Unnatural Death: Unravelling the Mysteries Beyond Natural Causes  

Defining Unnatural Death – A Legal and Medical Perspective

The term “unnatural death” holds distinct yet complementary definitions from both legal and medical standpoints, crucial for investigation, public health, and justice.

1. Legal Definition (as per Section 194 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023):

   Section 194 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, provides a comprehensive legal framework for what constitutes an “unnatural death,” mandating official inquiry into a broad spectrum of circumstances. These typically include:

   • Suicide: Deaths resulting from an individual’s deliberate act to end their own life.
   • Homicide: Deaths caused by the intentional or unlawful act of another person.
   • Animal-Related Fatalities: Deaths directly attributable to attacks or incidents involving animals.
   • Machinery-Related Deaths: Fatalities occurring due to industrial, mechanical, or other machinery-related accidents.
   • Accidental Deaths: Deaths arising from unforeseen and unintentional events.
   • Suspicious Circumstances: Deaths where the conditions or preliminary findings raise a reasonable suspicion of foul play, a criminal offense, or undue influence by another party.

2. Medical Definition:

   From a medical perspective, unnatural deaths are fundamentally those that are not attributable to natural causes such as disease, illness, or the natural aging process. Forensic medicine plays an indispensable role in examining these incidents to establish the definitive cause and manner of death. This rigorous process enables the precise classification of unnatural deaths as:

   • Suicidal: Self-inflicted.
   • Homicidal: Caused by another.
   • Accidental: Unintentional.
   • Undetermined: When definitive evidence is absent to firmly categorize the manner of death.

This meticulous medical and forensic classification is paramount, not only for guiding legal proceedings and ensuring justice but also for the accurate compilation of public health data, which informs policy and prevention strategies.

The Legal Framework – BNSS and BNS:

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, are the primary laws governing the investigation of unnatural deaths in India.

1. Section 194 of BNSS, 2023:

   This section empowers the police to investigate and report on unnatural deaths. When informed of an unnatural demise, the officer in charge of a police station or a specially authorized police officer must promptly inform the nearest Executive Magistrate. This notification triggers the “inquest” process, which aims to determine the apparent cause of death, identify any injuries, and ascertain how they were inflicted.

   The police conduct an initial inquiry, often with the presence of esteemed community members, and prepare a report outlining the condition of the deceased and the circumstances of the death.

2. Section 196 of BNSS, 2023:

   This section grants magistrates the authority to investigate the circumstances surrounding a death. A magisterial inquiry is required in specific situations, including:

   • Deaths occurring while in police custody.
   • Suicides committed by women within seven years of their marriage.
   • Deaths of women within seven years of marriage under suspicious conditions.
   • Instances where the cause of death is uncertain or a police officer deems an inquiry necessary.

   Magistrates possess the power to mandate post-mortem examinations and to officially record evidence under oath.

3. Death in Judicial Custody:

   Deaths occurring within judicial custody — encompassing jails, prisons, correctional homes, and government-sponsored homes — are a critical indicator of unnatural death. These incidents signal significant human rights violations and systemic deficiencies, given the state’s inherent and elevated responsibility for the safety and well-being of individuals under its charge.

   Such fatalities, stemming from alleged suicide, illness, violence by inmates or staff, or medical neglect, necessitate a judicial inquiry under Section 196 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (which superseded Section 176(1A) of the CrPC).

   The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) strongly advocates for this judicial examination to ensure investigations are both independent and transparent. Nevertheless, practical challenges frequently impede the discovery of truth, including delayed post-mortem examinations, incomplete videography, and evidence tampering.

   Through pivotal judgments like People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (2005), the Supreme Court has consistently reinforced the obligation for stringent accountability and compensation in custodial death cases, highlighting their violation of Article 21’s constitutional right to life and their detrimental impact on public faith in the justice administration.

4. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023:

   The investigation’s findings will determine which provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) are applicable:

   • Sections 100 and 101 (Culpable Homicide and Murder): These sections are invoked when an individual intentionally causes the death of another. The crucial differentiator between culpable homicide not amounting to murder and murder often hinges on the precise intent or knowledge possessed by the perpetrator at the time of the act.
   • Section 106 (Causing death by negligence): This provision comes into play when a death results from a rash or negligent act that falls short of culpable homicide.
   • Section 80 (Dowry Death): This specific section addresses the tragic deaths of women within seven years of their marriage. It applies when such deaths, caused by burns or bodily injury, or occurring under unnatural circumstances, are linked to cruelty or harassment by the husband or his relatives in connection with a dowry demand made shortly before the death.
   • Section 108 (Abetment of Suicide): This section criminalizes any act that instigates or intentionally aids another person in committing suicide.

