|Legal Service India - Special Economic Zone - Myth and Reality - Indian Economy - What is a SEZ?|
|Legal Advice | Find a lawyer | Constitutional law | Judgments | forms | PIL | family law | Cyber Law | Law Forum | Income-Tax | Consumer laws | ROC laws|
|Latest Articles | Articles 2013 | Articles 2012 | Articles 2011 | Articles 2010 | Articles 2009 | Articles 2008 | Articles 2007 | Articles 2006 | Articles 2000-05|
What is a SEZ?Special economic zone or SEZ refers to a totally commercial area specially established for the promotion foreign trade. A Special Economic Zone (SEZ) is a geographical region that has economic laws more liberal than a country's typical economic laws. Usually the goal is flourishment in foreign investment. In other words SEZs are specifically delineated enclaves treated as foreign territory for the purpose of industrial, service and trade operations, with relaxation in customs duties and a more liberal regime in respect of other levies, foreign investments and other transactions. These regions exists in many countries of the world and China perhaps the oldest to give reality to this concept. Although they exist in several countries, their attributes vary. Typically they are regions designated for economic development oriented toward inward FDI and exports fostered by special policy incentives. The SEZs in India are the outcome of the present government’s industrial policy which emphasizes deregulation of Indian industry and to allow the industries to flexibly respond to the market forces. All undertakings other than the small scale industrial undertakings engaged in the manufacture of items reserved for manufacture in the small scale sector are required to obtain an industrial license and undertake an export obligation of 50% of the annual production. This condition of licensing is, however, not applicable to those undertakings operating under 100% Export Oriented Undertakings Scheme, the Export Processing Zone (EPZ) or the Special Economic Zone Schemes (SEZs).
Basic Difference between EPZs and SEZsThe SEZs are the new nomenclature of modified earlier Export Promotion Zones or EPZs. The first EPZ in India was set up in 1965 Kandala. They were created as privileged zones with the facilities of liberal tax and labour laws. They were to attract the foreign investors to import materials for use and export the manufactured commodities. In this way jobs would be created and export got enhanced. The main difference between an EPZ and a SEZ is that the former is just an industrial enclave but the latter is an integrated township with fully developed infrastructure.
Background of SEZ India.During late 1990s the then Union Commerce Minister Murasoli Maran visited the high tech SEZs in China and got impressed by their contribution to the rapid growth of GDP of the country. He then thought about taking measures to do the same in India. However by that time India was already introduced with the first export processing zone in Kandala. But the main difference that it was not SEZ but EPZ. India was not deemed to be very happy with the EPZs because they were falling short due to various reasons. As a result the expectation rose high and the SEZs were conceived to be far efficient, calculated and modernized than the EPZs. In the light of the experiences drawn from international level it is evident these centers have added tremendously in the growth of employment and foreign direct investment or FDI. Their role has been evaluated as very significant in the growth of the economy of the host country. In New Delhi the International Convention on Special Economic Zone was arranged on March 21, 2002. The main guest was undoubtedly Mr. Maran, the Honorable Minister for Commerce and Industry on that time. In his speech he pointed out that for a long period of time foreign trade in India has been viewed as suspicion rather an optimum potential to charge a high growth rate of the economy. The time has come when the country is moving towards export fatalism to export apathy. This change of notion would definitely lead to an incentive to the economic progress of the country and for this the need of SEZ is inevitable. The SEZs would act as vehicles of production and the FDI increase swiftly. As a result India will attain a considerable place in its contribution to the world economy.
Dream becomes Policy and Policy becomes Law.
The government of India announced SEZ policy in March 2000 under the export-import policy for the augmentation of export production. At that time Mr. Murasoli Maran was the union minister for Commerce and Industries. However he could not fetch his plans far as the existing government was defeated in the general election of 2004. But this defeat perhaps did not create any disappointment in the minds of Mr. Maran because the new government took sufficient measures to give the SEZ policy a form of binding law. We all know that a policy may not be enforced but a law can be. The new government came out with Special Economic Zones Act in the year 2005 which attained the assent of the president on 23rd June. This Act provided for the establishment, development and management of the Special Economic Zones for the promotion of exports and for the matters connected therewith.
Some Important Provisions of the Act
1. SEZs can be established mainly for manufacturing of the goods, for providing specified circumstances and as a free trade and warehousing zone.
2. SEZs will include three types mainly. They are multi-product SEZ, sector specific SEZ, port or airport based SEZ and free trade and warehousing zone.
3. They will have their own adjudicating, enforcing and administering agencies. Therefore absolute non interference by the state.
4. There will be 100% tax exemption and relaxation from strict labour laws.
5. They will not have any burden to comply with any sort of minimum obligation to export.
6. Except for certain kind of offences the no investigation or inspection can be carried out in any of the SEZs without prior approval from the development commissioner.
