This study investigates the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on constitutional morality, focusing on how AI promotes constitutional advancement while adhering to democratic values such as justice, equality, and transparency. The term "invisible human" represents AI's indirect role in reshaping constitutional frameworks by operating as an ethical and technological mediator without overt human involvement. This research critically evaluates AI's transformative potential in legal and constitutional processes.

The integration of AI in constitutional systems introduces challenges concerning ethical accountability, transparency, and the preservation of human-centric legal values. Addressing these concerns is essential to align AI's capabilities with foundational constitutional principles. How does AI influence the concept of constitutional morality?

What frameworks ensure ethical AI integration in constitutional processes? How does the "invisible human" impact legislative and judicial decision-making? The research aims to examine the role of AI in upholding constitutional morality and proposes strategies for its ethical incorporation into legal systems. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study combines qualitative analysis of constitutional principles, quantitative assessment of AI's impact, and comparative analysis of global practices. The research identifies areas where AI aligns with or challenges constitutional morality, develops an ethical integration framework, and offers recommendations for policy reforms. AI's role in constitutional processes is dual-edged—enhancing efficiency but risking biases and accountability gaps. Ethical safeguards are crucial for its responsible use.

AI democratizes access to justice, improves legal precision, and ensures transparency. However, unregulated use could erode public trust. This study emphasizes balancing AI innovation with constitutional ethics to benefit society while safeguarding democratic values.

This paper considers the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) on constitutional morality as it related to its promotion of constitutional advancement while simultaneously operating within democratic values such as justice, equality and transparency. The notion of the "invisible human" describes AI playing a secondary part in reconstructing the constitution, acting as an ethical and technological intermediary without an overt human presence.

This research seeks to investigate the transformative potential of AI vis-à-vis legal and constitutional processes. The proliferation of AI in the setting of constitutional systems raises issues of ethical accountability, transparency, and adherence to human-centered legal values. It is necessary to articulate these issues fully in order to align the capabilities of AI with basic constitutional principles. To what extent can we envisage AI, which would ideally offer the application of constitutional morality?

How do ethical AI frameworks incorporate the constitutional process? How does the "invisible human" play in the construction of legislative/judicial take-up? This study looks at how AI affects constitutional morality and suggests ways to bring it into legal systems. The research uses a mix of methods, including a close look at constitutional ideas, number-crunching on AI's effects, and comparing what different countries do. It finds where AI fits with or goes against constitutional morality, creates a plan for ethical use, and suggests policy changes. AI has two sides in constitutional matters—it makes things faster but might be biased or hard to hold accountable.

We need ethical rules to use it. AI helps more people get justice, makes laws clearer, and keeps things open. But if we don't control it, people might lose faith in the system. This work stresses the need to balance new AI tech with constitutional ethics to help society while protecting what makes democracy work.

Introduction
The concept of constitutional morality is crucial to ensuring a democratic society that operates under the rule of law, where values like equality, justice, liberty, and fairness are guaranteed through a structured legal framework. Constitutional morality transcends the mere interpretation of the written word of the constitution. It is about how those in positions of power — particularly judges, lawmakers, and government officials — apply these principles in real-world situations. Constitutional morality is a living idea, constantly evolving with the changing societal, political, and economic conditions of a country.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being seen as a disruptive force across various sectors, including governance, healthcare, education, and even law. The use of AI in governance has opened new avenues for enhancing efficiency, fairness, and transparency. AI's capacity to analyze vast datasets and make decisions based on established algorithms offers the potential to minimize human bias, error, and subjectivity in legal interpretations, ensuring that constitutional principles are upheld more uniformly.

This paper explores the intersection between constitutional morality and AI, with a focus on how AI can act as an Invisible Human in constitutional decision-making processes. The concept of the Invisible Human refers to the potential for AI to operate in the background, free from emotional biases, political influences, and human imperfections. The role of AI in reinforcing constitutional morality offers both exciting possibilities and serious ethical concerns, particularly regarding human rights, the accountability of AI systems, and transparency in decision-making.