Medical Aspects – The Role of Forensic Medicine

Forensic medicine, particularly forensic pathology, is indispensable in unnatural death investigations. The primary tool employed is the post-mortem examination (autopsy), conducted by a forensic pathologist or a trained medical officer. An autopsy aims to:

• Determine the cause of death: The specific injury, disease, or combination of factors that led to death.
• Ascertain the manner of death: This classifies the death as natural, accidental, suicidal, homicidal, or undetermined. While the police/magistrate conduct the inquest, the medical expert plays a critical role in providing the scientific basis for determining the manner of death.
• Estimate the time of death: Crucial for corroborating witness statements and establishing a timeline of events.
• Identify the deceased: Especially important in cases where the body is unidentifiable.
• Collect forensic evidence: Biological samples (blood, tissue, hair, DNA), trace evidence, and toxicology samples for analysis.
• Document injuries: Detailed description of wounds, fractures, bruises, and their characteristics (e.g., type of weapon used, force applied, direction of injury).

In India, post-mortems are typically conducted in government hospitals with forensic departments. While generally preferred during daylight hours, there is no legal prohibition against conducting them at night in urgent cases, provided necessary permissions are obtained. Importantly, in cases of unnatural or suspicious deaths, family consent is not required for a post-mortem; it is a legal requirement as part of the investigation.

Case Laws and Legal Precedents

State of Rajasthan v. Thakur Singh (2014)

This case highlighted the principle that if a person dies an unnatural death in a room occupied by the accused, and the cause of death is known to the accused, then it is a strong circumstance pointing to their guilt—especially if they fail to explain the grounds for the unnatural death. This judgment underscores the importance of Section 109 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which places the burden of proving facts especially within the knowledge of the accused.

Hem Chand v. State of Haryana (1994)

This landmark case, involving a dowry death, saw the Supreme Court meticulously examine the circumstances of the unnatural death of a woman within seven years of marriage. The Court linked it to demands for dowry and cruelty, upholding convictions under Sections 304B (Section 80 BNS) and 498A (Section 85 BNS) of the IPC, thereby solidifying the legal framework for dowry-related fatalities.

Inhuman Conditions In 1382 Prisons, In Re (2017)

While not directly a criminal conviction case, this landmark public interest litigation by the Supreme Court profoundly addressed the issue of unnatural deaths in prisons and other custodial settings. The court emphasized the dire need for:

• Proper classification of natural and unnatural deaths
• Further sub-categorization of “other” unnatural deaths
• Ensuring accountability, preventing human rights violations, and upholding the dignity of individuals in state custody

Gurdeep Singh v. State of Punjab (2011)

This case underscored the need for concrete and proximate evidence in dowry death cases, particularly regarding the nexus between dowry demand and the unnatural death. The court highlighted that a mere demand for money days before an unnatural death may not automatically lead to conviction under Section 304B IPC (now Section 80 BNS), if the ingredients are not conclusively spelled out—reinforcing the requirement for proof of cruelty “soon before death.”

Satbir Singh & Anr. v. State of Haryana (2021)

The Supreme Court clarified the interpretation of “soon before death” under Section 304B IPC (Section 80 BNS) and Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act (Section 118 BSA). It emphasized:

• The phrase should not be interpreted as “immediately before”
• It implies a proximate and live link between the cruelty or harassment and the death
• A consistent pattern of cruelty or harassment related to dowry—even if not immediately preceding the death—can invoke the presumption if the link is established

Shabeen Ahmad v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (2025)

In this significant recent judgment (Criminal Appeal No. 1051 of 2025, decided March 3, 2025), the Supreme Court emphasized the need for stricter judicial scrutiny in matters pertaining to dowry deaths, especially when a young woman dies in suspicious circumstances in her matrimonial home soon after marriage. The Court:

• Cautioned against a “superficial application of bail parameters”
• Highlighted that granting bail mechanically undermines the gravity of the offense
• Stressed the societal impact and judiciary’s role in sending a strong message against such crimes

Conclusion: These judgments collectively emphasize the need for:

• Meticulous investigation
• Proper evidence collection
• Establishment of a strong nexus between the circumstances and the alleged offense
• A sensitive judicial approach in unnatural death cases, especially those involving vulnerable victims or custodial environments

They reflect the evolving jurisprudence aimed at ensuring justice and preventing such incidents.

Challenges and Future Directions

While India possesses a strong legal framework and recognizes the crucial contribution of forensic science to unnatural death investigations, significant challenges remain. Addressing these obstacles is essential to improving the accuracy and efficacy of the process.