7. The Development Commissioner will be entrusted to the overall administration and supervision of the SEZ and exercise all necessary controls and co operations to foster speedy and effective development of the SEZ concerned. The development commissioner shall be appointed by the central government.
How will be the Special Economic Zones?The main underlying purpose behind the creation of SEZs is to create a hassle-free environment for the promotion of exports. These zones are regarded as duty free enclaves and for the purpose of trade operations they are deemed to be foreign territories. The SEZ policy offers various fiscal and regulatory incentives to the developers within the zone along the incentives available with central SEZ policy. They are to emerge as zones of excellence. The basic presumption behind SEZs is that they will bring large scale investment of global funds into the manufacturing and service sectors and pump the economy to its top. As a result the infrastructure conceived is world class. There will be easily available marketing initiatives and from them Indian industry is expected to gain benefit. The setting up of the SEZs will allure investment from within India and abroad. This will also lead to the development of the concerned area, ensuring better quality of goods and services, large scale employment and many other elements highly expected to boom the already growing market economy of India. According to the government if all these are totaled then it will lead a total forwarding of Indian economy.
To develop SEZs there has to be someone who needs to improve the basic infrastructure. Upon that infrastructure the superstructure of SEZs will function. The infrastructure will play one of the key roles behind the success of each and every SEZ. For example if production is huge and ready to reach the port but due to bad transportation goods can not be reached there n time then order is cancelled. It implies no fault in the superstructure but in the infrastructure. If such thing takes place then the manufacturer will soon loose the motivation and the success will be at stake. Therefore by our common sense we can understand the importance of infrastructure.
The government is also in the same footing of common sense with that of an ordinary prudent person and after a cautious observation of the main objectives of the SEZ policy it has came to this opinion that there shall be no lack of efforts in the infrastructural development of the SEZs. As a result the role of developer has been conceived with due care and attention.
Developer means a company that develops the infrastructure and other facilities on land earmarked as SEZs. The incentives under this policy given to the developers are:
# Items imported for setting up, operation and maintenance of SEZs will be exempted from customs duty.
# Exemption from excise duty for the goods required for abovementioned purposes.
# Income tax exemption for a period of 10 years in the first 15 years operation.
# Exemption from central sales tax for the goods used for development and maintenance of SEZs.
# Exemption from service tax with reference to the services required in connection to the development and maintenance of the SEZs.
# Drawbacks and any other benefits are admissible from time to time.
Apart from the developers it also preserves certain incentives for the enterprises also. Let’s have a look on them.
# 100% income tax exemption for a considerable period of time.
# 100% FDI permitted to the manufacturing sectors except for some specified.
# External maturity borrowings through recognized banks with any hard regulation.
# Requirements of no import license.
# Exemption from licensing regulations for the items reserved under SSI sector.
# No routine examinations by Customs for export and import cargo.
# Exemption from Central Sales Tax and Service Tax.
# Exemption from customs duties, Central Excise duties and the like.
The term ‘exemption’ is very commonly used here. But there has been no proper justification in order to boom up the economy whether the loss of public revenue is an inevitable requirement or not.
To attain the goals management is a very important factor in any business entity. This concept is also applicable with respect to SEZs. The public sector units in India in their long term of functioning received the stigma that interpose by the govt. in the management of the business units proved to be an utter failure because it is alleged to be inefficient and not compatible with the changing situations of corporate world. As a result govt. has lost interest in running business units and privatization has been preferred. This is also true with regard to the coming SEZs. According to section 11 of SEZ Act there will be a development commissioner appointed by the central govt. and that person will be the overall in charge of the zones. He is also entitled to exercise all the necessary administrative powers to ensure proper functioning of the SEZ concerned.
Why the Present Unrest?
The above discussion clicks in our mind that the govt. has deliberated the SEZ policy with all due care in order to enhance the economic growth of India. Since policy can be changed with the change of government therefore to give it a binding nature, government has enacted SEZ Act for enforce the development envisioned by it. In a broader aspect SEZs will create employment, quality goods and services and India will be able to bag a good position in the international economic scenario. Therefore for the sake of argument it can be presumed that SEZ policy is a welfare policy and all shackles to be removed from its way of calculated success. But people from various parts of our country are vehemently protesting against the coming up of SEZs. The question is ‘why’? Let’s take a drive to address this question by taking into account the various concerns related inevitably to SEZs.
Land Acquisition:Industry can not be framed in air. It needs land and by virtue of being seventh in the world as far as territory is concerned India still has ample quantity of land. However the quantity of land is neither adequate to support the growing need for shelters to bulk of the people nor it is of very high productivity to meet the growing demand for additional food grains. Irrespective of this fact we call India to be self sufficient in the food grains but the productivity of Indian farmlands as compared in hectors with the other countries like china is very less. Land is required for agriculture, land is required for shelter and land is required for the economic development of the country. It is the right of the farmer to grow crops in his land, it is the right of all human beings to seek lands for shelter and it is the right of the government to foster economic growth of the country in order to sustain the same in the international competition and to make a good image of it in the family of nations. But if a question comes as to which amongst the three rights is most competent then all will be the unanimous answer. But as state is vested with a huge amount of resources it has got the power to decide which right is given foremost importance in the given circumstances. The decision of the state may not be matching with that of the individuals.
