of the parties to the conflict to uphold these protections and offer protections for those not participating in the hostilities, such as civilians, ill and injured soldiers, and prisoners of war.
Murder, torture, and cruel treatment of people who are protected by the Geneva Conventions are just a few examples of the significant transgressions that constitute war crimes. The legal foundation that establishes the bounds of appropriate conduct during armed conflicts is the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, and infringement of these articles are punishable as war crimes. Other international and national criminal institutions, notably the International Criminal Court, have the authority to bring cases against people for war crimes, including those committed during armed conflicts.
Briefly stated, the Geneva Conventions set forth the laws of war and safeguard people during armed conflicts, and violations of these laws are regarded as war crimes.
The four international treaties known as the Geneva Conventions were established in 1949 and offer protection to those who have been injured or killed in armed conflict. The treaties, which have been accepted by practically all nations in the world, are regarded as the foundation of contemporary international humanitarian law.
Four Geneva Conventions
The four Geneva Conventions are:The Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field: This convention covers the protection of sick and wounded soldiers on the battlefield, including the establishment of medical units and the protection of medical personnel.
The Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea: This convention covers the protection of sick, wounded, and shipwrecked military personnel at sea.
The Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War:
This convention covers the treatment of prisoners of war, including the protection of their lives, dignity, and humane treatment, as well as their rights to correspondence, food, and medical care.
The Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War:
This convention covers the protection of civilians in times of war, including the protection of their lives, dignity, and humane treatment, as well as their rights to food, medical care, and protection from violence.
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), a free-standing humanitarian organization, was also created by the Geneva Conventions to oversee their application and enforcement. The ICRC is in charge of encouraging adherence to the treaties and aiding armed conflict victims.
Modern international humanitarian law is based on the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, which also offer crucial safeguards for armed conflict victims like civilians, prisoners of war, and injured troops. These safeguards are intended to lessen the effects of conflict and to guarantee that people are treated with respect and dignity under any circumstances.
The four international treaties known as the Geneva Conventions were established in 1949 and offer protection to those who have been injured or killed in armed conflict. The Geneva Conventions' expanded and clarified provisions are outlined in two additional treaties known as the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions, which were signed in 1977.
The First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions (Protocol I), which is applicable when two or more governments are engaged in armed conflict, addresses the protection of victims of international armed conflicts. In addition to the ban on indiscriminate strikes and attacks on civilian targets, it offers extra protection for people.
When a state engages in armed conflict with non-state armed organizations, Protocol II, the second additional protocol to the Geneva Conventions, applies. Protocol II deals with the protection of victims of non-international armed conflicts. It offers extra safeguards for both civilians and combatants, such as the ban on attacking civilians and the restriction of particular weapons.
The Additional Protocols are regarded as a component of international law since they have been ratified by a significant number of governments. They are an essential part of international humanitarian law and play a significant role in enhancing and explaining the protections offered by the Geneva Conventions.
The protections offered by the Geneva Conventions are expanded and clarified by the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions, which are extremely important. They serve to lessen the impacts of war and guarantee that people are treated with dignity and respect, even in the most challenging of situations. They provide additional protections for victims of armed conflict, including civilians, prisoners of war, and injured troops.
Some of the key contributions of the Additional Protocols include:
Expansion of the definition of civilians:
The Additional Protocols expand the definition of civilians to include those not directly participating in hostilities and provide additional protections for this group.
Prohibition of indiscriminate attacks:
The Protocols prohibit indiscriminate attacks that cause excessive harm to civilians or civilian objects and require that military targets be distinguished from civilian objects.
Protection of the environment:
The Protocols prohibit attacks on the natural environment, which can have long-lasting consequences for civilians and the environment.
Clarification of the rules on the use of weapons:
The Protocols provide additional clarity on the rules governing the use of weapons, including the prohibition of certain weapons and the requirement that weapons be used in a manner that minimizes harm to civilians.