This research aims to evaluate whether AI can be an effective tool in advancing constitutional morality and what the broader implications might be for governance and society. By examining the use of AI in constitutional decision-making, the paper seeks to provide insight into how AI can support or undermine democratic values, human rights, and the rule of law.

Research Methodology

The research methodology for this study is designed to analyze both the theoretical and practical implications of integrating AI into constitutional law. The methodology will be qualitative, focusing on theoretical discussions and case studies. The aim is to understand how AI can influence the application of constitutional principles, the challenges it presents, and its ethical implications.

• Literature Review: A critical review of existing literature on constitutional morality, the use of AI in governance, and the legal implications of AI will form the foundational basis of this research. This includes reviewing books, academic papers, case law, and policy documents that discuss the role of AI in law, particularly its impact on constitutional principles.
   
• Case Studies: Case studies will be explored, particularly those involving AI in legal systems or public governance. These could include AI-driven decision-making in judicial processes, the use of AI in legislative bodies, and AI applications in administrative functions that relate to constitutional matters.
   
• Interviews and Expert Opinions: Interviews with constitutional law experts, AI specialists, and ethicists will provide real-world insights into the practical aspects of implementing AI in constitutional systems. These experts can offer informed opinions on AI's role in safeguarding or potentially undermining constitutional values.
   
• Comparative Analysis: A comparison between jurisdictions that have begun using AI in governance and those that have not will be conducted. The aim is to assess the practical effects of AI implementation in constitutional frameworks, particularly focusing on countries that have used AI in judicial systems, public administration, and policymaking.

Hypothesis
This research is based on the following key hypotheses:

• Primary Hypothesis: Artificial Intelligence, when ethically designed and deployed, can significantly enhance the application of constitutional morality. It has the potential to support democratic values by promoting fairer, more transparent, and consistent decision-making, particularly in the legal and governance systems. AI's data-driven approach can reduce human error, bias, and inconsistencies, ensuring that constitutional principles such as equality, justice, and liberty are more consistently upheld.
   
• Secondary Hypothesis: The Invisible Human metaphor suggests that AI, by functioning as a neutral entity, could operate in the background, free from human biases, political influences, and emotional judgments. In doing so, it could make decisions that are aligned with constitutional values without human intervention, increasing the impartiality and objectivity of the legal system.

Research Questions

To guide the study and narrow down the scope of inquiry, the following research questions are posed:

• How can AI enhance constitutional morality in the application of law and governance? This question will explore the specific ways in which AI can contribute to ensuring that constitutional values are upheld in legal decision-making. The focus will be on AI's potential to support judicial independence, reduce biases in decision-making, and promote fairness.
• What ethical and philosophical considerations arise when integrating AI into constitutional law? This question addresses the potential ethical dilemmas surrounding AI's involvement in governance. Key issues include AI transparency, algorithmic bias, the rights of individuals, and the accountability of AI systems in decision-making processes.
• In what ways can AI be used to safeguard individual rights and freedoms under a constitution? The paper will investigate AI's role in ensuring the protection of rights and freedoms, particularly in cases of legal disputes. Can AI be trusted to act as an impartial arbiter in safeguarding constitutional rights, such as the right to equality and freedom of speech?
• What are the challenges and risks associated with AI in constitutional governance? This question delves into the risks of relying on AI for constitutional decision-making, such as the risk of deepening social inequality, exacerbating algorithmic bias, and diminishing human discretion in legal decisions.