Our present discussion does not take into account the right to have shelter because the lands being pointed out for the development of SEZs are non-agricultural or so called semi-agricultural or barren lands. Therefore the present conflict is between right to livelihood and right to economic development. The government has employed total of its force and justification to sustain the latter. The ministry of commerce and industry has discussed that the SEZs will be coming only on barren lands and single crop lands. But in practice it has not been so. The policy of SEZ has already acquired the stigma of land grabbing policy or a new model of real estates business by giant developers and the like. People have already expressed their negative views over SEZs saying destroying valuable agricultural plots seems especially ill-conceived, as farmers are not likely to make an easy transition to the jobs on offer at these SEZs. For getting industrial development sacrifice of agricultural land is non-permissible. The history shows that most of the land acquired by the Government at minimum rates have been commercialized and sold at market rate by manipulations. It is a scandal and will end up in a mess. Already more than 10 farmers are committing suicides every day.
The growing issue of SEZ also leads to the growth of resistance from the rural people. Govt. and the developers are claiming that the resistance is unreasonable. Since the meaning of ‘reasonableness’ has not been defined anywhere therefore a live example may workout. In some area in the outskirts of Mumbai the farmers have been handed over land acquisition notices by the authority and the developers. The local officials’ claim that the land earmarked is unproductive but by a drive through the villages one can really eyewitness as to how unproductive is the lands. Further there is a difference of opinion amongst the officials also. According to an official from Maharashtra the policy clearly talks about non acquisition of irrigated and double-cropping land. But this is also true that some organization named Posco-India has acquired multiple cropping lands in Orissa. The officials from the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board have said that under the given guidelines 10% of the required can be double-cropped. The Baikampady SEZ has been disputed as a result of the statement made by the Union Minister for Commerce and Industry saying that 10% of the lands can be double cropped.
Environmental Issue:Whenever we talk about industries, environment comes very usually as one of the important concerns. Industry uses natural resources at a huge scale. Proper utilization of natural resources is expected at all levels but simultaneously over utilization, reckless operation etc. adversely affects the ecological balance. Therefore to protect the environment from the whims and fancies of the selfish industrialists it has become necessary to frame and implement rigid laws in order to prevent any kind of harm to environment and also to undertake a subsequent survey to find out the necessary implications left out on the environment by the industry. SEZs also therefore should not be exempted from the environment regulations. In other words environment can not be sacrificed on the excuse of economic development of the country. There should be no compromise in this regard.
However the SEZ units are exempted from Environmental Impact Analysis under the provision of the Environment (Protection) Act. Further, the development commissioner will be empowered to issue consent and no objection letters in consultation with the officers of the state pollution control board. The units, which are classified as non-polluting industries, do not require a consent letter. The development commissioner can give clearance without consulting the pollution control board. The units are permitted to submit a compliance report for maintaining prescribed pollution standards. Although the development commissioner has powers for a random check, the units within the SEZ are free to follow their own methods to maintain environmental standards. It has also been expected that the conflict between development and environment needs to be resolved properly and the environmental regulations must be proactive in nature and not to be barrier on the path of country’s economic development. If the nature of the environmental norms remains prohibitive in nature then it will be difficult for the private entrepreneurs to participate in the issues concerning environment. Thus it can very easily be inferred that SEZ developers as well as the entrepreneurs are in the want of more and more relaxation in the environmental norms which the govt. is in the way of granting.