Expansion of the protection of prisoners of war:
The Protocols expand the protections afforded to prisoners of war and provide additional protections for individuals who are captured or detained during an armed conflict.
The Geneva Conventions' provisions are made more thorough, effective, and applicable in today's armed conflicts in significant part due to the Additional Protocols. They support respect for people's rights and dignity throughout the armed conflict and improve the system of international humanitarian law.
In accordance with the Geneva Conventions and the International Court of Justice (ICJ), major transgressions of international humanitarian law that take place during armed conflicts are referred to as war crimes.
Under the Geneva Conventions, war crimes include, but are not limited to, the following acts:
- Intentionally targeting civilians or civilian objects
- Taking hostages
- Using protected persons (such as prisoners of war or civilians) as human shields
- Intentionally causing widespread, long-term, and severe damage to the natural environment
- Torture, inhumane treatment, or enslavement of protected persons
- Intentionally killing or causing serious injury to a wounded or surrendered combatant
Because they go against the fundamental tenets of international humanitarian law, which aims to safeguard civilians, prisoners of war, and other protected individuals during armed conflict and lessen the negative effects of war, these actions are regarded as war crimes.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal court of the United Nations. It has jurisdiction over international disputes and renders advisory opinions on legal issues that have been brought to it by the Security Council, General Assembly, or other UN bodies. The ICJ has the authority to consider cases involving war crimes claims in disputes between nations and to issue decisions that are legally enforceable.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has also been crucial in defining and interpreting the principles of international humanitarian law. The ICJ has broadened and defined the definition of war crimes via its jurisprudence, and it has confirmed that nations have a duty to look into and prosecute those who commit such crimes.
In conclusion, the definition of war crimes set forth by the Geneva Conventions and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) demonstrates the international community's commitment to upholding respect for international humanitarian law and to protecting civilians during armed conflict.
The important case of Ratko Mladic and Goran Hadzic
Here are some key facts about the trials of Ratko Mladic and Goran Hadzic:
- Individuals:
Ratko Mladic was a former general in the Bosnian Serb army, while Goran Hadzic was a former political leader of the Croatian Serbs.
- Charges:
Both Mladic and Hadzic were charged with war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed during the conflicts in the Balkans in the 1990s.
- Prosecution:
The trials took place at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), which was established by the United Nations to prosecute war crimes committed during the Balkan conflicts.
- Conviction:
Ratko Mladic was found guilty on November 22, 2017, and Goran Hadzic was found guilty on April 15, 2016.
- Sentences:
Both Mladic and Hadzic were sentenced to life in prison for their crimes.
- Significance:
The trials of Ratko Mladic and Goran Hadzic were significant in terms of holding individuals accountable for the crimes committed during the conflict in the Balkans, and helped to provide a measure of justice for the victims and their families.
- Aftermath:
The ICTY completed its mandate in December 2017 and was closed, but the legacy of its work continues to shape the international criminal justice system and serves as a reminder of the need for accountability for serious international crimes.
Conclusion
The Geneva Conventions are a significant component of international law that protects people who are involved in armed conflict. Even though there have been many examples of these principles being broken, it is crucial for governments to take proactive steps to make sure the Conventions are kept and respected.
This can be accomplished by looking into and prosecuting war crimes as well as by educating and preparing military and security personnel. By upholding the Geneva Conventions, we can contribute to reducing the harm that armed conflict causes to civilians and other non-combatants and guarantee that people are treated humanely and with dignity, even in the most trying situations. Written By: Shivam Sharma, 5th Year , BA.LLB (10th Sem)
Also Read:
Law Article in India
Lawyers in India - Search By City
LawArticles
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...
Increased Age For Girls Marriage
It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...
Facade of Social Media
One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...
Section 482 CrPc - Quashing Of FIR: Guid...
The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India: A...
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is a concept that proposes the unification of personal laws across...
Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Legal...
Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors of the economy, and the legal i...
Please Drop Your Comments