Under the Constitution Separation of powers between the Union (Centre) and its Constituents (that is the States) have been explicitly dealt with in Seventh Schedule whereby the subjects on which the Union and the State can legislate have been segregated. Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule (which deals with state subjects) read with Article 246(3), the Constitution has empowered the State to make laws with respect to taxes on the sale or purchase of goods other than newspapers subject to the provision of Entry 92A of List I (dealing with Union subjects) whereby the same is not allowed by the State if it involves inter-State trade or commerce. Thus, taxes on sale of goods other than newspapers etc can be levied by the State Governments only.
However, in The State of Madras v. Gannon Dunkerley & Co. the phrase sale of goods became the subject of scrutiny. The expression as defined in Section 4(1) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 was given a narrow interpretation as it included only those sales whereby:
1. An agreement was to transfer title,
2. It was supported by consideration and ,
3. An actual transfer of title took place.
To undo this rigor, Clause 29A was added to Article 366 which mentions of six particular transactions which have been included to increase the scope of expression sale of goods.
One of those transactions reads as follows:
(d) a tax on the transfer of the right to use any goods for any purpose (whether or not for a specified period) for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration.
The contention that Article 366(29A)(d) involves a sale of goods when a lottery ticket is sold was raised in the case of H.Anraj v, Government of Tamil Nadu (1985).The two Judge Bench while deciding the case held that the lottery ticket involved two kinds of rights viz:
1. Right to participate in lottery draw and
2. Right to win the prize depending on chance (that is a contingent interest in money).
The second right while was a ?chose in action? and hence not goods, the first was a transfer of beneficial interest in moveable goods and hence was liable to be taxed. Therefore, sales tax could be levied on sale of lottery tickets by the State.
However, this decision was challenged in the case of Sunrise Associates v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and others (1999), where it was contended that the Right to purchase a lottery ticket was nothing more than an actionable claim within the meaning of Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and therefore outside the definition of goods under Sales Tax Acts.
On April 28, 2006 while delivering the judgment settling the issue Justice Ruma Pal and others held that:
1. The distinction drawn in the above mentioned H. Anraj's case was undesirable and
2. That lottery tickets were ?actionable claim? and hence not susceptible to Sale Tax by State.
Hence, in the light of the above discussion it can be stated that the action of Sales Tax authorities against the proceeds from sale of lottery tickets is untenable in law.
Advance Ruling Under Vat Acts
D.E.P.B., Its Taxability - Issues Therein
Renting of Immovable Property - Service Tax
Leviability of Sales Tax to Actionable Claim
Export of Services- An analysis
Regulatory Aspects of Venture Capital In India
Deductions Under Section 80d & 80e Of The Income Tax Act
Vodafone vs. Union of India
Anti-Dumping Regime in Indian Scenario
Assessment of Income From House Property
The Bhopal Gas Tragedy: On Whether and How the Indian Companies Act, 1956 can be used to make a case for imposing social responsibility on corporations?
The Irony of Taxing the Environment to Protect It - A UK Perspective
Tax privileges for import of energy-saving equipment into Ukraine
Custom Valuation & Transfer Pricing
The Double Tax Avoidance Agreement between India and Mauritius
Carry Forward and Set off of Losses
Tax chages in Nepal by Finance Act 2067
Feasibility of GAAR for removing the practice of Tax Avoidance
Interpretation of taxing statute as strict construction and exemption
Comparables and Transfer Pricing
General Anti Avoidance Rule GAAR - An Indian and International Perspective
Tax Implications on Business Reorganization Schemes
Fearlessness of the Judiciary
Non Resident Indian under Income Tax Act, 1961
Why Tax Practitioners Bill Required For India
Silent Features of GST Bill 2016
Goods and Service Tax (GST) Working In India
SEZ Eligibility under SEIS Scheme
NRIs, PIO and OCI to Share Tax Info Under FATCA/CRS Agreement
Delegation of Taxation Power
Applicability and Exemption under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
269ST of the Income Tax Act 1961
BEPS: Master File and CbCR: Step Towards Making World One Tax Jurisdiction
The author can be reached at: firstname.lastname@example.org / Print This Article
How To Submit Your Article:
Follow the Procedure Below To Submit Your Articles
Submit your Article by using our online form
Note* we only accept Original Articles, we will not accept Articles Already Published in other websites.
For Further Details Contact: email@example.com
Articles of YesteryearsClick on the link Below to check articles submitted in previous years:
Latest Articles - Law Articles 2017 - Law Articles 2016 - Law Articles 2015 - Law Articles 2014 - Law Articles 2013 - Law Articles 2012 - Law Articles 2011 - Law Articles 2010 - Law Articles 2009 - Law Articles 2008 - Articles 2007 - Law Articles 2006 - Law Articles 2000-05 - Archive
File Your Copyright - Right Now!
Online Copyright Registration in India
Call us at: 9891244487 / or email at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Lawyers in India - Search By City