Issue of Labor Welfare: Apart from the issues deliberated above, there are other aspects also which are required to be taken into consideration. The issue of labor is very important. The parliament since the time of independence has enacted a number of legislations concerning welfare of the labors. The main object behind this was to promote the interests of the labor class and to protect them from the exploitation of the industrialists. But a reading of the SEZ Act leaves us under the apprehension that it hardly gives any space for the welfare of the labors. A member of the Rajya Sabha raised a very pertinent doubt regarding this. He said there is an ILO recommendation about the Grievance Redressal Authority and the Development Commissioner. The ILO recommendation is that these two persons should be different persons, but here, the Development Commissioner has been given the authority to look after the task of grievance redressal. This should not be done. It is further apprehended that all the rights concerned the labor class have been tactfully withdrawn by both the central as well as the state govt. The rights of the labor class have been attacked in this Act under Section 49(1) which categorically says Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply to any modifications of any Central Act or any rules or regulations made there under or any notification or order issued or direction given or scheme made there under so far as such modification, rule, regulation, notification, order or direction or scheme relates to the matters relating to trade unions, industrial and labour disputes, welfare of labour including conditions of work, provident funds, employers’ liability, workmen’s compensation, invalidity and old age pension and maternity benefits applicable in any Special Economic Zones. Similarly, the right of the State Government for granting exemption from the labour rights has also been deleted. The original draft was The State Governments may, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of this Act, notify policies for Developers and Units and take suitable steps for enactment of any law:- …….. (b) directing that any of the provisions of any State Act relating to Trade Unions, industrial and labour disputes, welfare of labour including conditions of work, provident funds, employers’ liability, workmen’s compensation, invalidity and old age pensions and maternity benefits or any other activity relating to the Special Economic Zones-(i) shall not apply to a Special Economic Zone or a class of Special Economic Zones or all Special Economic Zones; or (ii) shall apply to a Special Economic Zone or a class of Special Economic Zones or all Special Economic Zones only with such exception, modifications and adaptations, as may be specified in the notification;. Existence of bold portion would also invite competition among the states in withdrawing the rights and facilities of the workers. So the entire bold portion has been withdrawn from the Bill before its adoption. Section 3 (4) of the draft gave right to set up and notify a Special Economic Zone without referring the proposal to the State Government. That also has been amended. It is also alleged that SEZs are centers of immense exploitation. The zones are declared to be public utility services and that in effect bans trade unionism and application of labor laws. Minimum wages are not implemented; employees are forced to work overtime without any extra payment; safety equipments are not provided adequately; crèches are not provided; instances of sexual harassment are very common.
Legal Recourse to Oppose SEZ.To counter the mechanism of SEZ people have not only started protesting vehemently but have also knocked the doors of the judiciary to strike down the policy as well as the Act. Several writ petitions and public interest litigations have been filed in various High Courts as well as the in the Supreme Court of India. An advocate Manohar Lal Sharma filed a PIL in the Supreme Court seeking a CBI probe into the alleged land scandal. He contended that vast track of fertile lands have been acquired illegally in Delhi, Kolkata and Mumbai. He has also submitted graphic details and alleged that there is an unholy nexus between the industrialists and the politicians. He also brought in to the notice of the Court that in those places police has used its force to humiliate and assault the people in order to receive the possession of the lands concerned. He prayed before the Court to grant interim stay and to direct the lands to be given back to the real owners. In another instance the petitioner contended that in some places the lands were acquired without the consent of the farmers. The Acts under challenge are Centre's Special Economic Zones Act 2005, National Capital Region Planning Board Act 1985 and Haryana's SEZ, 2005. The petitioner has particularly prayed for nullifying the colourable exercise of power which is both malafide in law and malafide in fact in respect of Reliance which has been given about 1700 acres of land for Garhi Harsaru SEZ site in Haryana. In response to that petition the Supreme Court issued notice to the centre, states concerned and the developer to examine the conflict arisen. In another writ petition the petitioner sought to quash the MOU signed between govt. of Punjab and Reliance Industries limited for setting up of SEZ on the alleged ground of blatant violation of land allotment policy. In another writ petition the adequacy of the compensation given to the farmers was challenged before the Court. The Court granted liberty to the farmers to challenge the adequacy of the compensation provided. In Allahabad High Court a writ petition was filed to restrain the government from finalizing the setting up of a SEZ in Noida on the alleged ground that the lands were acquired at the pittance of the farmers and it is in violation of Article 14 and 300(a) of the Constitution. In another petition the entire SEZ policy of the govt. was challenged on the ground that it will create a huge financial loss and the economy may collapse. But the Court refused to entertain the petition on the ground that it was purely a policy matter but left a remark that the Court can interfere in the policy matter in the individual cases when the party concerned is personally affected.
Opinions given by experts find a very specific reference under the Indian Evidence Act 1872. The jurisprudence behind providing a clause for expert’s opinion is to substantiate the evidence submitted before the Court with the help of a person who has undertaken a through study or research in that particular subject matter which is being used as evidence. But the scope of using expert’s opinion is not only limited to the Court cases but in any other place where some views is expressed and the author tries to justify them. In the present article also there is ample opportunity to use opinion of the persons having sound political background as the matter of SEZ has already obtained political colour.
According to Mr.V.P.Singh, SEZs are models for the development of the country. These models should be inclusive as to every one has a share in the cause. But the present model is so designed that some people pay the price and suffer. If in a market economy the buyers and sellers have no choice to exercise then it is not market economy in its true form. In a democracy everyone dictates its term over the government but the farmers can not. It is injustice. Vast tacks of prime agricultural lands have been taken over by the govt. of UP and other states. If this goes on then activities of the landless laborers will come to an end. In this way the country will advance to a major socio economic crisis. The farmers have been given the price of Rs 150 per square yard in Dadri. The same land without any development has been valued at Rs 5,700 per square yard by Reliance and it is demanding a loan from the bank on the basis of this assessment. The thesis is that the rate at which the company has valued the land for the bank appraisal should be the real value of the land. If it is not, then the bank is being cheated. And if it is the real value, then the farmers are being cheated.
