News Release Fitzgerald Knaier Llp Secures Trial Victory In Long-Running
Pat & Oscar's Litigation
The hon'ble Judge Kevin Enright of the San Diego Superior Court yesterday issued
a final Statement of Decision in the case of Pat & Oscar's Concepts, Inc. v.
Casual Food Group, et al., a lawsuit brought by the owner of the Pat & Oscar's
restaurant brand against a group of former Pat & Oscar's franchisees, who
converted their restaurants to O's American Kitchen following the bankruptcy of
Pat & Oscar's. Although the plaintiff sought nearly $23 million in damages
against the former franchisees, the court declined to award any actual damages
to the plaintiff, and instead awarded a total of $100 in nominal damages.
The decision is a significant victory for the defendants, the owners of O's
American Kitchen restaurants, represented by Fitzgerald Knaier LLP. Â After a
trial lasting over a month, the jury refused to find the defendants liable, and
awarded no damages to either side on any of the claims or counterclaims. Â The
jury deadlocked on the plaintiff's claim for breach of contract, and the parties
chose to have Judge Enright decide this remaining claim, rather than going
through a second trial. Â In his final decision, the judge rejected the
plaintiff's contention that it had suffered nearly $23 million in lost profits,
and he ruled in favor of the O's American Kitchen owners on the plaintiff's
claim that they violated California's Unfair Competition Law.
A representative of the O's American Kitchen owners stated: "We are very pleased
with the result, which ends years of litigation over our right to sell
breadsticks, lemon and barbecue chicken, ribs, and other popular menu offerings.
 Following the bankruptcy of Pat & Oscar's and the loss of our franchises, we
worked very hard to improve our recipes, change our décor, add new menu items,
and forge a new identity as O's American Kitchen. Â With the judge's decision, we
are again able to focus on providing high quality hand-crafted menu items in a
fast-casual format."
Pat & Oscar's was originally founded as "Oscar's"Â in San Diego, by Pat & Oscar
Sarkisian and their children John Sarkisian and Tammy Moore. Â Known for its
popular breadsticks, the restaurant chain was sold by the Sarkisians to Sizzler
in 2000, for roughly $22 million. Â Shortly after the sale, the chain was renamed
from "Oscar's"Â to "Pat & Oscar's," due to another restaurant's ownership of the
trademark "Oscar's."Â Â The chain then suffered an E. coli outbreak, followed by a
failed expansion and franchising effort by Sizzler and subsequent owners. Â In
2011, the chain went into Chapter 7 bankruptcy, and the Sarkisian family
repurchased the brand from the company's largest creditor for $370,000. Â The
Sarkisians also took over the lone non-franchised Pat & Oscar's restaurant still
operating, on Sarkisian-owned land in Temecula. Â After the existing Pat &
Oscar's franchise owners failed to come to terms with the Sarkisians over how to
revitalize the brand, the franchisees converted their restaurants to become O's
American Kitchens. Â The Sarkisian family then sued the franchisees, contending
that they breached their Pat & Oscar's franchise agreements by continuing to use
the Pat & Oscar's recipes and restaurant system, along with a similar looking
logo. Â In the trial, the Sarkisian family claimed lost profits damages of
$22,958,757. Â After the jury rejected most of the claims, the judge in the case
awarded a total of $100, and declined the Sarkisians' request to enjoin the
defendants from using their current name, logo, recipes, and restaurant system.
Lead attorney for Defendants, Ken Fitzgerald, stated: "This was a hard fought
case in which the Plaintiff was represented by very skilled trial lawyers. Â The
Sarkisians were claiming that assets they had paid $370,000 to acquire out of
bankruptcy were essentially worth about $23 million, and they supported that
claim with the opinion of a well-credentialed damages expert witness. Â We are
grateful that the court rejected this claim, and we are pleased that our clients
are now free from the burden of this overreaching litigation effort.
About the Kosnar Group
Carl Kosnar provided franchise litigation support in this case, appeared at
pre-trial depositions, and testified as a franchise expert witness during the
trial.
Â
The Kosnar Group litigation support team has provided attorneys and their
clients with franchise expert witness and litigation support services for years,
with some of our professionals having over 35 years of franchise experience. Our
opinions are valued by attorneys, clients, and triers of fact because we are
professionals who work exclusively in the franchise industry. We communicate and
present our positions in a fashion that attorneys, clients, judges, and juries,
can understand.
Lawyers in Los Angeles
How To File For Mutual Divorce In Delhi Mutual Consent Divorce is the Simplest Way to Obtain a D...
It is hoped that the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, which intends to inc...
One may very easily get absorbed in the lives of others as one scrolls through a Facebook news ...
The Inherent power under Section 482 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (37th Chapter of t...
Comments