1. Existing Challenges

   • Infrastructure and Resources: A persistent and geographically uneven distribution of resources hinders optimal investigation. This includes a critical deficit of qualified forensic pathologists, especially in rural regions, leading to delays and potentially compromised examinations. Compounding the issue is the inadequacy of mortuaries, which often lack essential equipment for proper storage, preservation, and detailed examination of bodies. Furthermore, access to advanced forensic laboratories equipped with state-of-the-art technology remains limited, impeding the use of sophisticated analytical techniques vital for complex cases.
   • Thousands of unnatural death cases remain pending for disposal or closure in the police stations. This backlog is primarily due to the non-submission of final opinions by autopsy surgeons, which in turn stems from the delayed receipt of Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) reports. The underlying issues contributing to this delay are poor infrastructure, inadequate number of forensic science laboratories, and a significant shortage of qualified forensic experts in FSL facilities across the country.
   • Coordination: Effective collaboration among the various stakeholders is paramount in conducting thorough and impartial investigations. However, the current system often faces hurdles in ensuring seamless coordination between the police, who initiate the investigation; magistrates, who provide oversight and legal authorization; and medical/forensic experts, who determine the cause and manner of death. Inter-agency disconnects often result in delays, miscommunication, and can even jeopardize the investigation’s integrity.
   • Training and Sensitization: The complexities inherent in unnatural death investigations demand continuous professional development for all involved personnel. There is an ongoing need for comprehensive training programs and sensitization initiatives specifically tailored for investigating officers, judicial officers, forensic specialists, and medical professionals. These programs should focus on equipping them with the latest knowledge, techniques, and best practices for handling such cases, including recognizing subtle signs of foul play and accurately interpreting forensic evidence. Furthermore, fostering a culture of empathy and sensitivity towards the deceased and their families is critical.

2. Future Directions – Towards a Medical Examiner System

   India’s current system for investigating unnatural deaths is inadequate. Adopting a Western-style medical examiner system, with centralized authority for trained forensic pathologists, is crucial. This would replace the current police-magistrate inquest with an independent, scientific process, reducing backlogs, improving FSL reports, and enhancing justice in unnatural death cases.

Literature Review

Unnatural death, defined by external factors such as accidents, homicides, suicides, or instances of medical negligence, has consistently been a primary concern within forensic medicine, legal scholarship, and public health dialogues. This category stands in contrast to natural death, which arises from inherent physiological mechanisms like disease or aging. The comprehensive examination of unnatural deaths necessitates the convergence of multiple fields, spanning forensic pathology, criminology, and legal jurisprudence, with each discipline contributing to the elucidation of the circumstances surrounding such fatalities.

1. Defining Unnatural Death: Legal and Forensic Perspectives

   The World Health Organization (WHO) defines unnatural deaths as those not attributable to disease or internal bodily malfunctions (WHO, 2022). Within the medico-legal frameworks of numerous jurisdictions, these deaths are typically classified as accidental, suicidal, homicidal, or of undetermined cause (DiMaio & DiMaio, 2021). In the Indian legal system, Section 194 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, mandates a police and magistrate inquiry for any death that is suspicious or unnatural.

   The concept of unnatural death is deeply embedded in both legal and forensic traditions. Forensic specialists, such as Knight and Saukko (2020), underscore the critical importance of accurately classifying the manner of death for effective criminal investigations and robust public health monitoring.

   The distinction between natural and unnatural death frequently becomes indistinct due to undetected medical conditions, deliberate concealment, or the influence of cultural practices. – (Knight & Saukko, 2020)

2. Epidemiology and Trends in Unnatural Deaths

   Contemporary research indicates a global rise in the incidence of suicides and road traffic accidents, with a notable prevalence in low- and middle-income nations (Patel et al., 2019). For instance, India recorded in excess of 150,000 accidental deaths and over 160,000 suicides in 2022, with significant contributing factors including mental health challenges, substance abuse, and domestic violence (NCRB, 2023).

   Data originating from Western countries suggest that drug overdoses and firearm-related fatalities constitute major contributors to unnatural mortality (Rossen et al., 2020). The COVID-19 pandemic further complicated these trends, leading to an increase in deaths related to domestic violence and suicides, often exacerbated by social isolation and economic pressures (Gunnell et al., 2020).

3. Investigative Challenges and Forensic Pathology

   Ascertaining the manner and cause of death demands meticulous forensic analysis, including autopsies, toxicological examinations, and histopathological studies. However, differentiating between homicide and suicide, particularly in cases involving hanging, poisoning, or drowning, presents persistent challenges (Byard, 2019). Inaccurate documentation, compromised crime scenes, or delayed postmortem examinations can impede the ability to reach definitive conclusions.

   While technological advancements such as virtual autopsy (virtopsy), postmortem imaging (CT and MRI), and DNA profiling have substantially enhanced the precision of forensic findings (Rutty et al., 2017), many developing regions face limitations in forensic infrastructure and the availability of trained personnel, thereby impacting the timely resolution of unnatural death cases.