The first and second world wars taught a great lesson to the people of the world. After these two disasters democracy has been seen as a global entitlement. People started abhorring totalitarianism and dictatorship as those two have already proved their status. Presently democracy is the best alternative available. Since democracy is a government by the people, of the people and for the people therefore public opinion plays a crucial role. A true democracy is the rule by the majority and willingness of the minority to accept the rule. The role of minority is very important because it brings into the notice to the public about various flaws in the present government and suggests for the reform. If the present govt. does not acknowledge and address the flaws pointed out by the opposition then there is a reasonable apprehension that in the next election people will not give them a chance to rule. Therefore the majority can not blatantly deny the role of opposition. This has also been true with reference to our present Indian government as far as the SEZ policy is concerned. Keeping in view the growing opposition and grievance amongst the people the govt. had to give a fresh thought to the SEZ policy and some necessary amendments were brought in.
The measures taken are:
1. The policy of SEZ has already become a political football that worries the present govt. of inviting popular backlash. The controversy has already become a major election issue. Therefore the govt. decided not to grant permission for new SEZs until and unless the rehabilitation policy put into place properly. This is due to the political cost involved in the issue being measured too high to bear.
2. The new National Rehabilitation and Resettlement (NPR) 2006 policy suggests that first priority should be to provide land for land. People whose lands are acquired should get jobs in the new industries established on their land. The compensation package includes allotting a free house site to the affected family, allotting cultivable land and a rehabilitation grant equivalent to 750 days minimum agricultural wages, giving fishing rights where dams are made.
3. The govt. has further decided to make the final version of the policy (NPR) legally enforceable. This kind of policy will have no meaning unless it is enforceable in a court of law’’ said Raghuvansh Prasad Singh, Minister, Rural Development. This policy introduces the concept of Social Impact Assessment (SIA) along with the current norm of Environmental Impact Assessment. The SIA would also involve public hearings on displacement-related issues, loss of livelihood, compensation, effects on family. Sources said there is also a proposal to set up a statutory National Rehabilitation Commission to ensure independence of the monitoring mechanism.
4. New ceiling has been imposed on the size of SEZs. Minimum processing area has been raised from 35% to 50%. This new norm has already upset some of the developers of multi-product SEZs which had to cut down certain plans chocked out earlier.
5. Speaking at a FICCI meeting, the PM said issues such as land acquisition and displacement of people and their rehabilitation and resettlement should be transparently addressed. Urging the Indian industry to be sensitive to the need to empower the weaker sections of society, Mr. Singh said industrial development is not a zero-sum game. According to the PM the policy of SEZ is irreversible but since it is exposed to certain problems which can not be dismissed. It is the strength of our democracy. A mechanism is to be set up to address those gaps in the policy. There will be a comprehensive review of Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) with reference to the pending approvals. He said I do believe that we should address these concerns if we want the policy to succeed in the long run.
6. The other developments include i) Area of an SEZ capped at 5000 hectares; states can fix lower ceiling, ii) state govts are barred from acquiring land, developers will have to do it of their own, iii) at least one job per family of those displaced, iv) developers to devote at least 50% area for core activities like manufacturing v) list of non-processing activities may be reviewed.
7. One more step has been taken to make special economic zones more acceptable to critics. State governments have decided not to give any tax exemption to non-processing areas in SEZs. As a result of this decision states levies on building material and fuel are now expected to be applicable with reference to non-processing activities in SEZs.
When the govt. undertakes a project or policy in a democratic country then the people have reasonable expectation to be benefited without any kind of detriment to any section of the society. SEZ policy is also not out of this test. After all the underlying philosophy behind is to generate more employment and advance to the cause of equitable development. To fulfill the above objective it is necessary to take the following safety measures into consideration.
Corporate Social Responsibility:Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a concept that suggests that commercial corporations have a duty of care to all of their stakeholders in all aspects of their business operations. CSR argues that enterprises should be obliged to make decisions based not only on financial/economic factors (e.g. Profits, Return on Investment, dividend payments etc.) but also on the social, environmental and other consequences of their activities. In the context of SEZs the concept of corporate social uprightness is very important. The main justification behind putting the SEZs in the scanner of CSR is ‘doctrine of enlightened self-interest’. According to this doctrine, the motive and interest for companies engaging in social responsibilities is to enhance their reputation and image both locally and internationally. Corporate social responsibility must be taken into consideration to respect environmental concerns; to not to deprive the indigenous people from their long time entitlements; to ensure social security measures to the people working and the like in those de-regulated zones.
Cost-Benefit Analysis: The concept of cost benefit analysis is very popular in Economics. Cost benefit analysis refers to analysis of the cost and benefits involved in a project undertaken. Here the terms ‘cost’ and ‘benefit’ are understood in context of the society and calculated in terms of money. If the social cost is less than or equal to the benefits derived then the project is undertaken. The concept of cost-benefit analysis is very pertinent with respect to the coming SEZs.