Research Components

This research is divided into the following key components:

• Constitutional Morality: A deeper analysis of constitutional morality will be undertaken to explore how constitutional values shape legal systems and guide governance. The research will explore how these values are not only legal norms but also serve as the moral compass of democratic systems. The study will examine key case laws and judgments that have highlighted constitutional morality, focusing on landmark decisions that have impacted human rights, equality, and justice.
• Artificial Intelligence in Governance: This component will discuss AI's growing influence on governance. AI systems have been integrated into various public administrative functions and legal frameworks in some countries, providing insights into how AI is reshaping constitutional governance. The study will explore AI's potential to enhance government transparency, improve efficiency, and automate decision-making processes, while also addressing the risks of over-reliance on AI systems in sensitive constitutional matters.
• Ethics and Accountability in AI: Ethical considerations in AI systems are central to this research. The ethical dilemmas surrounding AI's role in legal systems — including concerns over privacy, algorithmic bias, and transparency — will be explored. Case studies will be presented to illustrate the challenges of implementing AI in constitutional governance, with a focus on ensuring fairness and human rights protection.
• Human vs. AI Decision-Making: This component examines how human decision-making differs from AI decision-making. The analysis will focus on AI's ability to eliminate human subjectivity and bias, making decisions based on data-driven algorithms. Comparisons will be made between AI-driven judicial decisions and traditional human-led decisions, discussing the benefits and drawbacks of AI in legal contexts.
  

Effect on Society

The effect of AI on society is one of the most critical aspects of this research. AI has the potential to significantly influence several areas of society, including:

• Impact on Justice: AI can improve the justice system by making legal decisions more transparent and objective. Its ability to analyze vast amounts of data and consider diverse viewpoints can enhance decision-making while reducing the potential for biases. This can lead to more equitable legal outcomes.
• Impact on Equality: AI systems can be used to detect biases in legal decision-making, ensuring that all individuals are treated fairly under the law. The integration of AI into judicial systems may help reduce racial, gender, and socio-economic biases that have historically plagued the legal system.
• Political and Social Impact: AI's influence extends to broader political and social structures. If AI is integrated into governance systems, it could lead to more equitable policymaking. However, there are also concerns about AI exacerbating inequalities if not properly regulated.
• Public Perception: The public's perception of AI in constitutional law is crucial for its acceptance. If the public trusts AI systems to operate transparently and fairly, AI could become a valuable tool for enhancing constitutional morality. Conversely, if AI is seen as a threat to individual rights or democracy, its integration may face resistance.

Conclusion
In conclusion, AI has the potential to play a significant role in reinforcing constitutional morality by ensuring that democratic values are upheld more consistently and transparently. While there are several ethical concerns and challenges associated with integrating AI into constitutional governance, its benefits in promoting fairness, transparency, and accountability cannot be overlooked. However, careful attention must be paid to the design, deployment, and regulation of AI systems to ensure that they serve the interests of justice and human rights.

Future research should focus on further empirical studies, case law analyses, and policy development to fully understand the complex relationship between AI and constitutional morality. In the end, AI's role as an Invisible Human in constitutional decision-making could provide a path towards a more just, equitable, and transparent society.

References:

• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Susskind, R. (2019). Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford University Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
• Glenn, H. P. (2004). Legal Traditions of the World. Oxford University Press.
• Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.
• Balkin, J. M. (2017). The Three Laws of Robotics in the Age of Big Data. Harvard Law Review.
• Zarsky, T. Z. (2016). The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law.
• Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press.
• Surden, H. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Law: An Overview. Georgia State University Law Review.
• Cane, P. (2017). Controlling Administrative Power. Cambridge University Press.
• Sourdin, T. (2018). The Digitisation of Dispute Resolution: (Re)defining the Judge. International Journal of Law and Information Technology.
• Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big Data's Disparate Impact. California Law Review.
• Mittelstadt, B. D., et al. (2016). The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data & Society.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford University Press.
• Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2019). A Right to Reasonable Inferences: Re-Thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data. Columbia Business Law Review.
• Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Floridi, L., et al. (2018). AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society. Minds and Machines.
• Rahwan, I. (2018). Society-in-the-Loop: Programming the Algorithmic Social Contract. Ethics and Information Technology.
• Vinuesa, R., et al. (2020). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications.
• Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI Ethics. MIT Press.

Written by: Tanmoy Basu, passed B.A.L.L.B from University of Calcutta & pursuing L.L.M from Rajiv Gandhi University (RGU) - Arunachal Pradesh.
E-mail: basutanmoy.1998@gmail.com