4. Sociocultural and Gendered Dimensions

   Unnatural deaths are not merely medical or legal phenomena but are intricately linked to socio-cultural contexts. For example, occurrences such as bride burning or dowry deaths in South Asia represent a form of gender-based violence often misrepresented as suicide or accidents (Kapadia et al., 2021). Honor killings, custodial deaths, and hate crimes further illuminate societal divisions that manifest in fatal outcomes.

   Women and children are disproportionately susceptible to underreported or misclassified unnatural deaths, frequently owing to stigma or systemic neglect. Social taboos surrounding suicide and deaths related to sexual violence also contribute to misreporting or the concealment of facts (Chowdhury & Khan, 2020).

5. Legal Reforms and Judicial Oversight

   The judiciary plays an indispensable role in the investigation and adjudication of unnatural deaths. Landmark cases, such as Pavitra v. State of Karnataka and PUCL v. Union of India, have underscored the necessity of independent autopsies in cases of custodial deaths and alleged encounters. Human rights commissions globally advocate for transparency and accountability in such matters (NHRC, 2021).

   Recent legal reforms emphasize the significance of digital recording of postmortems, mandatory videography, and the rights of immediate family members during the inquest process (Law Commission of India, 2022). Nevertheless, the implementation of these reforms remains inconsistent.

6. Psychological Autopsy and Interdisciplinary Collaboration

   In situations where physical evidence is insufficient, psychological autopsy — an investigative technique that reconstructs the deceased’s mental state — has gained prominence, particularly in suicide investigations (Cavanagh et al., 2021). This method utilizes interviews, personal writings, medical histories, and behavioural analysis, and has demonstrated utility in assisting judicial clarity.

   The value of interdisciplinary collaboration among forensic experts, mental health professionals, law enforcement agencies, and sociologists is increasingly recognized as crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted nature of unnatural deaths (Arboleda-Flórez & Sartorius, 2020).

Conclusion:
Investigating unnatural deaths, a task fraught with legal, social, and medical complexities, necessitates a resilient and adaptable approach, underpinned in India by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) of 2023. The efficacy of this legal framework hinges on meticulous medical examinations, where the expertise of forensic pathologists is paramount, alongside unwavering adherence to legal procedures to ensure investigation integrity.

To meet the evolving challenges posed by societal and technological advancements, refining investigative methods, embracing advanced forensic techniques, and investing in modern infrastructure are crucial for achieving accurate findings and advancing justice. Ultimately, the examination of unnatural deaths represents a critical intersection of medical science, legal principles, and societal considerations, demanding rigorous scientific inquiry, legal fairness, and compassionate understanding to inform reform, raise awareness, and prevent future tragedies.

References:

1. Arboleda-Flórez, J., & Sartorius, N. (2020). Violence and Mental Disorders: A Comprehensive Approach to Unnatural Deaths. Springer.
2. Byard, R. W. (2019). Forensic Pathology Reviews: Vol. 7. Humana Press.
3. Cavanagh, J. T., Carson, A. J., Sharpe, M., & Lawrie, S. M. (2021). Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 51(7), 1116–1127.
4. Chowdhury, A. N., & Khan, M. Z. R. (2020). Stigma of suicide and unnatural death: A barrier to mental health reform. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 62(6), 620–626.
5. DiMaio, V. J. M., & DiMaio, D. (2021). Forensic Pathology (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
6. Gunnell, D., Appleby, L., Arensman, E., et al. (2020). Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(6), 468–471.
7. Kapadia, A., Roy, S., & Sharma, R. (2021). Dowry deaths: Examining the blurred lines between murder and suicide. Gender & Society, 35(3), 345–367.
8. Knight, B., & Saukko, P. (2020). Knight’s Forensic Pathology (4th ed.). CRC Press.
9. Law Commission of India. (2022). Report on Medico-Legal Reforms in India. Government of India.
10. (2023). Accidental Deaths & Suicides in India 2022. National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs. URL: https://ncrb.gov.in
11. (2021). Guidelines on Custodial Deaths and Human Rights Oversight. National Human Rights Commission, India. URL: https://nhrc.nic.in
12. Patel, V., Ramasundarahettige, C., Vijayakumar, L., et al. (2019). Suicide mortality in India: A nationally representative survey. The Lancet, 393(10193), 1397–1405.
13. Rossen, L. M., Hedegaard, H., & Warner, M. (2020). Trends in death rates in the U.S. due to drug overdose and suicide. JAMA, 323(24), 2450–2451.
14. Rutty, G. N., Morgan, B., Robinson, C., et al. (2017). Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem CT with targeted coronary angiography versus conventional autopsy. The Lancet, 390(10090), 145–154.
15. (2022). International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11): Unnatural Causes of Death. World Health Organization. URL: https://icd.who.int