According to Mr. R. Venkatesan For the Government, profit alone cannot be the motive as it has an obligation to ensure that such projects do not adversely impact the people. To gauge the likely impact of a project on a State's economy, a Social-Cost Benefit Analysis (SCB Analysis) is often commissioned. Computation of social profits at the economic hurdle rate is a key step in assessing whether the project is in the national interest and for computing the kind of concessions that can be provided by the Central/State governments, such as tax concessions or waivers, or giving it SEZ (special Economic Zone) status. Such an approach allows the assessment of the impact of a project on the national economy, unlike financial analysis which has a narrow perspective — of profit accruing to the project, and to the stake-holders. The SEZs in India have got momentum from that of China. But we should remember that there are differences between the two models. The lacunae inherent must be addressed properly. The fiscal policy in promoting SEZs should be such that a zone generates more revenue than an industry would. The factors like employment and personal income tax must be considered thoroughly well. It should be ensured that proportion of employment in the SEZs is higher than that of the displacements caused due to setting up of the SEZs. Keeping in view the guidelines referred under section 5(1) of the Act vis-à-vis the amount of direct and indirect tax exemptions, the cost benefit analysis has to be worked out and a set parameter be fixed based on which performance of each SEZ has to be assessed. The enormous revenue loss of Rs. 97,000 crore reportedly estimated by the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, has to be counter balanced by earning for an objective assessment of the success of the SEZs as otherwise the common man have to bear the brunt of additional taxes.
Sustainable Development: The coming up of SEZs must be put under the scanner of sustainable development as it is being emphasized world wide that development be it social, economic or political must bear substantial value. While putting in the context of Indian SEZs three aspects of sustainable development must be taken into consideration. These three aspects are economy, environment and society. A summation of the three aspects tell us that SEZs must be so formulated that they can ensure production of goods and services in a continuous basis, avoidance of sectoral imbalances, restraint from over exploitation of natural resources, maintenance of biodiversity, atmospheric stability, achievement of distributional equity, adequate provision of social services and the like. If these aspects are taken care of with comprehensive and proper deliberation then SEZs can generate sustainable value. SEZs should be envisaged as a self-sustaining value creation proposition. In other words they should benefit the society in tremendous quantum.
Social Justice: The constitution of India embraces social justice in its preamble. The directive principles of state policy are embodied in the constitution to fulfill the noble objective of social justice. It is thus expected that whatever policy or measure being taken by the state must ensure advancement of the cause of social justice. The policy of SEZ is also comes under the same footing.
Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar, one of the main visionaries of the constitution of India, advocated democracy in every field: social, economic and political. For him social Justice means maximum happiness to the maximum number of people, upliftment of the poor, backward and downtrodden. The present trend to set up SEZs shows lands (sometimes even agricultural) are being taken up for establishing industry. This phenomenon resembles with the situation that emerged in Soviet Russia under the dictatorship of Stalin. In that regime state sponsored land-grab mechanism reached its peak. Millions of peasants were deported, the protests were suppressed in bloodily manner, and country sank into starvation. The object behind doing so was to accrue the increasing number of peasants to industry. The immediate effect was reduction of Soviet agriculture to a stage of decline from which it has not yet recovered. The destruction of the Soviet peasantry, who formed three quarters of the population, was not only an economic but a moral disaster for the entire country. As a result of this present motion of SEZs there comes a web of complex land laws restricting the freedom of enterprises to acquire land and the freedom of individuals to sell land in the name of a dubious cause called Social Justice. There is no Social Justice in the State playing facilitator to get around a web of laws that owed their existence in the first place to the State. The current approach to SEZ Land Acquisition with the State at its heart fails the tests of Social Justice. There is no Social Justice in the State playing an active role in Land Acquisition for private enterprises. Therefore it should be taken care of.
The development process in India presently exposed to two fold challenges. On the one hand, how do we make our agriculture more productive so that we maintain our food security? On the other hand, how do we increase the manufacturing base to absorb a large army of unemployed and underemployed labour in industry? India is an aspiring nation of young people, and unless these challenges are addressed with appropriate policies, the country is at serious risk of social and economic Balkanization. The protests being organized in the various parts of the country, the views being expressed continuously through the media clearly shows that there is something genuinely wrong. In such a circumstance it would be unfair to blindfold the eyes and drive the dream by bulldozing the expectation of millions of people. When a country comes up to be economically developed then one should not be under the impression that it is the industry which only contributes. If economy is conceived to be a hanging bridge then agriculture and industry are the two pillars of it. If one is sacrificed at the benefit of the other then it does not remain bridge at all. We should try to give equal importance to both of them rather than getting mad over any of them. Development should to gather at one pocket, let it spread throughout the country in all aspects, all factors. This is true development. A man gains belly because all the food gathers in a particular place, had it been spreading all over the body then he would look slim and feel comfortable. The train of development travels over the two tracks made simultaneously by agriculture and industry. If one track is absent then it is impossible to drive the train.
 Special Economic Zone; retrieved from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Economic_Zone, visited on 22.1.07.
 Industries & Commerce Department - Policy framework for Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in Andhra Pradesh Order Issued; retrieved from: http://sezindia.nic.in/andharapradesh.asp, visited on 22.1.07.
 Deardorff's Glossary of International Economics, Retrieved from: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~alandear/glossary/s.html#sez2, visited on 23.1.07.
 Industrial Policy, retrieved from: Economywatch.com. Visited on 22.1.07.
 Sangita Mulji, Special Economic Zones, From Lawyers Collective, Vol.21, No. 9, October 2006, p.8.
 Aradhana Aggarwal, Special Economic Zones: Revisiting the Policy Debate, retrieved from: http://188.8.131.52/search?q=cache:Ug0GyuGWq6MJ:www.epw.org.in/articles/2006/11/10702.pdf+Special+Economic+Zone+Sustainable+Development&hl=en&gl=in&ct=clnk&cd=2, visited on 25.1.07.
 The Financial Express, April 19, 2006, retrieved from http://www.ficci.com/news/viewnews1.asp?news_id=257, visited on 23.1.07.
 International Convention on Special Economic Zone, March 21 2002, New Delhi, Retrieved from: http://www.ficci.com/media-room/speeches-presentations/2002/Mar/march-sez-maran.htm, visited on 23.1.07.
 Ramachandra Bhatta, ‘Karnataka: SEZs and the Environment’, retrieved from: http://www.epw.org.in/showArticles.php?root=2003&leaf=05&filename=5819&filetype=html. , visited on 19.1.07.
 The Gazette of India, No. 31. The Special Economic Zones Act, Dated 23rd June, New Delhi.
 Retrieved from: http://www.navimumbaisez.com/overview.htm, visited on 18.1.07.
 Special Economic Zones: Boom or Bust, retrieved from: http://www.indiamap.com/comment/blog/index.htm, visited on 19.1.07
 N.K.Patel, SEZs-Reform to Reality-1, Times Property, The Times of India, Ahmedabad, Sunday, April 1, 2007.
 Special Economic Zones (SEZs), Ministry of External Affairs, India, retrieved from: http://meaindia.nic.in/indiapublication/Special%20Economic.htm, visited on 18.1.07.
 Special economic zone or land grab, retrieved from: http://psdblog.worldbank.org/psdblog/2006/10/special_economi.html, visited on 21.1.07.
 Dionne Bunsha ,‘Rural Resistance’, Frontline ,October 20. 2006.
 Ramachandra Bhatta, ‘Karnataka: SEZs and the Environment’, retrieved from: http://www.epw.org.in/showArticles.php?root=2003&leaf=05&filename=5819&filetype=html. , visited on 19.1.07.
 Labor Issues in Parliament on Special Economic Zones, Published in ‘Working Class’, September 2006, retrieved from: http://citu.org.in/wclass_sep06_a1.htm, visited on 28.1.07.
 Chittabrata Majumdar, THE SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES BILL 2005, Published in ‘Working Class’, June 2005, retrieved from: http://citu.org.in/wclass_June05_a3.htm, visited on 28.1.07.
 ALL INDIA CONVENTION OF EPZ/SPZ WORKERS, published in ‘Working Class’ on August 2002, retrieved from: http://citu.org.in/wclass_aug02_a6.htm, visited on 21.1.07.
 PIL filed in SC against land acquisition policy for SEZs, Retrieved from: http://www.indlawnews.com/B3C1BAA0982428AB9DA17F9BFEC9F979, published on 29th September, 2006, visited on 21.1.07.
 SC notice to Centre, states on SEZ petition, retrieved from: http://www.indlawnews.com/899b7fdd5a27d99ce1dd18e27309d2f7, published on 7 December, 2006, visited on 21.1.07.
 Writ petitions challenging Reliance SEZs, retrieved from: http://www.indlawnews.com/D2451A6689171C0AA8F1F04E1724D12B, published on 26th September, 2006, visited on 21.1.07.
 SC grants farmers liberty to challenge state on SEZs, retrieved from: http://www.indlawnews.com/42981bf3e911b0b5ccc2c37f0bb426e0, published on 13 November 2006, visited on 21.1.07.
 SEZ PIL Dismissed by Allahabad HC, retrieved from: http://www.indlawnews.com/d4aaf6703fd1a108cac8dbc2714db1e1, published on 14th September, 2006, visited on 21.1.07.
 SC refuses to entertain PIL challenging Govt. policy on SEZs, retrieved from: http://www.indlawnews.com/D2344276E39AB7144E2A1A7332303C35, published on, 6 November, 2006, visited on 21.01.07.
 See Chapter II (Relevancy of Facts) of Indian Evidence Act 1872, Sections 45 to 51.
 Sanjay Kapoor and Sandeep Yadav , ‘I want to become a Maoist…: V P Singh’, retrieved from: Retrieved from: http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14288569, visited on 2.02.07.
 Sanjay Kapoor and Sandeep Yadav, ‘I want to become a Maoist…: V P Singh’, retrieved from: Retrieved from: http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14288569&page=2, visited on 2.02.07.
Cease-SEZ! No zones till new rehab policy, retrieved from: http://www.ieport.com/daily-news/20070122094151.html, visited on 16.02.07.
 Vineeta Pandey, Centre for new SEZ rehab policy, retrieved from: http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1078195, visited on 16.02.07.
 Sonu Jain, In SEZ season, law for relief and rehab, retrieved from: http://www.indianexpress.com/story/15985.html, visited on 16.02.07.
 New SEZ norms fail to please all, Times Business, The Times of India, Ahmedabad, Friday, April 6, 2007.
 SEZ rehab policy on cards, retrieved from: http://www.ficci.com/news/viewnews1.asp?news_id=832, visited on 16.02.07.
 SEZ as a policy here to stay: Manmohan, Times Business, The Times of India, Ahmedabad, Saturday, March 24, 2007.
 SEZ back on track with many curbs, The Times of India, Front Page, Ahmedabad, Friday, April 6, 2007.
 Non Processing Area refers to real estate and other businesses that fall outside the core objectives for which an SEZ has been set up. (See footnote 38).
 States limit sops to SEZs, The Telegraph, Front Page, Calcutta, Sunday, 6 May, 2007.
 Corporate social responsibility, Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia, Visited on 24.1.07.
 Anirudh Burman, Social responsibilities in an SEZ, published under EDITOR’S PICK on January 24, 2007, retrieved from: www.indlaw.net, Indlaw Communications Pvt.Ltd., Visited on 24.1.07.
 R. VENKATESAN, Project impact assessment — Importance of social-cost benefit analysis, retrieved from: http://www.businessline.in/cgi-bin/print.pl?file=2007010600390800.htm&date=2007/01/06/&prd=bl&, visited on 23.1.07.
 S. Srinath, SEZs: Govt must re-do the homework, retrieved from: http://www.businessline.in/cgi-bin/print.pl?file=2006120600060800.htm&date=2006/12/06/&prd=bl&, visited on 23.1.07.
 SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES (SEZ) RULES, 2006, Published in Working Class, November 2006, retrieved from: http://citu.org.in/wclass_nov06_a4.htm, visited on 23.1.07.
 J.P. Singh, Special Economic Zones: Do they create Sustainable Value? Updated On: 12/29/2005, VisionRI Connexion Services Private Limited Retrieved from: www.visionri.com, , visited on 24.1.07.
 Bharat Ratna Baba Saheb Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar, retrieved from: http://ambedkarfoundation.nic.in/html/bharat.htm, visited on 27.1.07
47 SUBROTO ROY, ON LAND-GRABBING, retrieved from: http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?date=2007-01-14&usrsess=1&clid=3&id=170867, visited on 27.1.07.
48 Yossarin, SEZ Land Acquisition - Reliance shows the way, Retrieved from http://offstumped.nationalinterest.in/2007/01/15/sez-land-acquisition-reliance-shows-the-way/, visited on 27.1.07.
 Pradeep S Mehta, Broad benefits of special economic zones, retrieved from: http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=148842, visited on 25.1.07.
The author can be reached at: email@example.com
Legal AdviceGet legal advice from Highly qualified lawyers within 48hrs.
with complete solution.
lawyers in Delhi
lawyers in Chandigarh
lawyers in Allahabad
lawyers in Lucknow
lawyers in Jodhpur
lawyers in Jaipur
lawyers in New Delhi
lawyers in Nashik
lawyers in Mumbai
lawyers in Pune
lawyers in Nagpur
lawyers in Ahmedabad
lawyers in Surat
lawyers in Chicago
lawyers in Kolkata
lawyers in Janjgir
lawyers in Rajkot
lawyers in Indore
lawyers in Ludhiana
lawyers in Birmingham
|Lawyers in India - Search by City|
lawyers in Chennai
lawyers in Bangalore
lawyers in Hyderabad
lawyers in Cochin
lawyers in Pondicherry
lawyers in Agra
lawyers in Singapore
lawyers in Dhaka
lawyers in Dubai
lawyers in Toronto
lawyers in Sydney
lawyers in London
lawyers in Los Angeles
lawyers in New York
About Us |
F A Q |
Divorce by mutual consent |
| Submit article |
legal Service India.com is Copyrighted under the Registrar of Copyright Act ( Govt of India) © 2000-2015
ISBN No: 978-81-928510-0-6